• To anyone looking to acquire commercial radio programming software:

    Please do not make requests for copies of radio programming software which is sold (or was sold) by the manufacturer for any monetary value. All requests will be deleted and a forum infraction issued. Making a request such as this is attempting to engage in software piracy and this forum cannot be involved or associated with this activity. The same goes for any private transaction via Private Message. Even if you attempt to engage in this activity in PM's we will still enforce the forum rules. Your PM's are not private and the administration has the right to read them if there's a hint to criminal activity.

    If you are having trouble legally obtaining software please state so. We do not want any hurt feelings when your vague post is mistaken for a free request. It is YOUR responsibility to properly word your request.

    To obtain Motorola software see the Sticky in the Motorola forum.

    The various other vendors often permit their dealers to sell the software online (i.e., Kenwood). Please use Google or some other search engine to find a dealer that sells the software. Typically each series or individual radio requires its own software package. Often the Kenwood software is less than $100 so don't be a cheapskate; just purchase it.

    For M/A Com/Harris/GE, etc: there are two software packages that program all current and past radios. One package is for conventional programming and the other for trunked programming. The trunked package is in upwards of $2,500. The conventional package is more reasonable though is still several hundred dollars. The benefit is you do not need multiple versions for each radio (unlike Motorola).

    This is a large and very visible forum. We cannot jeopardize the ability to provide the RadioReference services by allowing this activity to occur. Please respect this.

2 antennas, destructive interference

Status
Not open for further replies.

othla

Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2015
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I'm experimenting with two radios (IEEE 802.15.4 .. cf = 2.475GHz, bw = 5MHz), transmitting the same data on the same channel. Both radios have lambda/4 antennas, vertically polarized, 2dBi gain. I'm looking at the received power and decoding on the receiver end (through a mixed domain oscilloscope).

When the antennas are placed far off (~10-20 cm), I see power in the channel increases (~6dBm) and can decode well. Understandable.

But when they are placed one touching the other, then power in the channel decreases, and received symbols are corrupted! Can somebody explain the phenomenon here, please?
 

othla

Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2015
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
To add ..

I'm experimenting with two radios (IEEE 802.15.4 .. cf = 2.475GHz, bw = 5MHz), transmitting the same data on the same channel. Both radios have lambda/4 antennas, vertically polarized, 2dBi gain. I'm looking at the received power and decoding on the receiver end (through a mixed domain oscilloscope).

When the antennas are placed far off (~10-20 cm), I see power in the channel increases (~6dBm) and can decode well. Understandable.

But when they are placed one touching the other, then power in the channel decreases, and received symbols are corrupted! Can somebody explain the phenomenon here, please?

I've ensured that the two nodes are synchronized at nanosecond level by external power source. So the waves on the channel must almost be the same, except for a little phase difference.
 

zz0468

QRT
Banned
Joined
Feb 6, 2007
Messages
6,034
Reaction score
277
Can somebody explain the phenomenon here, please?

Not with the question as stated.

Do the radios have two antennas each that you're changing the separation, or are you changing the separation between the two radios?

At 2475 MHz, one wavelength is approximately 12 cm. Dipoles (or monopoles with ground plane) spaced one wavelength apart and fed in proper phase will exhibit some gain and directivity. Placed at the wrong spacing, they could exhibit almost complete field cancellation.
 

othla

Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2015
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
We did try changing the separation for various distances, and we got the results almost as you guessed it at lambda/2. It does not totally cancel out since the two nodes will not transmit with the same phase (in theory, they should and at lambda/2 the phases are 180 degree out of phase). But there were lot of bit errors.

The interesting question was to see what would happen if all antennas were placed together. In this case, we found power on the channel decreased and there were lot of bit errors, and also many packets were lost. I don't know why ... I suspect it is something to do with the antenna and some physics behind it ...
 

SCPD

QRT
Joined
Feb 24, 2001
Messages
0
Reaction score
112
Location
Virginia
Have you thought about mounting one antenna directly above another? We used to do this with dirty cheap repeaters, and had good success. I'm gonna make a lame attempt at making a picture:

I_I
I
I_I
I
I

Not too bad. Basically one vertical directly under another. Like I said, I've seen setups like this, without a duplexer, and the output not getting into the input on a repeater.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top