• To anyone looking to acquire commercial radio programming software:

    Please do not make requests for copies of radio programming software which is sold (or was sold) by the manufacturer for any monetary value. All requests will be deleted and a forum infraction issued. Making a request such as this is attempting to engage in software piracy and this forum cannot be involved or associated with this activity. The same goes for any private transaction via Private Message. Even if you attempt to engage in this activity in PM's we will still enforce the forum rules. Your PM's are not private and the administration has the right to read them if there's a hint to criminal activity.

    If you are having trouble legally obtaining software please state so. We do not want any hurt feelings when your vague post is mistaken for a free request. It is YOUR responsibility to properly word your request.

    To obtain Motorola software see the Sticky in the Motorola forum.

    The various other vendors often permit their dealers to sell the software online (i.e., Kenwood). Please use Google or some other search engine to find a dealer that sells the software. Typically each series or individual radio requires its own software package. Often the Kenwood software is less than $100 so don't be a cheapskate; just purchase it.

    For M/A Com/Harris/GE, etc: there are two software packages that program all current and past radios. One package is for conventional programming and the other for trunked programming. The trunked package is in upwards of $2,500. The conventional package is more reasonable though is still several hundred dollars. The benefit is you do not need multiple versions for each radio (unlike Motorola).

    This is a large and very visible forum. We cannot jeopardize the ability to provide the RadioReference services by allowing this activity to occur. Please respect this.

Antenna coaxial cable

Edge13579

Newbie
Joined
Mar 16, 2026
Messages
4
Reaction score
6
I need an antenna coax that is flexible for my base. The length is around 55 feet. Thanks in advance fellows
 

K6GBW

Member
Joined
May 29, 2016
Messages
1,093
Reaction score
1,970
Location
Montebello, CA
DXE-400MAX is pretty flexible, it's just under a half inch thick though. If you need thinner then LMR240 or RG8X. The LMR has solid core so it can't do sharp bends but its a tiny bit better than RG8X.
 

K4EET

Chaplain
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Feb 18, 2015
Messages
2,888
Reaction score
2,085
Location
Severn, Maryland, USA
Times Microwave LMR-400 (similar to DX Engineering DXE-400MAX) at 27.185 MHz running 4 Watts with a coax length of 55 feet has a loss of 0.357 dB (cost at about $1.50 per foot or $82.50 total)

Belden 9258 (similar to generic RG-8X) at 27.185 MHz running 4 Watts with a coax length of 55 feet has a loss of 0.875 dB (cost at about $0.65 per foot or $35.75 total)

The difference in loss over the 55 foot coax distance is 0.518 dB or 0.414 Watts
The difference in cost of the coax cable is $46.75

You will need to weigh the cost differential versus the performance differential. These numbers are approximations so you will need to do your own analysis to come up with the exact losses and costs based on the vendor source of the cable for costs and their specific loss per 100 feet of coax with their cables.

Let us know if you have any questions.
 

MUTNAV

Active Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jul 27, 2018
Messages
1,565
Reaction score
1,654
DXE-400MAX is pretty flexible, it's just under a half inch thick though. If you need thinner then LMR240 or RG8X. The LMR has solid core so it can't do sharp bends but its a tiny bit better than RG8X.
I was under the impression that solid insulation is better to keep the center conductor from drifting over to the side eventually (assuming it can make the bend to begin with).

Thanks
Joel
 

K4EET

Chaplain
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Feb 18, 2015
Messages
2,888
Reaction score
2,085
Location
Severn, Maryland, USA
I was under the impression that solid insulation is better to keep the center conductor from drifting over to the side eventually (assuming it can make the bend to begin with).

Thanks
Joel
Hi Joel,

By “solid insulation” I think you are referring to the foam dielectric material that separates the center conductor from the shielding. The foam dielectric material is basically the same for both the RG-8X and LMR-400 type coax cables. The foam dielectric is sufficient to keep the center conductor from “moving” towards the shield as long as the minimum bending radius is observed.

As for minimum bending radius, RG-8X is about 2.5 inches and LMR-400 is about 1 inch for a single bend. However, for multiple bends of LMR-400, the minimum bending radius increases to about 4 inches.

Does that answer your question?
 

mmckenna

I ♥ Ø
Joined
Jul 27, 2005
Messages
28,083
Reaction score
35,291
Location
United States
I need an antenna coax that is flexible for my base. The length is around 55 feet. Thanks in advance fellows

Why/where is the flexibility needed?

Most hobby/consumer sized cable will be sufficient in residential installation. Usually the challenge is making the final connection to the radio. Running LMR-400 or larger can be done in those cases, and then just use a short RG-58 or similar jumper to connect to the radio.
This is usually how you'll see it done in commercial installations. Often larger coax/hardline is used, and short jumper makes the final connection. The short whip of smaller coax adds a negligible amount of loss, and protects the antenna jack on your radio.
 
Top