QRMs and Professional Rack-mounted HF Receivers vs. Hobby Grade Ones

yahya

Member
Joined
Apr 6, 2020
Messages
48
You have likely never given it a really challenge like a very weak station next to a very strong one and then use all the features. For many listeners and what they do, your experience might be typical. Or compare the HF+ to any of the others using a YouLoop antenna (not the cheaper Chinese copy), one quickly sees the sensitivity difference. You can only compare using something hard to receive. I would expect the 8600 and duo to do well but my tests have the HF+ doing better. The dou should be better than the 8600 in dynamic range and I would give it 2nd place. The R8600 of curse does not need a PC but is a step down (yes, I know some will argue). I back shelved the R30 simply because I could always grab one of my 4 HF+ Discovery (or Airspy R2 for VHF/UHF) and do better.

Do you use your Airspy HF+ Discovery only with the small portable loop antennas, or something larger eg. on rooftop or between trees? Did you observe instances, when strong signals in vicinity can 'stun' the receiver?
 

dlwtrunked

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
2,464
Do you use your Airspy HF+ Discovery only with the small portable loop antennas, or something larger eg. on rooftop or between trees? Did you observe instances, when strong signals in vicinity can 'stun' the receiver?
I use various other antenna go from HF down to VLF. A from tower at 30 ft to tree, and LF Engineering active E-field antenna (similar are on eBay) on the peak of the roof but I constantly relocate it looking for minimal noise. For the car, I uses various whip type. I use the loops most when DFing. I also have used some Wellbrook loops (company is gone) but those are now in storage.
 

yahya

Member
Joined
Apr 6, 2020
Messages
48
I see. What was the reason that you abandoned the Wellbrook MLAs?

Well, there is an interesting website of a serious SWLer from Switzerland. He elaborated the Airspy HF+, and it seems that the original unit lacked the preselector, which seems to have been a must. More details are here:


The newer Airspy HF+ Discovery was already updated with the preselector:


I wonder how that receiver operates in real life in a heavy interference environment like a big city.

That SWLer also tested an off-the-shelf preselector for the enthusiasts, which seems to be an interesting add-on for various HF receivers:

 
Top