Paysonscanner
Active Member
- Joined
- Mar 1, 2019
- Messages
- 650
I want to update the Arizona RR Database page. I have a lot of official agency frequency directory information that needs over the air confirmations. I expect this thread to be one of several given the time my Daddy and I have.
Please take a listen to the National Forests in Arizona to confirm the following. What needs to be confirmed is in bold text.
Apache-Sitgreaves National Forests (A-S)
This is one national forest under one forest supervisor in Springerville. The portion of the Apache National Forest in New Mexico is administered by the Gila NF our of Silver City, New Mexico. This administrative combination was completed in 1974, this is nothing new. Dispatch is provided by the Show Low Interagency Dispatch Center. This forest has one comm system, with one net for the west, used for the ranger districts on the old Sitgreaves National Forest and one net for the east, used for the Arizona ranger districts of the old Apache National Forest. I've submitted this info once before, but the admin insisted that these be shown as two different forests. This is inconsistent with the remainder of the database as there are many administratively combined national forests in other states listed as one entity. Examples, Mt Baker-Snoqualmie NF in Washington, Beaverhead-Deerlodge NF in Montana and the Arapahoe-Roosevelt NF in Colorado. Why the database admin wants to show the Apache and Sitgreaves NF's in Arizona as separate national forests is a mystery to me. Do other RR members thing it should be listed as one forest?
Anyway, what I want to confirm for this forest if dispatch still uses the call sign "KOC 283" as they did when dispatch was in Springerville or if they use "KOC 221" as dispatch is now in Show Low and the mountaintop link they use from there has that call sign.
The database shows the repeaters the official directory has, but that directory does not show tones transmitted on the repeater output. Are these tones transmitted and different for each repeater?
The new, as of today, listing for the "Apache-Sitgreaves National Forest" only lists the USFS Region 3 (AZ & NM) assigned tactical frequencies that are listed under "Common Use" on the same page, so this new listing is redundant and confusing. Should this new Apache-Sitgreaves National Forest 3 frequency listing be deleted?
My info does not show each repeater transmitting a PL tone on each repeater output, is a PL actually transmitted on these repeaters?
Coconino National Forest - Are they still using "KOC 437" for dispatch? It's been some years since I was in Flagstaff to listen to this forest. I also see some possible errors in the listing. The directs are shown wrong. They should not be a repeater pair as shown. It should show,
171.4250 North Direct
171.4250 164.0750 North Repeaters
172.3000 South Direct
172.3000 164.8750 South Repeaters
The inputs and outputs for each repeater are shown backwards in the database. Is the above listing correct?
In addition there are north repeaters located at O'Leary, East Pocket, Saddle, Hutch, Mt. Elden, Schnebly and Moqui. South has repeaters at Mingus, Squaw, East Pocket, Baker Butte, Hutch, Schnebly, Moqui and Ike's/Fossil. In Payson we can hear Baker Butte pretty well, but the rest are either full of noise or don't break squelch. I have not heard a tone transmitted on the output of each repeater, is this correct?
The air to ground frequency of 171.5750 is old and not used anymore. The correct frequencies are shown in the database under the Initial Attack Zone 1 -Flagstaff Dispatch Center. The 171.5750 is obsolete, is this correct?
Coronado National Forest - Is dispatch using "KOC 435" or "KOG 785" or some other call sign?
The RRDB shows 168.6000 as a "ops direct" frequency. This is actually NIFC Tac 3. My info shows 168.1500 being used for portable repeaters with a 172.2750 input. With the new NTIA assignments of the VHF High Band, it would seem that this should be reversed, however 168.1500 is a logical choice for a tac freq to be used on the forest. Has anyone heard 168.1500 being used as a tactical, or hear it used for a on scene tactical repeater?
Kaibab National Forest - Is dispatch using "KOC 421" or "KOC 422?" They used "422" for many years, but again, I haven't been there in awhile. The channel list should read,
170.5500 North Direct
170.5500 164.9375 North Repeaters
172.2500 South Direct
172.2500 164.1000 South Repeaters
Is this the correct frequency and channel use?
The database shows this with the inputs reversed as to which repeater net they are assigned to. There are repeaters on the north net at Jacob Lake, Dry Park, Big Springs, Big Ridge, South Canyon and Kanab Hill. The south net has repeaters at South Canyon, Red Hill, Bill Williams, Red Butte, and Grandview. My information shows that they don't transmit a PL tone on the repeater output. Is this still the case?
Prescott National Forest - Last time I heard they were using the call sign "KOC 423" at dispatch. Is this still the case?
The database shows 135.6750 for air to air, but the Initial Attack Zone 7 - Prescott Dispatch Center shows this as the third to be used in this zone. Should we delete it from the Prescott National Forest listing as it is misleading to show only one of the zone's air to air frequencies?
The database shows 135.975 for the Prescott Tanker base. Our info shows 123.975 being the air tanker base frequency for all of Arizona. Is 135.975 in use for the Prescott Tanker Base?
Tonto National Forest - I hear them using "KOC 286" Does anyone else hear them use a different call sign? We don't hear all the repeaters on the forest, the repeater at Humboldt is problematic with our current, repairs badly needed, antennas here. So we need a little help.
The RRDB listing shows 126.325 for air to air and just like the Prescott this is the third AA frequency to be used in Initial Attack Zone 6 - Phoenix Dispatch Center and is shown in those listings. Should this be deleted?
170.0000 is listed as an air to ground. The initial attack zone has the correct air to ground listings in the RRDB. This frequency has been reassigned as the output for the NIFC Command 4 repeater pair. Is it still in use on the Tonto as an air to ground? We haven't heard it here.
I've made a submission to delete 5 frequencies as listed in the RRDB AZ federal listing under "Common Use," based on other info I have. This includes all of those shown with "Large Fire Support" in the description. The commands are already in the NIFC system or are assigned nationally as air-air, air-ground or tactical frequencies as needed. The 2 air to grounds listed 166.0875 and 166.3375 are likely to have been assigned to a large incident on a one time assignment. They don't need to be listed under Common Use as they may not be used again or will show up on a fire in the future. We can't list all of these in the RRDB as they might get used again or might not. Members have posted hearing dozens of similar frequencies in use around the nation.
I have a lot of things that need confirmation. I've spent a great deal of time with this thread in an effort to make the DB as accurate as we can. The fire season has started here in Arizona, so as is often said please "observe and report!"
I have a lot of information for the BLM and the NPS that needs confirmation also. These will be the subject of some upcoming threads. Happy social distancing!
Please take a listen to the National Forests in Arizona to confirm the following. What needs to be confirmed is in bold text.
Apache-Sitgreaves National Forests (A-S)
This is one national forest under one forest supervisor in Springerville. The portion of the Apache National Forest in New Mexico is administered by the Gila NF our of Silver City, New Mexico. This administrative combination was completed in 1974, this is nothing new. Dispatch is provided by the Show Low Interagency Dispatch Center. This forest has one comm system, with one net for the west, used for the ranger districts on the old Sitgreaves National Forest and one net for the east, used for the Arizona ranger districts of the old Apache National Forest. I've submitted this info once before, but the admin insisted that these be shown as two different forests. This is inconsistent with the remainder of the database as there are many administratively combined national forests in other states listed as one entity. Examples, Mt Baker-Snoqualmie NF in Washington, Beaverhead-Deerlodge NF in Montana and the Arapahoe-Roosevelt NF in Colorado. Why the database admin wants to show the Apache and Sitgreaves NF's in Arizona as separate national forests is a mystery to me. Do other RR members thing it should be listed as one forest?
Anyway, what I want to confirm for this forest if dispatch still uses the call sign "KOC 283" as they did when dispatch was in Springerville or if they use "KOC 221" as dispatch is now in Show Low and the mountaintop link they use from there has that call sign.
The database shows the repeaters the official directory has, but that directory does not show tones transmitted on the repeater output. Are these tones transmitted and different for each repeater?
The new, as of today, listing for the "Apache-Sitgreaves National Forest" only lists the USFS Region 3 (AZ & NM) assigned tactical frequencies that are listed under "Common Use" on the same page, so this new listing is redundant and confusing. Should this new Apache-Sitgreaves National Forest 3 frequency listing be deleted?
My info does not show each repeater transmitting a PL tone on each repeater output, is a PL actually transmitted on these repeaters?
Coconino National Forest - Are they still using "KOC 437" for dispatch? It's been some years since I was in Flagstaff to listen to this forest. I also see some possible errors in the listing. The directs are shown wrong. They should not be a repeater pair as shown. It should show,
171.4250 North Direct
171.4250 164.0750 North Repeaters
172.3000 South Direct
172.3000 164.8750 South Repeaters
The inputs and outputs for each repeater are shown backwards in the database. Is the above listing correct?
In addition there are north repeaters located at O'Leary, East Pocket, Saddle, Hutch, Mt. Elden, Schnebly and Moqui. South has repeaters at Mingus, Squaw, East Pocket, Baker Butte, Hutch, Schnebly, Moqui and Ike's/Fossil. In Payson we can hear Baker Butte pretty well, but the rest are either full of noise or don't break squelch. I have not heard a tone transmitted on the output of each repeater, is this correct?
The air to ground frequency of 171.5750 is old and not used anymore. The correct frequencies are shown in the database under the Initial Attack Zone 1 -Flagstaff Dispatch Center. The 171.5750 is obsolete, is this correct?
Coronado National Forest - Is dispatch using "KOC 435" or "KOG 785" or some other call sign?
The RRDB shows 168.6000 as a "ops direct" frequency. This is actually NIFC Tac 3. My info shows 168.1500 being used for portable repeaters with a 172.2750 input. With the new NTIA assignments of the VHF High Band, it would seem that this should be reversed, however 168.1500 is a logical choice for a tac freq to be used on the forest. Has anyone heard 168.1500 being used as a tactical, or hear it used for a on scene tactical repeater?
Kaibab National Forest - Is dispatch using "KOC 421" or "KOC 422?" They used "422" for many years, but again, I haven't been there in awhile. The channel list should read,
170.5500 North Direct
170.5500 164.9375 North Repeaters
172.2500 South Direct
172.2500 164.1000 South Repeaters
Is this the correct frequency and channel use?
The database shows this with the inputs reversed as to which repeater net they are assigned to. There are repeaters on the north net at Jacob Lake, Dry Park, Big Springs, Big Ridge, South Canyon and Kanab Hill. The south net has repeaters at South Canyon, Red Hill, Bill Williams, Red Butte, and Grandview. My information shows that they don't transmit a PL tone on the repeater output. Is this still the case?
Prescott National Forest - Last time I heard they were using the call sign "KOC 423" at dispatch. Is this still the case?
The database shows 135.6750 for air to air, but the Initial Attack Zone 7 - Prescott Dispatch Center shows this as the third to be used in this zone. Should we delete it from the Prescott National Forest listing as it is misleading to show only one of the zone's air to air frequencies?
The database shows 135.975 for the Prescott Tanker base. Our info shows 123.975 being the air tanker base frequency for all of Arizona. Is 135.975 in use for the Prescott Tanker Base?
Tonto National Forest - I hear them using "KOC 286" Does anyone else hear them use a different call sign? We don't hear all the repeaters on the forest, the repeater at Humboldt is problematic with our current, repairs badly needed, antennas here. So we need a little help.
The RRDB listing shows 126.325 for air to air and just like the Prescott this is the third AA frequency to be used in Initial Attack Zone 6 - Phoenix Dispatch Center and is shown in those listings. Should this be deleted?
170.0000 is listed as an air to ground. The initial attack zone has the correct air to ground listings in the RRDB. This frequency has been reassigned as the output for the NIFC Command 4 repeater pair. Is it still in use on the Tonto as an air to ground? We haven't heard it here.
I've made a submission to delete 5 frequencies as listed in the RRDB AZ federal listing under "Common Use," based on other info I have. This includes all of those shown with "Large Fire Support" in the description. The commands are already in the NIFC system or are assigned nationally as air-air, air-ground or tactical frequencies as needed. The 2 air to grounds listed 166.0875 and 166.3375 are likely to have been assigned to a large incident on a one time assignment. They don't need to be listed under Common Use as they may not be used again or will show up on a fire in the future. We can't list all of these in the RRDB as they might get used again or might not. Members have posted hearing dozens of similar frequencies in use around the nation.
I have a lot of things that need confirmation. I've spent a great deal of time with this thread in an effort to make the DB as accurate as we can. The fire season has started here in Arizona, so as is often said please "observe and report!"
I have a lot of information for the BLM and the NPS that needs confirmation also. These will be the subject of some upcoming threads. Happy social distancing!