- Joined
- Feb 13, 2017
- Messages
- 186
Recently we have been having a LOT of issues with the power grid in our area. Being as it's really rural, it's not the best but is being upgraded. If it storms you can guarantee we will lose power to one of the repeater sites.
I want to set everything up here with the easiest to use for the end user and have some redundancy at the same time.
I have Internet at both repeater sites, and the LE repeaters are already linked together.
I've tinkered with the site roaming feature on the LE repeaters and it seemed to work pretty well for my testing. Granted the Sheriff was totally against it because he can't scan every channel in existence like he wants and site roam at the same time (well maybe he can with multi zone scan but that's another thing) so I'm not worried about LE this time. We will focus on Fire/EMS.
Fire/EMS uses 2 NXR-710 repeaters. One main, one secondary. Not linked at the moment but waiting on the KTI-3's to get here. We, and 911 has to swap manually to the secondary one when the main one loses power. (The power issue there is almost resolved as a new generator was installed today)
Here's the kicker, they both use the SAME RX/TX frequency but different RAN codes.
Main question - From what I've read, you cannot site roam with 2 repeaters with the same RX/TX. You have to use simulcast, which seems to be a way bigger deal than I'm going for.
Did I read that incorrectly? Would there be an issue with them using the same freq, but diff RAN for site roaming? I want to set up FD/EMS to site roam so in the event that the main site goes down, it will swap to the secondary and the user will not have to manually swap to the other repeater. To me, switching manually is fine. But I feel as if I'm asking some of the other users to do advanced algebra with their eyes closed.
Is there any other ways I might accomplish what I'm wanting?
Forgive me if there is info that I did not include that is needed. This may be a dumb idea, but I really think it will help with some of the the communication issues everyones complains about here. Those complaints are 90% user error so I'm trying to eliminate that.
Thanks guys!
I want to set everything up here with the easiest to use for the end user and have some redundancy at the same time.
I have Internet at both repeater sites, and the LE repeaters are already linked together.
I've tinkered with the site roaming feature on the LE repeaters and it seemed to work pretty well for my testing. Granted the Sheriff was totally against it because he can't scan every channel in existence like he wants and site roam at the same time (well maybe he can with multi zone scan but that's another thing) so I'm not worried about LE this time. We will focus on Fire/EMS.
Fire/EMS uses 2 NXR-710 repeaters. One main, one secondary. Not linked at the moment but waiting on the KTI-3's to get here. We, and 911 has to swap manually to the secondary one when the main one loses power. (The power issue there is almost resolved as a new generator was installed today)
Here's the kicker, they both use the SAME RX/TX frequency but different RAN codes.
Main question - From what I've read, you cannot site roam with 2 repeaters with the same RX/TX. You have to use simulcast, which seems to be a way bigger deal than I'm going for.
Did I read that incorrectly? Would there be an issue with them using the same freq, but diff RAN for site roaming? I want to set up FD/EMS to site roam so in the event that the main site goes down, it will swap to the secondary and the user will not have to manually swap to the other repeater. To me, switching manually is fine. But I feel as if I'm asking some of the other users to do advanced algebra with their eyes closed.
Is there any other ways I might accomplish what I'm wanting?
Forgive me if there is info that I did not include that is needed. This may be a dumb idea, but I really think it will help with some of the the communication issues everyones complains about here. Those complaints are 90% user error so I'm trying to eliminate that.
Thanks guys!