ai8o
Brachiating Tetrapod
Radio Amateur Dxing.
Some random observations.
--.- … - -.. . .- .. -… ---
Some random observations.
--.- … - -.. . .- .. -… ---
Annoying things:
1) Hams who use voice machines instead of their own voice during contests, who just activate the machines over, and over again, and don’t stop to listen.
I heard one Dutch ham repeatedly activate his voice machine without breaking to listen, for over three minutes, and that is just the time I actually timed him.
2) On weekends, when there are many different contests going on at the same time, hams who call “CQ CONTEST’, and never say what contest they are working. They should say: “CQ CONTEST PACC” or “CQ CONTEST Vermont QSO Party”, etc.
QSLing:
1) LOTW vs. QRZ
QRZ is the better service.
I enter every contact I make into QRZ and LOTW.
I get more QSLs from QRZ than I get from LOTW.
I calculated QSL percentages on both:
QRZ= 59%
LOTW=46%.
13% difference in favor of QRZ.
2)You would think that LOTW which says it is the "National Association for Amateur Radio"; would have a better percentage of responses than QRZ a private concern.
I guess that subscribers who pay for enhanced service at QRZ, are more likely to post a confirmation of a QSO.
ARRL’s much more cumbersome, more complicated, sign up protocol requiring waiting for a post card, and downloading the TQSL app is deterring hams, especially NON-USA hams, from signing up for LOTW.
3) Unfortunately, the idea of sending QSL cards is slowly decaying. Mail costs are too high, especially sending cards internationally.
4) I don’t mind sending a couple green stamps to hams in rare countries to defray postage costs for QSLs, but one ham in Surinam wants 5 Euros to do a confirmation on LOTW.
5) QSL Bureaus are great.
They save money, and make QSLing not so expensive.
I wish they were faster, but since they depend on volunteers, I am not going to complain.
6) NetLogger is great.
I always use it when working various nets.
I just wish I could download to LOTW and QRZ directly from it, but again I will not complain, because it is freeware written by volunteers.
Propagation:
1) The idea of only working below 10 MHz at night and above 10MHZ during the day is just not a good practice.
I often work Europe and Russia (west of the Ural mountains) at 2-5 AM EST from my location on the east coast of the USA.
Its 7AM to 12 noon there, and the sun is shining on the eastern part of the Atlantic, significantly raising the MUF.
One of my most amazing mornings was in April 2022.
I was trolling thru 20m, and not paying close attention to what I was hearing.
I thought I was hearing hams in Italy working British Columbia (Vee A)
All of a sudden; I realized that the Italians were working an Australian net (Vee K).
I worked four Australian stations via long path in less than 4 minutes.
2) My propagation Doughnut hole:
I work few stations in the area between my ground wave coverage, and where my signal comes down after bouncing off the Ionosphere.
Depending on the band; this dead zone extends from the edge of my ground wave coverage areaof about 25 miles, to several hundred miles. I didn’t realize this for a long time, because I am in North Carolina near the east coast of North America, and over 120 degrees of the dead zone arc is over water, and you wouldn’t expect to work stations on the ocean.
West of the Mississippi River is easy, Eastern Tennessee, Southern West Virginia & Virginia, and most of South Carolina are hard for me to contact.
Growing the number of hams:
1) Various organizations that are intent on recruiting, and RETAINING, new hams should concentrate on men in their 30s and 40s.
Guys who are settled down, in long term relationships, have a house, and have kids who are out of diapers.
2) Trying to recruit teens is NOT a long term growth strategy. As soon as these guys discover cars and girls, or go off to college, they will lose interest.
I am not saying to ignore them, because maybe a few of them, will later in life settle down, and rekindle their interest in radio.
3) Hams are overwhelmingly male.
Women are not encouraged to deal with things/technology.
They are mostly directed by cultural expectations toward interpersonal relationships and homemaking, not technological experimentation.
4) I don’t know what to do to recruit more female hams.
5) Amateur radio especially HF DXing is expensive. Land for antennas, equipment, transmitter costs, etc.
What can be done to reduce the costs of getting started in HF DXing.
Language:
1) Most of the Americas south of the Rio Grand speak Spanish.
Habla en Espanol when answering CQ calls, greatly increases my chances of getting a response. “Esta es AH EE OCHO OH”, “COMO SE INDICATIVO?” and ”SEE-AY-TAY TRACE” greatly enhances my QSO numbers.
Ham populations:
1) The ratio of HF Dxers to the numbers of licensed hams in a country is not proportional in various countries.
2)Most DX contacts are done in English.
The lack of English fluency reduces the number of NON -US hams DXing.
2) Take Japan for example. They have the most hams of any DX entity (around 1.2 million hams), but I have only worked two Japanese stations.
Both Japanese stations I have worked, the language used was English.
4) Most Asian countries (except INDIA) have low ham populations, and consequently even lower active Dxers.
5) Do North Korea (P5), Afghanistan (T6), or the Vatican (HV) have any active hams or Dxers?
6) On the other hand I have had 5 QSOs with Luxembourg, which is way over the proprtion of contacts I would expect do to their low numbers of hams.
7) Italy is another country that is very active. I can work Italy just about any time a band is open.
Bad Behavior:
1) drunks arguing late at night arguing.
2) Cranky old farts and their buddies that think they "OWN" a frequency, because they say they have used it for years.
3) Even worse is a drunk old fart.
I would love to read your comments and queries.
73
Dan
AI8O