SDS200

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Jul 26, 2003
Messages
869
Location
Canton, OH
Is there a control channel decoder for Motorola P25 that will work with the SDS200 via the usb connection and NOT require a discriminator tap?
 

maus92

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jun 23, 2004
Messages
8,270
Location
The OP
That capability could be enabled by a firmware update, and as of yet I have not seen any third party solution on the market. Probably easier to use an SDR dongle on a computer to run Unitrunker or similar software. I would not advise tearing into an SDS200. Not exactly sure what you want out of the cch signal, but a program like Proscan can log activity serially and provide a record and recordings.
 
Joined
Jul 26, 2003
Messages
869
Location
Canton, OH
So what is a good SDR dongle that will allow me to use Unitrunker to decode a 700/800 Mhz control channel? I should also note that it is a simulcast system.
 

ka3jjz

Wiki Admin Emeritus
Joined
Jul 22, 2002
Messages
25,643
Location
Bowie, Md.
You should really ask this in the Software Define Radio forum, but I keep hearing of folks using utilities such as DSD and UniTrunker with the various RTL-SDR sticks....Mike
 

maus92

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jun 23, 2004
Messages
8,270
Location
The OP
I own 5 of these:

One of these:

I prefer the Nooelec over the rtl-sdr. Both are stable TCXO (important feature,) but I find that the Nooelec take less freq correction, which is done in software. You only need one sdr, unless you want to go crazy and decode multiple control channels / systems.

Simulcast is not a huge factor when receiving / decoding a control channel, unlike P25 voice channels. The error correction in the cch signalling mitigates interference fairly well.

If I wasn't clear, Proscan will work with the SDS200 via USB or ethernet. But it is not really a control channel decoding program.
 
Last edited:

slicerwizard

Member
Joined
Sep 19, 2002
Messages
7,714
Location
Toronto, Ontario
So what is a good SDR dongle that will allow me to use Unitrunker to decode a 700/800 Mhz control channel? I should also note that it is a simulcast system.
The orange FlightAware Pro Sticks are good for UHF monitoring and very good for 700/800/900 MHz monitoring. They're far more sensitive than other dongles.

 

maus92

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jun 23, 2004
Messages
8,270
Location
The OP
I own a FlightStick Orange, however I haven't noticed that they are any better than the ones I mentioned - but then again, they are not any worse either. I already have amplification in my antenna system, so that might have something to do with it. I don't like the fact that the FlightAware case is plastic whereas the others use a metal case as a heat sink and presumably shielding. However, I'm sure a FA dongle would be fine.
 

slicerwizard

Member
Joined
Sep 19, 2002
Messages
7,714
Location
Toronto, Ontario
I own a FlightStick Orange, however I haven't noticed that they are any better than the ones I mentioned - but then again, they are not any worse either. I already have amplification in my antenna system, so that might have something to do with it.
Not surprising. Stacking amps is no bueno.

The orange sticks provide a better signal to noise ratio, which has a significant effect on decoding of digital signals.

These screen grabs were made using the same signal, same antenna, same time period. Let's see if they're legible...

Hamilton via Airspy Mini.pngHamilton via rtl-sdr.com dongle.pngHamilton via FlightAware dongle #1.pngHamilton via FlightAware dongle #2.png
 

Ubbe

Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2006
Messages
9,698
Location
Stockholm, Sweden
I got two rtl-sdr and both have so small frequency errors that it can barely be compensated for. The SDR# software allows 1ppm as the smallest step but I need 0,6 or 0,7ppm. And 1ppm are 100Hz at 100MHz. I've tested how much error are accepted when demodulating a digital tetra signal and that was 3-4ppm before any degradation could be noted.

The important thing are not how much off frequency they are, that there are always ways to adjust for in the software, but how stable they are. Choose a stick that has a temperature compensated oscillator, tcxo, so it wont drift when it gets warmer from use.

All SDR USB sticks I know of have I/Q demodulators that are needed to properly decode simulcast signals. Uniden put a radio/tv/sat SDR chip in their SDS scanners to get that I/Q feature. Simulcast affects all signals, both control channels and voice channels.

/Ubbe
 

maus92

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jun 23, 2004
Messages
8,270
Location
The OP
I got two rtl-sdr and both have so small frequency errors that it can barely be compensated for. The SDR# software allows 1ppm as the smallest step but I need 0,6 or 0,7ppm. And 1ppm are 100Hz at 100MHz. I've tested how much error are accepted when demodulating a digital tetra signal and that was 3-4ppm before any degradation could be noted.

The important thing are not how much off frequency they are, that there are always ways to adjust for in the software, but how stable they are. Choose a stick that has a temperature compensated oscillator, tcxo, so it wont drift when it gets warmer from use.

All SDR USB sticks I know of have I/Q demodulators that are needed to properly decode simulcast signals. Uniden put a radio/tv/sat SDR chip in their SDS scanners to get that I/Q feature. Simulcast affects all signals, both control channels and voice channels.

/Ubbe
The simulcast / multicast does affect all signals, but I can decode cch's from a farther distance than I can decode voice.
 

jonwienke

More Info Coming Soon!
Joined
Jul 18, 2014
Messages
13,409
Location
VA
That's by design. Going the other way around wouldn't make sense--you can't use the voice channels if the control channel is unreadable.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top