Are you looking to buy - there's many more choices than that - and the price is inflated by having the Grundig badge on the front. They're made by a contractor in China. Search EPay and you'll find the original article at half the price.
I've heard that the G6 was very sensitive and the 500 was ok.
And that is the problem. The G6 is very sensitive, in fact too sensitive when used with a good external antenna. Many portables are to try and make up for working on the small whip antenna.
Yes, there is such a thing as "too sensitive", particularly when combined with poor image rejection, such as most micro or ultra light portables. Perhaps a better term would be it is possible to be needlesly sensitive and thus cause other operational problems.
If you do not intend to use an external antenna then there are many portables that will work OK. But, you also will not receive a lot of what you want to hear. The best, most expensive, whiz-bang radio in the World will not perform worth a darn without a good antenna, and a 2 foot whip is not a good antenna at HF frequencies.
Also, you asked in your other thread about military communications. To that end you will need a good antenna, milcoms are not often 500 kW powerhouses such as is found for SWL BC stations.
What you want is a solid front end, good image rejection, high stability, and good filtering, all with "enough" sensitvity. The 500 will deliver those better than the G6, however the 500 does have a couple of issues. The AMS is not very good, and it tends to overload to instability on SSB signals if you are not carefull.
If you are going to use the radio you select with the built in whip or at best a few feet of random wire than the G6 might be the ticket. But then you will not hear much of what you want. If you plan to use a good antenna, something with real aperature, then the 500 would be my choice...at least if I was making the decision and only could select from among those two. Then again, I would not be limiting myself to those two radios if I could help it. I am not saying theya re bad, just that they can be bettered....quite easily, but nothing is free, performance cost.
T!
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_2_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8C148 Safari/6533.18.5)
Last weekend Fry's in CA was selling the Grundig 4000 for $26.33. I bought one but am thinking I should have gotten another before they're gone.
I can comment on the G6. It does very well with international broadcasters and my unit never overloads even with a 50 foot random wire. And the 5khz/1khz tuning option is very good.
The three cons, is that (at least my unit) only has USB working right and you have to tune 2khz higher than the freq to receive it. And that the speaker doesn't sound real good although it's a small radio. It does rather good using headphones. And the FM reception isn't that good, again this is a small radio.
I just wonder if it is my unit or a flaw in the G6 that prevents LSB reception (hams in lower bands).
I could not pickup SSB when I had the the G6. But on my Sat 500 I can really really good.
I did a comparson between both and the sat 500 wins.
well on the three categories, yes the 500 would win easily. But your comparing a radio the size of a pack of cards to a radio that's 10 times larger. But the G6 will pick up every broadcaster the 500 (and every other radio on the planet) the same. Perhaps even more with the G6 consider how sensitive it is. And the battery life of the G6 is just plain awesome.
I personally would recommend the G5 or Kaito De1103. That does an incredible job on broadcasting, and both USB and LSB signals. Easy to take the output and convert faxes, PSK31, and other formats via software. Wide-narrow switch works very well. You can also plug it into a very nice stereo system like a Bose, and get outstanding sound.