Austin Condor JD? Geez LOL... Got to admit I still have mine at hand. Best for VHF for me in a portable application. It's in very good shape too being that it is decades-old lol.Most everyone here (including me) will agree that the Remtronix 800mhz is the best antenna for digital scanner reception. If I want to scan analog I go to my Austin Condor rubber ducky. The best two rubber ducks in the biz, IMO.
Austin Condor JD? Geez LOL... Got to admit I still have mine at hand. Best for VHF for me in a portable application. It's in very good shape too being that it is decades-old lol
Yes that will work just as well as the Remtronix.If I use a male sma to female bnc adapter with a radio shack 800 mhz antenna (looks exactly like remtronix) would it be the same?
The Remtronix 800 is actually not that great on UHF/T-band. The Diamond RH77CA is much better for those frequencies.Poster, the remtronix antenna is the best for 7 - 800 megahertz and it's also a go to antenna for UHF2 and T band, not so much VHF High. Checkout Scanner Master as they have a great array of portable antennas. Depends on what you mainly listen to. Google the topic and it will take you to numerous threads discussing the issue.
That is correct. And lower on the vertical scale is better performance.I'm assuming the black line is the Remtronix and the tan line is the RH77CA... Interesting dip for the Remtronix in the Milair band.
No it is not the most optimal antenna for the upper 400 megahertz and 500 megahertz area but it works just fine and well enough that I don't have to use an RH 77CA which I find inconvenient in a portable application, especially if I listen to a 700 megahertz simulcast system with a few UHF 450 megahertz repeaters for local off the system car-to-car police use. I guess I'm never too far away that I ever noticed any compromised receptionThe Remtronix 800 is actually not that great on UHF/T-band. The Diamond RH77CA is much better for those frequencies.
The Remtronix 800 is actually not that great on UHF/T-band. The Diamond RH77CA is much better for those frequencies.
For general UHF/T, I normally use the RH77CA. If you want to focus specifically on 500-512MHz, I'd pull the cap off the tip, trim as needed, then glue the cap back on.By any chance do you have any recommendations for specifically 500-512 MHz and/or more broader 450-512 MHz? I use both SMA and BNC (436 & TRX-1).
Thanks
It's tough in portable application to find an antenna that stands out over another. There are quite a bit of selections. In addition to reception you're also thinking about portability, length, weight.By any chance do you have any recommendations for specifically 500-512 MHz and/or more broader 450-512 MHz? I use both SMA and BNC (436 & TRX-1).
Thanks
Here's a link:I just saw Jon's post, that sounds like a good idea. Perhaps he would post a picture of his antenna tripod setup.
Just a quick note about the RS 800... it is the remtronix antenna. It was developed by the GRE company who made all of Radio Shacks scanners. GRE rebranded it with the Radio Shack name.If I use a male sma to female bnc adapter with a radio shack 800 mhz antenna (looks exactly like remtronix) would it be the same?
It was developed by the GRE company who made all of Radio Shacks scanners.
I didn't know we were going back to the beginning of time stone ages LOL but you are correct. All of the more recent scanners were made by GRE including the famous 2004, 5 + 6. The pro-96 was made by GRE and in my opinion blew the doors off the Uniden BC 250d. The first digital scanners both introduced at the same time in 2003. I've owned them ALL, I'm embarrassed to sayPoint of Order.GRE (and then Whistler) made about 60% (by model) of Radio Shack's scanners. Uniden made the rest. Note though that the last Uniden-produced model was introduced in 1999, so all of the "modern" RS scanners were made by GRE or Whistler.