536hp or SDS200

scannerman200

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Aug 31, 2004
Messages
554
Reaction score
21
Location
North Central Alabama
I’ve got a trade in credit at a radio store and I’m trying to decide whether to get the 536hp or the 200. I could pay $250 and get the 536 or $350 and get the 200. Will be used as a base station. Any suggestions? No simulcast in my county, but there are a couple in neighboring ones that I monitor sometimes.
 

K4EET

Chaplain
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Feb 18, 2015
Messages
2,948
Reaction score
2,177
Location
Severn, Maryland, USA
I’ve got a trade in credit at a radio store and I’m trying to decide whether to get the 536hp or the 200. I could pay $250 and get the 536 or $350 and get the 200. Will be used as a base station. Any suggestions? No simulcast in my county, but there are a couple in neighboring ones that I monitor sometimes.
For $100, I would go with the SDS200.
 

hiegtx

Mentor
Premium Subscriber
Joined
May 8, 2004
Messages
12,069
Reaction score
4,453
Location
Dallas, TX
I’ve got a trade in credit at a radio store and I’m trying to decide whether to get the 536hp or the 200. I could pay $250 and get the 536 or $350 and get the 200. Will be used as a base station. Any suggestions? No simulcast in my county, but there are a couple in neighboring ones that I monitor sometimes.
I would also opt for the SDS200. While you may not have simulcast in your home county at this time, a future system upgrade might add that to the situation. And monitoring the neighboring systems, which are simulcast, will be more reliable with the 200.
 

J-Wrock

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Aug 18, 2017
Messages
394
Reaction score
423
Location
Kansas City Area
I’ve got a trade in credit at a radio store and I’m trying to decide whether to get the 536hp or the 200. I could pay $250 and get the 536 or $350 and get the 200. Will be used as a base station. Any suggestions? No simulcast in my county, but there are a couple in neighboring ones that I monitor sometimes.
I agree with the above posts about going with the 200 especially if you can afford the additional $100. In addition to the possibility of future simulcast issues, the 200 has a bigger screen.
 

pb_lonny

VK7AAL
Joined
Jul 2, 2012
Messages
2,626
Reaction score
1,152
Location
Tasmania
For the difference in proce, get the SDS-200.
Maybe also see how much the SDS-150 would be, it is the "best of the best" at the moment.
 

noaim

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Aug 9, 2012
Messages
637
Reaction score
210
Location
Milwaukee, WI
The 150 is awesome I also have a 100 and 200 I like the 200 for a desk as the display is awesome but the 150 is the grail
 

mikec10

Member
Joined
Jan 15, 2006
Messages
76
Reaction score
27
Location
Schenectady NY
I would pick sds200. I have both sds200 and bcd536. Both are great scanners but with the sds200 you are in a better position to incorporate p25 digital. I do not own a sds150 yet but I would get that if it was available at your venue.
 
Top