• Effective immediately we will be deleting, without notice, any negative threads or posts that deal with the use of encryption and streaming of scanner audio.

    We've noticed a huge increase in rants and negative posts that revolve around agencies going to encryption due to the broadcasting of scanner audio on the internet. It's now worn out and continues to be the same recycled rants. These rants hijack the threads and derail the conversation. They no longer have a place anywhere on this forum other than in the designated threads in the Rants forum in the Tavern.

    If you violate these guidelines your post will be deleted without notice and an infraction will be issued. We are not against discussion of this issue. You just need to do it in the right place. For example:
    https://forums.radioreference.com/rants/224104-official-thread-live-audio-feeds-scanners-wait-encryption.html

The future of Digital

Status
Not open for further replies.

xxxsandman

Member
Joined
Aug 1, 2004
Messages
70
I bought my 1st portable digital scanner a couple weeks ago, a Uniden BCD396T. It's a fine scanner and I programmed it up with all the State DPS stuff. I live in NE Oklahoma, by Pryor. I can't pick up the State DPS system in my area. So, I took the new portable with me on my next trip to Tulsa. About Claremore I started picking the DPS System up and by Catossa it was clear.

I was hoping I might hear my 1st digital comms, but quickly found out anything digital was encrypted. At least during my 3 hours of listening.

I read that Tulsa is trying to move all of it's agencies to Digital soon. I suppose they too, will be encrypted once digital. I mean, why wouldn't they encrypt it, once they make the move to digital? Is there any reason they would run digital without encryption? I can't think of any. The quality of the analog communications on the Tulsa DPS system was superb, so I don't know of any reason to switch Digital, other then encryption. So now I ask myself why I spent the extra $ buying a digital trunking scanner, instead of an anolog one.......

James
 
N

N_Jay

Guest
Encryption options still add cost and complexity to a digital radio system.

They also add complexity to the management of the system.

Plus they stir up (mostly unfounded) fears of inappropriate covert intentions.
 

kikito

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
2,539
Location
North Pole, Alaska
xxxsandman said:
So now I ask myself why I spent the extra $ buying a digital trunking scanner, instead of an anolog one.......

James
Not all digital systems and communications are or will be encrypted.

The main drive and funding for new digital systems is coming from the Homeland Security grants and the (somehow misguided) efforts to fight terrorism, which are both used as a pretext to run "closed" systems/communications. Other reasons are the push to comply with federal mandates of narrowbanding/spectrum efficiency and interoperability, which converting to digital is not absolutely necessary to accomplish any or all of those objectives.

Like N_Jay mentioned, many agencies will not use encryption because, especially on big systems, it substantially increases the budget and maintenance of the system. Not to mention, adding one more *possible* point of failure/malfunction and possibly hindering interoperability between agencies if the encryption implemention is not done properly.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top