855.36875 - request help to ID

[batdude]

above freq is showing a DMR Type III (CAP MAX) Site 6-4, Color Code of 6

freq is verified accurate.


this is not a licensed freq in Florida - best I can tell anyway.


signal is copyable from Space Coast .... Suspect it's in Orlando/Osceola Co

 

[ThreatLevelMidnight]

Not picking it up from NW Orange County

 

[mtindor]

As much as you say that frequency is accurate, I have my doubts. Maybe its an image of a stronger actual image much closer to you.

 

[mtindor]

How about 856.3625 -- Maybe SpaceX. They have an 800 Mhz trunked DMR license with 6 sites. 856.3625 would be TItusville

FCC Callsign WRVW742 (Space Exploration Technologies dba SpaceX)

FCC Callsign WRVW742 (Space Exploration Technologies dba SpaceX)

www.radioreference.com

 

[seagravebuff60]

above freq is showing a DMR Type III (CAP MAX) Site 6-4, Color Code of 6

Did it say S6-4, or Site 6-4?

EDIT: Never mind, I got it.


So the system ID is 6, Site 4. Whatever it is, there's nothing identified as that system ID in the DB. The exact frequency isn't licensed. I've sat on it for 15 minutes, and there is no traffic. It's also showing an NL as Site 3. Control Channel on LSN/Channel ID 3551. I'm just having a hard time figuring that out.

 

[seagravebuff60]

Based on a hunch that it was Space X, I put all of their FCC licenses for the complex into the scan list and got hits for the same Network ID of 6 and at least 2-5 other sites. It looks like this might be an in-the-works T3 System for Space X.

 

[mtindor]

Based on a hunch that it was Space X, I put all of their FCC licenses for the complex into the scan list and got hits for the same Network ID of 6 and at least 2-5 other sites. It looks like this might be an in-the-works T3 System for Space X.

A hunch? SpaceX was aldeady discussed as the likely candidate

 

[seagravebuff60]

Im sorry I forgot the fact that you know everything about every system/frequency in the US.

Im just reporting what i find. But instead of an actual acknowledgement from the author for taking time out of my day to help him identify something, i get attitude for just reporting my findings and trying to help. But im not suprised.

 

[batdude]

stay on track without animosity please, I am very much watching this thread.


/r

 

[seagravebuff60]

stay on track without animosity please, I am very much watching this thread.


/r

Ok sounds good, I put all of the FCC licenses into the scanlist like I mentioned and will report back tomorrow. Altho what im seeing right now is no activity on a lot of sites and sites with invalid LCNs/Ch IDs. So def something to look forward to in the future as a possible new system.

 

[batdude]

Ok sounds good, I put all of the FCC licenses into the scanlist like I mentioned and will report back tomorrow. Altho what im seeing right now is no activity on a lot of sites and sites with invalid LCNs/Ch IDs. So def something to look forward to in the future as a possible new system.

i think the "birth" is happening.....

 

[batdude]

this thread is closed. continue discussions here:

SpaceX CAPMAX

well, here is the start of an interesting thread. Looks like SpaceX is migrating to a multi-site, connected CAPMAX system for their various sites .... This is just a first look - but the Cape site appears to be coming online now with CC data noted on various channels. ref this thread...

forums.radioreference.com