• To anyone looking to acquire commercial radio programming software:

    Please do not make requests for copies of radio programming software which is sold (or was sold) by the manufacturer for any monetary value. All requests will be deleted and a forum infraction issued. Making a request such as this is attempting to engage in software piracy and this forum cannot be involved or associated with this activity. The same goes for any private transaction via Private Message. Even if you attempt to engage in this activity in PM's we will still enforce the forum rules. Your PM's are not private and the administration has the right to read them if there's a hint to criminal activity.

    If you are having trouble legally obtaining software please state so. We do not want any hurt feelings when your vague post is mistaken for a free request. It is YOUR responsibility to properly word your request.

    To obtain Motorola software see the Sticky in the Motorola forum.

    The various other vendors often permit their dealers to sell the software online (i.e., Kenwood). Please use Google or some other search engine to find a dealer that sells the software. Typically each series or individual radio requires its own software package. Often the Kenwood software is less than $100 so don't be a cheapskate; just purchase it.

    For M/A Com/Harris/GE, etc: there are two software packages that program all current and past radios. One package is for conventional programming and the other for trunked programming. The trunked package is in upwards of $2,500. The conventional package is more reasonable though is still several hundred dollars. The benefit is you do not need multiple versions for each radio (unlike Motorola).

    This is a large and very visible forum. We cannot jeopardize the ability to provide the RadioReference services by allowing this activity to occur. Please respect this.

Antenna advice

RealCowboy

Newbie
Joined
Jan 12, 2026
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I'm currently using approximately 25 mobile Kenwood VHF radios in the 160 MHZ range using a mixture of Maxrad MHB 5802 and Tram 1159 antennas.
The maxrads are 20 years old and the trams are slightly newer and both were cut to be tuned to the 160 MHZ range.
I am in the process of adding a repeater which will be in the 140 MHZ range and I will also have a talkaround channel so I plan on eliminating the 160 MHZ channel.


To tune the antennas to the 140 MHZ range they have to be longer so I will need to get different whips.

Seeing as the antennas are that old my dilemma is should I just get different antennas or should I replace the whips.
If I do replace the antennas should I go with a different brand antenna.

Just thought I'd ask some more knowledgeable people and TIA.
 

RealCowboy

Newbie
Joined
Jan 12, 2026
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
The reason I'm asking is there seems to be be a low opinion on the tram 1159 so I'm wondering if I go to a better quality mobile antenna can I expect more range.
 

mmckenna

I ♥ Ø
Joined
Jul 27, 2005
Messages
27,833
Reaction score
34,485
Location
United States
The reason I'm asking is there seems to be be a low opinion on the tram 1159 so I'm wondering if I go to a better quality mobile antenna can I expect more range.

Tram is popular in the hobby world due to price. They have some good products, but I personally do not believe the minor cost savings is really worth it. I've been doing this professionally for a few decades and one of the things I learned early on is that the antenna is the most important part of a radio system, and it should be the last place you cut costs.

Sounds like you are in Canada, so pricing/availability will be different than what I've got down here.
Larsen has been my go to mobile antenna for decades, and they've never let me down. I've got a lot of them on police vehicles, public works as well as my own vehicles. I've never had one let me down.
Problem is, most vendors have cranked the prices on them recently. Used to be they were affordable, but now some dealers have them priced really high. Still, a good antenna.

I've recently started using a lot of EM Wave antennas. I'm very happy with them, they are durable and well built. Prices are reasonable.

I'd take the opportunity to replace the antennas at this point, rather than just the whips. If these antennas have been out there this long, there may be some hidden issues once you start looking at them. I'd be concerned about the gaskets rotting over time. Just replacing the whip would be the cheap/easy option, but I think it would be well worth just getting them all updated at once.
Take a good look under the antennas when you replace them. Look for any signs of damage, moisture, corrosion, etc.
 

RealCowboy

Newbie
Joined
Jan 12, 2026
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Thank you for taking time to answer my questions.


25% of my vehicles rooftops are steel and 75 % are fiberglass.

My antennas are all mounted using a NMO mount but most of them are mounted on the side of the vehicle on mirrors or on brackets beside the hood.

Seeing as most of my cabs are fiberglass is there an advantage to mounting a NGP antenna in the middle of a fibreglass cab or will it perform just as well on a bracket beside the cab?

If an NGP antenna is mounted on a steel roof does it perform better than it would on a fiberglass roof?
 

mmckenna

I ♥ Ø
Joined
Jul 27, 2005
Messages
27,833
Reaction score
34,485
Location
United States
Seeing as most of my cabs are fiberglass is there an advantage to mounting a NGP antenna in the middle of a fibreglass cab or will it perform just as well on a bracket beside the cab?

If there's zero ground plane under the antenna, then it doesn't matter where you mount them. But I'd focus on getting them on top of the vehicle so they have a clear 360º view. Down below roof line is going to result in shadowing.

If an NGP antenna is mounted on a steel roof does it perform better than it would on a fiberglass roof?

Yes.
A no ground plane antenna (usually a 1/2 wave design) will have 0dBi gain when it is not mounted directly on a ground plane.
If you mount the same 1/2 wave antenna over a suitable ground plane, the antenna will now exhibit 2.1dBi of gain since the ground plane now helps focus more of the RF energy towards the horizon.


Half wave antennas are great problem solvers for some applications, but whenever possible get them mounted over some metal. Even on your fiberglass roof vehicles, a piece of sheet metal under the antenna, foil, screen, even an "X" shape of something conductive directly under the antenna will improve performance.
 
Top