chgomonitor
Silent Key
(These observations are based purely on local, practical application and not on lab measurements. My listening post is in a high RF environment - suburban Chicago).
A long time ago I settled on the Uniden BC780XLT for use as a dedicated Milair (mostly 225 - 400 MHz) scanning and searching receiver. My personal experience has shown them to be highly sensitive and reasonably selective radios for this purpose, especially for long distance and weak signal reception. (Oddly, the discontinued Radio Shack Pro-2045 running a close second). Virtually all of my local Milair monitoring is aimed towards locations and activities quite far from here as there isn’t much truly local activity.
I push the front ends of most of my radios pretty hard, employing a Diamond D-130J Discone on a 30 foot outdoor mast fed with heliax into a Stridsberg Engineering MCA208 active, 8-port multicoupler:
http://www.stridsberg.com/mca208a.htm
A number of nearby FM broadcast stations cause tremendous VHF air band noise, so I use a Winegard FT7500 trap in front of the multicoupler to kill most of that:
https://www.tselectronic.com/winegard/ft7500.html
I’m a long time Milair monitoring buff. I found the recent loss of access to flight supplement information particularly depressing. Then I began seeing reports of local UHF Milair frequency changes at places like Selfridge and became increasingly concerned about other possible local flying activity on new frequencies.
I started thinking about the techniques we used long ago to find active Milair communications. Things like computer driven radios, search and store and recording audio on suspect frequencies. I fired up all my old tech systems to see how they’d do in today's listening environment. Search and store or computerized logging using the BC780XLT seemed to win hands down. But I found I had a serious new challenge.
Over the course of two months of almost non-stop automated searching using two 780’s I discovered I had done a really great job of logging a ton of local noise, even with the 780’s attenuator set to “ON”. The local FM broadcast stations signals were mixing with high power, local UHF repeaters, automated VHF taxicab transmitters, NOAA weather radio and 800 MHz Nextel noise. This created a wideband wall of noise which was drifting around 300 - 400 MHz, basically flooding the front ends of the 780’s. Not so good. Thinking about the problem and what we used to do about it, I recalled my departed, dear old friend Jeff Zeman and a place he did a lot of business with:
http://www.minicircuits.com/
(I suspect Jeff’s monitoring ghost will haunt me forever!)
After a week of pouring over spec sheets and web studies on things like bandpass, notch and cavity filters I settled on the idea of using a combination of high and low pass filters in series in the antenna line feeding a 780XLT. The idea was to create my own custom bandpass filter for 225 - 400 MHz at minimal cost. Though I would have preferred something with a bit steeper UHF cut-off, I finally decided on these two units from minicircuits:
Low Pass Filter BLP-450+ Spec Sheet:
http://www.minicircuits.com/pdfs/BLP-450+.pdf
High Pass Filter BHP-250 Spec Sheet:
http://www.minicircuits.com/pdfs/BHP-250.pdf
The total was about 80 dollars. Five days after web ordering they arrived and I got to work this morning. I simply connected one to a multicoupler output, the other to it and finally the 780 antenna coax jumper to the end.
These don’t create as much of an “RF wall” as I had assumed they would. A few high power local VHF stations are still coming through, as are most wide-area high power UHF stations, albeit much weaker. Everything below 150 MHz is just about totally gone however, including the FM broadcast band in its entirety and my local airport ATIS on 124.200.
So, for the past few hours I’ve been searching 225 - 400 MHz with the now bandpass filter equipped BC780XLT. Wow! Total success! The only noise I’m left with is from the local oscillators off of other radios in the shack and sensitivity overall seems very greatly improved. I caught some low altitude guys flying in the Hilltop / 12 Mile MOA’s for the very first time and this is some 140 miles away across the flat lands of the Midwest. Best of all, I’m finally able to turn off the attenuator on the 780 and I’m now enjoying the true sensitivity offered by this fine radio while performing a wide band search. I’m a very happy camper and I’ll be resuming my automated search and store routines on UHF Milair.
If you have a similar local noise UHF Milair situation working against you I’d encourage you to try this or a similar solution. Even at fairly quiet monitoring locations I’m guessing you’ll see some improvement in 225 - 400 MHz sensitivity. It really makes a world of difference, especially for weak signal work.
Happy Scanning! - Ted
A long time ago I settled on the Uniden BC780XLT for use as a dedicated Milair (mostly 225 - 400 MHz) scanning and searching receiver. My personal experience has shown them to be highly sensitive and reasonably selective radios for this purpose, especially for long distance and weak signal reception. (Oddly, the discontinued Radio Shack Pro-2045 running a close second). Virtually all of my local Milair monitoring is aimed towards locations and activities quite far from here as there isn’t much truly local activity.
I push the front ends of most of my radios pretty hard, employing a Diamond D-130J Discone on a 30 foot outdoor mast fed with heliax into a Stridsberg Engineering MCA208 active, 8-port multicoupler:
http://www.stridsberg.com/mca208a.htm
A number of nearby FM broadcast stations cause tremendous VHF air band noise, so I use a Winegard FT7500 trap in front of the multicoupler to kill most of that:
https://www.tselectronic.com/winegard/ft7500.html
I’m a long time Milair monitoring buff. I found the recent loss of access to flight supplement information particularly depressing. Then I began seeing reports of local UHF Milair frequency changes at places like Selfridge and became increasingly concerned about other possible local flying activity on new frequencies.
I started thinking about the techniques we used long ago to find active Milair communications. Things like computer driven radios, search and store and recording audio on suspect frequencies. I fired up all my old tech systems to see how they’d do in today's listening environment. Search and store or computerized logging using the BC780XLT seemed to win hands down. But I found I had a serious new challenge.
Over the course of two months of almost non-stop automated searching using two 780’s I discovered I had done a really great job of logging a ton of local noise, even with the 780’s attenuator set to “ON”. The local FM broadcast stations signals were mixing with high power, local UHF repeaters, automated VHF taxicab transmitters, NOAA weather radio and 800 MHz Nextel noise. This created a wideband wall of noise which was drifting around 300 - 400 MHz, basically flooding the front ends of the 780’s. Not so good. Thinking about the problem and what we used to do about it, I recalled my departed, dear old friend Jeff Zeman and a place he did a lot of business with:
http://www.minicircuits.com/
(I suspect Jeff’s monitoring ghost will haunt me forever!)
After a week of pouring over spec sheets and web studies on things like bandpass, notch and cavity filters I settled on the idea of using a combination of high and low pass filters in series in the antenna line feeding a 780XLT. The idea was to create my own custom bandpass filter for 225 - 400 MHz at minimal cost. Though I would have preferred something with a bit steeper UHF cut-off, I finally decided on these two units from minicircuits:
Low Pass Filter BLP-450+ Spec Sheet:
http://www.minicircuits.com/pdfs/BLP-450+.pdf
High Pass Filter BHP-250 Spec Sheet:
http://www.minicircuits.com/pdfs/BHP-250.pdf
The total was about 80 dollars. Five days after web ordering they arrived and I got to work this morning. I simply connected one to a multicoupler output, the other to it and finally the 780 antenna coax jumper to the end.
These don’t create as much of an “RF wall” as I had assumed they would. A few high power local VHF stations are still coming through, as are most wide-area high power UHF stations, albeit much weaker. Everything below 150 MHz is just about totally gone however, including the FM broadcast band in its entirety and my local airport ATIS on 124.200.
So, for the past few hours I’ve been searching 225 - 400 MHz with the now bandpass filter equipped BC780XLT. Wow! Total success! The only noise I’m left with is from the local oscillators off of other radios in the shack and sensitivity overall seems very greatly improved. I caught some low altitude guys flying in the Hilltop / 12 Mile MOA’s for the very first time and this is some 140 miles away across the flat lands of the Midwest. Best of all, I’m finally able to turn off the attenuator on the 780 and I’m now enjoying the true sensitivity offered by this fine radio while performing a wide band search. I’m a very happy camper and I’ll be resuming my automated search and store routines on UHF Milair.
If you have a similar local noise UHF Milair situation working against you I’d encourage you to try this or a similar solution. Even at fairly quiet monitoring locations I’m guessing you’ll see some improvement in 225 - 400 MHz sensitivity. It really makes a world of difference, especially for weak signal work.
Happy Scanning! - Ted