I always do my best to submit accurate information, and when I receive a Capacity Max system that shows in RRDB as a Tier 3 Standard, I submit an update to have the RRDB updated to reflect that correction.
As I am traveling for a few days, I picked up one such system, and submitted the change so it could be updated (and I've got another one that has some other major edits to submit in the next few days). While the admin that worked the submission did make other changes (added neighbor lists), they responded back to the type change with the following:
Of course that meant the correction was not made, and the ticket closed.
That seems an unusual issue, and to me sounds more like a problem for the team at Uniden to figure out (much like the issue with NexEdge systems that use dynamic addressing), it also means that the recently added DMR System data downloads for DSDPlus are completely broken (thanks LB for that addition) and have to have significant edits before they're usable.
Can someone shed some light on this and if this is a RRDB issue, or was the administrator incorrect?
As I am traveling for a few days, I picked up one such system, and submitted the change so it could be updated (and I've got another one that has some other major edits to submit in the next few days). While the admin that worked the submission did make other changes (added neighbor lists), they responded back to the type change with the following:
Unfortunately there is a datavase issue that prevents Capacity Plus systems from downloading to / appearing in the Sentinel software used by many to program their Uniden radios, so we left the system type set to Standard (since it does not affect scanning the system) to work around this issue.
(Aside, I'm not going to Name and Shame the administrator that wrote the above in the public forum, PM me if you want that information)
Of course that meant the correction was not made, and the ticket closed.
That seems an unusual issue, and to me sounds more like a problem for the team at Uniden to figure out (much like the issue with NexEdge systems that use dynamic addressing), it also means that the recently added DMR System data downloads for DSDPlus are completely broken (thanks LB for that addition) and have to have significant edits before they're usable.
Can someone shed some light on this and if this is a RRDB issue, or was the administrator incorrect?