So I am trying to understand the 'power' and flexibility of the GRE's memory format. Let's ignore V-Folders for a moment and focus on the active bank. I understand there are 1800 objects that can be assigned to 20 virtual banks. These objects can be frequencies, talk group ids, search limits, etc.
My question (misunderstanding) is what is the real power/usage of being able to assign an object to multiple banks?
If you consider a more 'conventional' scanner, you'd assign frequencies to banks. Assume one bank was used for your local city, and another was assigned to mutual aid. If you wanted to listen to both, you'd enable both banks. If you want to listen to either individually, you could do that too. So I'm not understadning the 'flexibility' of assigning multiple things to different banks?? Why not just enable both banks?
The more I thought about it, I can understand the benefit of assigning a 'TSYS' object to multiple banks, since that eliminates real duplication. And then the 'banks' are really just subdivisions of TGIDs.
Maybe there's another advantage of assigning conventional and TRS objects into a single bank. But in the Uniden model, you could just as easily assign these to the same key.
So back at the ranch, can someone provide some real world examples as to why having a single object assigned to different banks provides some functionalty that is really better than what has been done before?
Thanks!
My question (misunderstanding) is what is the real power/usage of being able to assign an object to multiple banks?
If you consider a more 'conventional' scanner, you'd assign frequencies to banks. Assume one bank was used for your local city, and another was assigned to mutual aid. If you wanted to listen to both, you'd enable both banks. If you want to listen to either individually, you could do that too. So I'm not understadning the 'flexibility' of assigning multiple things to different banks?? Why not just enable both banks?
The more I thought about it, I can understand the benefit of assigning a 'TSYS' object to multiple banks, since that eliminates real duplication. And then the 'banks' are really just subdivisions of TGIDs.
Maybe there's another advantage of assigning conventional and TRS objects into a single bank. But in the Uniden model, you could just as easily assign these to the same key.
So back at the ranch, can someone provide some real world examples as to why having a single object assigned to different banks provides some functionalty that is really better than what has been done before?
Thanks!