• To anyone looking to acquire commercial radio programming software:

    Please do not make requests for copies of radio programming software which is sold (or was sold) by the manufacturer for any monetary value. All requests will be deleted and a forum infraction issued. Making a request such as this is attempting to engage in software piracy and this forum cannot be involved or associated with this activity. The same goes for any private transaction via Private Message. Even if you attempt to engage in this activity in PM's we will still enforce the forum rules. Your PM's are not private and the administration has the right to read them if there's a hint to criminal activity.

    If you are having trouble legally obtaining software please state so. We do not want any hurt feelings when your vague post is mistaken for a free request. It is YOUR responsibility to properly word your request.

    To obtain Motorola software see the Sticky in the Motorola forum.

    The various other vendors often permit their dealers to sell the software online (i.e., Kenwood). Please use Google or some other search engine to find a dealer that sells the software. Typically each series or individual radio requires its own software package. Often the Kenwood software is less than $100 so don't be a cheapskate; just purchase it.

    For M/A Com/Harris/GE, etc: there are two software packages that program all current and past radios. One package is for conventional programming and the other for trunked programming. The trunked package is in upwards of $2,500. The conventional package is more reasonable though is still several hundred dollars. The benefit is you do not need multiple versions for each radio (unlike Motorola).

    This is a large and very visible forum. We cannot jeopardize the ability to provide the RadioReference services by allowing this activity to occur. Please respect this.

Aluminum Round Tube 6061-T6 1.500 OD. X 0.250 Wall thickness for 18’ 6” to 20, antenna mast. What do you think?

63Sprint

Member
Joined
Mar 18, 2024
Messages
38
I have an opportunity to purchase a 24 foot length of Aluminum Round Tube 6061-T6 1.500 OD. X 0.250 Wall thickness for 18-1/2 foot antenna mast. I was reading that the the antenna might possibly act as a dipole if the pole length is the same length of the antenna. Is this true.?

I am able to store a 20 foot length of this tubing under the trailer strapped to the frame with no issues. I believe it’s seamless tubing.

Does anybody know how strong it would be? Im thinking of making two rigid guy struts that will mount 10 feet up on the pole. And, the guy poles will mount directly to the outside front corners of the trailer frame. The guy poles will have adjustable tie-rod ends so the antenna can be easily adjusted and kept plumb. So, in theory, there will be a rigid triangular structure holding the pole. I’m thinking that this setup might hold up to just about anything that we might see. I figure that it will take more abuse than what the antenna is capable of handling.

The tubing is at a friends shop and I can get it at the fraction of original cost. A 20 foot length weighs 23 pounds.

If this pole is way bigger than what I need there is also a 20 foot length of
Aluminum Pipe 6061-T6 1.000” Schedule 80 (1.315 OD X 0.179 Wall )
around 15 lbs. On the plus side of the 1 inch SCH 80 pipe, it’s about 8 pounds lighter. That is a huge difference in weight. And it will be much easier to put up.

Please give your thoughts and opinions.

Thanks
 
Last edited:

prcguy

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jun 30, 2006
Messages
16,345
Location
So Cal - Richardson, TX - Tewksbury, MA
If an antenna is not adequately decoupled from the feed line or mast they can become parasitic radiators. The Antron A99 and a few others are notorious for this. I think a 9ft or 1/4 wave resonant length of mast would be more of a problem being very low impedance on one end where an 18ft mast would be 1/2 wavelength long and very high impedance trying to couple “loose“ RF into the end.

Why not look at thick fiberglass telescoping mast sections, you should be able to get something like a three section that is maybe 7ft collapsed and about 20ft tall extended and very light weight. I would try for a top section 1 1/4” to 1 1/2” dia or up to whatever’s the largest size your antenna can take.

Here is one that is 25ft and collapses to about 4ft and has a 1” dia top section. You can build them any way you want with less longer sections and larger dia top sections. One nice thing about using insulated masts is you can put a good choke balun at the antenna connector and there is no metal mast to become a parasitic radiator.


 

63Sprint

Member
Joined
Mar 18, 2024
Messages
38
I’m a little lost, I thought an aluminum mast would be a good thing for the ProComm, Proton, PT99. 1/2 wave antenna.

I see I have more to learn because I don’t understand what would be best.

The aluminum tubing would cost me $40.00. A friend has had it in his garage for over 20 years. But if it won’t work I won’t bother with it.

You mentioned that the antenna has to be decoupled from the mast. I’ve seen insulated mast/antenna clamps. Is this what is used? Or, it will still not be good enough?

Would these work to decouple the antenna from a mast?
 

63Sprint

Member
Joined
Mar 18, 2024
Messages
38
One nice thing about using insulated masts is you can put a good choke balun at the antenna connector and there is no metal mast to become a parasitic radiator.

prcguy,
Is it possible to explain in simple terms what you wrote. I’m embarrassed to say that I do not understand what you wrote.
I’m really see how much of a novice I am with antennas. I thought it would be easy to put one up. And now I see that I pretty much know very little on properly installing an antenna.
 

slowmover

Active Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2020
Messages
2,759
Location
Fort Worth
My budget has been too constrained by vehicle repairs to continue several radio projects at present.


At radio end used @prcguy recommendation of:


Plus

Toroid wound for antenna feedpoint per ferrite cookbook and advice seen in thread.

Devices I’m replacing prove this SNR approach to both coax ends being worthwhile in my experience in mobile. I’ll also be applying it to my RV portable set-up, as well as to my pickup.


.
 
Last edited:
Top