Antenna inside attic vs. outside roof

Status
Not open for further replies.

pro2096HI

Analog kinda guy, surviving in a digital world
Joined
Jun 23, 2009
Messages
22
You need 2 antennas. For the shortwave an end feeed or a dipole is fine. Discone for your scanner. No such thing as an antenna for entire spectrum.

Make sure everything is well grounded. The radio too.
 

jonwienke

More Info Coming Soon!
Joined
Jul 18, 2014
Messages
13,409
Location
VA
Ground plane antenna are great for a specific band or two, but will have gaps in between them.
 

prcguy

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jun 30, 2006
Messages
16,325
Location
So Cal - Richardson, TX - Tewksbury, MA
I think a good setup for the OP would be a scanner type Discone and an active loop for VLF through HF. They should both fit within a attic and I've found once you map out some stuff with the loop you can usually park it and not have to rotate it. I believe it will also give a lower noise floor than a wire antenna stretched the length of a house inside an attic and you can adjust the loop to null noise out or favor certain directions where you can't with a wire.

You could start with a lower end Discone from Tram or Harvest at around $40 and if this is a test for a hobby that might stick or fade away, you could also go with a cheap Chinese active loop at around $40. Those are getting ok reviews for the price. Otherwise I would highly recommend the W6LVP loop but at a much higher cost around $250. This all depends of course on the layout of the attic and if the roofing material is fairly RF transparent or if its got foil backed insulation or too much AC ducting or wiring running around.

For amateur use the Discone could be used for 2m, 220 and 440 transmitting and receiving. For HF you would have to go with another antenna but there are various transmitting loops that can cover the 40 through 10m range with varying sized and price. An dipole or end fed in the attic is possible but its certainly going to run very close to ducting and wiring which will degrade its performance and increase noise pickup.

Depending on the height of the attic, you could also use an HF screwdriver over a bunch of chicken wire as a ground plane. You could probably set one up in less that 5ft of height by doing some tricks and without loosing any performance.
 

rapidcharger

Member
Joined
Jun 13, 2012
Messages
2,382
Location
The land of broken calculators.
There's a third option other than mounting the lighting rod- er I mean antenna to your roof of your combustible dwelling or in the attic and that's to use a mast (or tower) out in the yard, preferably as far away from your house (sources of RFI) as possible and easier to ground it. If you're just wanting to monitor, especially HF, personally I think it would make more sense to get that antenna farther away from the house than to go up a measly 30' which, unless you live in a perfectly flat, treeless place, is really small potatoes.
I never understood why people mount antennas and things like satellite dishes to their roofs when they don't have to. It's hard to access to install and inspect, it's still too close to the house and it's somewhat dangerous.
 

jonwienke

More Info Coming Soon!
Joined
Jul 18, 2014
Messages
13,409
Location
VA
I never understood why people mount antennas and things like satellite dishes to their roofs when they don't have to. It's hard to access to install and inspect, it's still too close to the house and it's somewhat dangerous.
Probably because at frequencies above HF, running coax across the yard generally means the coax loss eats up all the signal gain from getting the antenna up and outside, unless you're running really expensive hardline or something. Getting as much elevation as possible while keeping the coax run as short as possible dictates keeping the antenna near the house.
 

rapidcharger

Member
Joined
Jun 13, 2012
Messages
2,382
Location
The land of broken calculators.
Probably because at frequencies above HF, running coax across the yard generally means the coax loss eats up all the signal gain from getting the antenna up and outside, unless you're running really expensive hardline or something. Getting as much elevation as possible while keeping the coax run as short as possible dictates keeping the antenna near the house.

Running coax across your yard isn't going to eat up all the signal. And if you use a decent antenna with some gain to help compensate for any signal loss. You also might not need as much power once you get away from the epicenter of RFI.
 

jonwienke

More Info Coming Soon!
Joined
Jul 18, 2014
Messages
13,409
Location
VA
Running coax across your yard isn't going to eat up all the signal.
For UHF and 800MHz, it definitely will, unless you're running LMR600 or better. Or you have a really tiny yard. 250 feet of LMR400 has over 9dB of loss at 800MHz. Also, RFI is less of an issue once you go above 100MHz, so there's a lot less reason to move the tower/mast away from the house.
 

Indie

Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2020
Messages
26
Yeah I'm not putting up a tower. Good point about lightning though. What do we do about lightning?
 

jonwienke

More Info Coming Soon!
Joined
Jul 18, 2014
Messages
13,409
Location
VA
Ground your mast and antenna properly, and if lightning hits it, most of the energy will be directed down the mast instead of into the house.

 

rapidcharger

Member
Joined
Jun 13, 2012
Messages
2,382
Location
The land of broken calculators.
For UHF and 800MHz, it definitely will, unless you're running LMR600 or better. Or you have a really tiny yard. 250 feet of LMR400 has over 9dB of loss at 800MHz. Also, RFI is less of an issue once you go above 100MHz, so there's a lot less reason to move the tower/mast away from the house.
My yard is 20 acres and I'm not even running 250' of coax. And while you have over 9db of loss on 800 mhz (Not sure what the need for a base station antenna is for that anyway considering the fortunes spent for in-building body worn portable coverage), it's still over 6 with LMR-600. I'm not sure if I mentioned this in this thread or a different one but the extra cost for lmr-600 is usually not justified.
 

Indie

Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2020
Messages
26
My mast is not grounded. Currently there is some sort of anemometer and box up there with a thin wire, like phone line, coming down.
 

Indie

Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2020
Messages
26
I see how to ground the mast and antenna so it's up to code. What is not clear is what this will do for reception/transmition? Will it help or hurt the signal?
 

jonwienke

More Info Coming Soon!
Joined
Jul 18, 2014
Messages
13,409
Location
VA
Grounding for lightning protection may not have any noticeable effect on reception. It won't hurt it, but it isn't likely to improve it, either. You do it because you want to minimize damage from lightning, not because it improves reception.
 

prcguy

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jun 30, 2006
Messages
16,325
Location
So Cal - Richardson, TX - Tewksbury, MA

a417

Active Member
Joined
Mar 14, 2004
Messages
4,669
My mast is not grounded. Currently there is some sort of anemometer and box up there with a thin wire, like phone line, coming down.
Do you own or rent?

I only ask because it sounds like you are not sure what is installed on your residence...
 

jimbrogers

Member
Joined
Jan 10, 2009
Messages
58
Location
Ramona, CA
Wish I could go on roof with mine, my HOA prevents any kind of outside antennas, scanner, ham radio, TV.
So I am moving mine into the attic.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top