• To anyone looking to acquire commercial radio programming software:

    Please do not make requests for copies of radio programming software which is sold (or was sold) by the manufacturer for any monetary value. All requests will be deleted and a forum infraction issued. Making a request such as this is attempting to engage in software piracy and this forum cannot be involved or associated with this activity. The same goes for any private transaction via Private Message. Even if you attempt to engage in this activity in PM's we will still enforce the forum rules. Your PM's are not private and the administration has the right to read them if there's a hint to criminal activity.

    If you are having trouble legally obtaining software please state so. We do not want any hurt feelings when your vague post is mistaken for a free request. It is YOUR responsibility to properly word your request.

    To obtain Motorola software see the Sticky in the Motorola forum.

    The various other vendors often permit their dealers to sell the software online (i.e., Kenwood). Please use Google or some other search engine to find a dealer that sells the software. Typically each series or individual radio requires its own software package. Often the Kenwood software is less than $100 so don't be a cheapskate; just purchase it.

    For M/A Com/Harris/GE, etc: there are two software packages that program all current and past radios. One package is for conventional programming and the other for trunked programming. The trunked package is in upwards of $2,500. The conventional package is more reasonable though is still several hundred dollars. The benefit is you do not need multiple versions for each radio (unlike Motorola).

    This is a large and very visible forum. We cannot jeopardize the ability to provide the RadioReference services by allowing this activity to occur. Please respect this.

2017 Dodge Charger Installs

Status
Not open for further replies.

ke6gcv

Member
Joined
Feb 13, 2006
Messages
261
Location
Somewhere, Northern CA
Would it be better putting the antenna on the roof, or on the trunk?

Aesthetics and opinion? Trunk, by far! Looks so much better, I think. Functionality, of course, would be to mount it on the roof.

I do, however, have to be careful of how fast I open my trunk. Given the length of the antenna, it knocks on the glass when I have it opened.

Depending on the length of the antenna, you have to be care of roof mounts with low hanging branches and parking structures. Don't want to break the antenna at the mount. (I've seen the damage during my radio install days. Not pretty!) Yes, you could remove the antenna altogether or lay it over, depending if you bought that style of antenna. But even that can be an inconvenience. Plus you risk loosening the brass ring of the NMO if you remove the antenna all the time to compensate for such an issue.
 
Last edited:

PrivatelyJeff

Has more money than sense
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jun 5, 2016
Messages
1,068
Location
Kings County, CA
Careful mounting under the seats. Your floor vents will warm up the radios.

I’ve thought about that, but I don’t use the heat much and when I do the permanent install, I was going to build some sort of thermal protection around the gear.
 

Colton25

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Aug 13, 2011
Messages
776
On my previous car i was able to pull up the plastic along the bottom seal of the passenger doors in order to run the remote head cable to the front of the car. Do the plastics along the doors in the Charger come off easily? Anything I need to watch out for to prevent damage?
 

ke6gcv

Member
Joined
Feb 13, 2006
Messages
261
Location
Somewhere, Northern CA
On my previous car i was able to pull up the plastic along the bottom seal of the passenger doors in order to run the remote head cable to the front of the car. Do the plastics along the doors in the Charger come off easily? Anything I need to watch out for to prevent damage?

On the 2010 line, yes, they're easily removed with nothing to watch for. I removed mine when I ran antenna cables to the front for use with my portables. I then had to removed them again when I took out the antennas so that I may install my mobile (cables were ran completely different).

I don't think anything has changed with those pieces on the 2017 line. But don't quote me on that!
 

Colton25

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Aug 13, 2011
Messages
776
Anyone that uses a remote head ever think about removing the sunglass holder and installing it there? Looking at it it looks like a perfect fit for a remote head.
 

Colton25

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Aug 13, 2011
Messages
776
Today i pulled down the overhead console and removed the sunglass holder just to see how things would line up. In my opinion I don’t think it looks all that bad. This is using the Kenwood Nx-5700 featured control head which is the largest remote head I’ve seen so anything smaller would fit all the better. The best part is if you decide you want to go back to the factory look any holes created from mounting or the remote cable would be hidden inside the sunglass holder and would be covered when the sunglass holder is closed. The only downfall I noticed was the remote head is seen in top third of the rearview mirror, to me this wouldn’t be a big deal as you still have a good view out the rear window. Unfortunately I can’t get a good picture with the overhead console in place until the head is bolted to the console. I look forward to hearing everyone’s input.

32e72b2009eaafea610baedbc5fa2517.jpg
 

ke6gcv

Member
Joined
Feb 13, 2006
Messages
261
Location
Somewhere, Northern CA
Today i pulled down the overhead console and removed the sunglass holder just to see how things would line up. In my opinion I don’t think it looks all that bad. This is using the Kenwood Nx-5700 featured control head which is the largest remote head I’ve seen so anything smaller would fit all the better. The best part is if you decide you want to go back to the factory look any holes created from mounting or the remote cable would be hidden inside the sunglass holder and would be covered when the sunglass holder is closed. The only downfall I noticed was the remote head is seen in top third of the rearview mirror, to me this wouldn’t be a big deal as you still have a good view out the rear window. Unfortunately I can’t get a good picture with the overhead console in place until the head is bolted to the console. I look forward to hearing everyone’s input.

That is a great idea! Will you be running a mic extension cable to somewhere around the center console? Or letting it hang from the ceiling?
 

Colton25

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Aug 13, 2011
Messages
776
As of now I don’t plan on installing a mic due to the fact that I don’t talk much. If I ever start using the mic enough to leave it in place I would run an extension cable. I have everything installed now except for power and the antenna. I’ll probably post a forum on the overall install.
 

ke6gcv

Member
Joined
Feb 13, 2006
Messages
261
Location
Somewhere, Northern CA
As of now I don’t plan on installing a mic due to the fact that I don’t talk much. If I ever start using the mic enough to leave it in place I would run an extension cable. I have everything installed now except for power and the antenna. I’ll probably post a forum on the overall install.

Awesome! Looking forward to the finished results!

Thank you!
 

kayn1n32008

ØÆSØ Say it, say 'ENCRYPTION'
Joined
Sep 20, 2008
Messages
7,012
Location
Sector 001
Anyone that uses a remote head ever think about removing the sunglass holder and installing it there? Looking at it it looks like a perfect fit for a remote head.



I just did that with my V71A control head. Mine is in a 2014 Jetta, I’m lucky, as I can not see my control head in my rear view mirror.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top