ATC Radar Sites

Status
Not open for further replies.

slabonte

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Sep 9, 2009
Messages
17
Here's the sites you may see in NY:

Buffalo(Dansville) FAA ID: DSV Type: ARSR-1E
Scan Time: 10
Max Range 200
N 42.63836055555556, W 77.65306

Newark FAA ID: EWR Type: ASR-9
Scan Time: 5
Max Range: 60
N 40.673273611111114, W 74.18571277777778

White Plains FAA ID: HPN Type: ASR-9
Scan Time: 5
Max Range: 60
N 41.072786111111114, W 73.71541111111111

New York FAA ID: JFK Type: ASR-9
Scan Time: 5
Max Range: 60
N 40.63962222222222, W 73.76642777777778

Du Bois FAA ID: QCF Type: ARSR-3
Scan Time: 12
Max Range: 200
N 41.07026666666667, W 78.55041111111112

North Truro FAA ID: QEA Type: ARSR-4
Scan Time: 12
Max Range: 250
N 42.03455 W 70.05439

Cummington FAA ID: QHA Type: AN/FPS-67B
Scan Time: 12
Max Range: 200
N 42.47472 W 72.96799

Gibbsboro FAA ID: QIE Type ARSR-4
Scan Time: 12
Max Range: 250
N 39.82477055555555, W 74.95414333333333

The Plains FAA ID: QPL Type: ARSR-3
Scan Time: 12
Max Range: 200
N 38.88225 W 77.70308333333334

Benton FAA ID: QRC Type: AN/FPS-67B
Scan Time: 12
Max Range: 200
N 41.35740416666667 W 76.29298777777778

Riverhead FAA ID: QVH Type: ARSR-4
Scan Time: 12
Max Range: 250
N 40.87868 W 72.68710

Utica (Remsen) FAA ID: QXU Type: ARSR-4
Scan Time: 12
Max Range: 250
N 43.34550 W 75.24897

Newburgh (Stewart) FAA ID: SWF Type: ASR-9
Scan Time: 5
Max Range: 60
N 41.49058333333333 W 74.10566388888888

St. Albans FAA ID: QHB
Scan Time: 12
Max Range: 200
N 44.78172 W 73.06564

Bucks Harbor FAA ID: QYA
Scan Time: 12
Max Range: 250
N 44.62943 W 67.39537

Manchester FAA ID: MHT
Scan Time: 5
Max Range: 60
N 42.950013 W 71.299194


If you manage to correlate any of these to their correct II/SI identifiers, please share.
 
Last edited:

slabonte

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Sep 9, 2009
Messages
17
While trying to match up what I had with these, I came across what appears to be another one, at the old S. Weymouth NAS (42.158254 -70.933388).
 

Lynch_Christopher

Member
Database Admin
Joined
May 28, 2006
Messages
832
Location
Winthrop, Ma
While trying to match up what I had with these, I came across what appears to be another one, at the old S. Weymouth NAS (42.158254 -70.933388).

If I am not mistaken I believe that radar site at the old South Weymouth NAS is actually a NEXRAD Doppler Weather Radar (WSR88-D).
 

jfr

Member
Joined
Jan 10, 2004
Messages
76
Location
Walpole, Ma
If I am not mistaken I believe that radar site at the old South Weymouth NAS is actually a NEXRAD Doppler Weather Radar (WSR88-D).

The radar at S Weymouth is actually a Terminal Doppler Weather Radar (TDWR), the higher-freq cousin to the WSR-88D. It has higher resolution (but lower range) and is used in conjuction with large Metro Airports (Logan, in this case) to detect wind shearing.

Terminal Doppler Weather Radar - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 

bobradar

Newbie
Joined
Jan 25, 2013
Messages
1
Location
Northampton Ma
New FAA radars

Any of the sites listed with ARSR1/2 or FPS are being replaced with C.A.R.S.R. systems, which stands for Common Air Route Surveillance RADAR.

This is being done through out the country.

Also when these system are finished being upgraded the ARSR-3 RADARs will be replaced.

I went from working on a FPS for 25 years to a CARSR on 11-2012 at Cummington Massachusetts.
 
D

DaveNF2G

Guest
That explains why Cummington never shows up as a possible site in Beamfinder.
 

MikeMike

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Sep 18, 2001
Messages
60
Location
CT
Coastal CT PP GS

I am starting to dig deeper into PP after only recently starting to share 24/7 using GS id "mN". I'm interested in working on the Beamfinder / Radar locations and plan to try and correlate the sites posted above.

Just curious if anyone has done any more work on this lately and is willing to work together to get this going for the New England area?

-Mike
 
D

DaveNF2G

Guest
You should join the Planeplotter group at Yahoogroups. Beamfinder and the issues with using it in the USA have been discussed there extensively. Some locations/idenfiers in the northeastern USA and eastern Canada have been published.
 

jjwiseman

Newbie
Joined
Mar 15, 2013
Messages
3
Location
Los Angeles, CA
I have started an open directory of ATC radars at https://github.com/openairdata/atc-radar

I've used sources I found online to construct the initial version of the directory, containing 540 radars in North America and Europe, and it's my hope that by keeping it in one place, making it open for anyone to use, and making it easy for everyone to add new information or fix mistakes that it will become a useful and up-to-date resource for everyone.
 
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
493
Location
Colorado
I have started an open directory of ATC radars at https://github.com/openairdata/atc-radar

I've used sources I found online to construct the initial version of the directory, containing 540 radars in North America and Europe, and it's my hope that by keeping it in one place, making it open for anyone to use, and making it easy for everyone to add new information or fix mistakes that it will become a useful and up-to-date resource for everyone.

I must be missing something. I have gone to that link and cant figure out how to display the list. Where am I going wrong?
 

jjwiseman

Newbie
Joined
Mar 15, 2013
Messages
3
Location
Los Angeles, CA
I must be missing something. I have gone to that link and cant figure out how to display the list. Where am I going wrong?

First, I moved the repository to https://github.com/open-air-data/atc-radar (I left a short message at the original URL with the new URL).

The actual data file is at https://github.com/open-air-data/atc-radar/blob/master/data/radars.geojson If you go to that URL you will see the data displayed on a map. To see the raw data, click the "raw" button or go to https://raw.github.com/open-air-data/atc-radar/master/data/radars.geojson
 

fourwatt

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jul 31, 2012
Messages
2
It would be nice to find this information for Alaska.
It seems that they keep he information stored other then where they keep
the CONUS information.
I sent a letter to the FAA and the AirForce asking for this under the FOIA and the AirForce
refered me to the FAA which has not responded at all.
If you have any tips on where to look for this it would be greatly appreciated.
I have located the sites locations. Looking for the scan rates and II numbers.

Ken
 

Markb

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Feb 21, 2002
Messages
1,374
Location
Planet Earth
Hi all. Lots of good info coming together. Here in So Cal, I'm getting a good handle on the locations and ID's of many of the sites. My big question is whether the rotation rates are either 6 or 12 *exactly*, or is it a rounded figure. When I run the BF tool, I get some wildly fluctuating rotation rates or rates that are no where near 6 or 12. Overall I get some positive results, but still not where I would hope it to be.
Oh, and by the way, good luck trying a FOIA request from the FAA. I submitted mine a year ago and they still can't seem to find the simple data I requested.
At least with all the TIS-B traffic lighting up, I almost don't need BF :)

Mark
Sharer "ba"
 

kma371

QRT
Joined
Feb 20, 2001
Messages
6,204
Hi all. Lots of good info coming together. Here in So Cal, I'm getting a good handle on the locations and ID's of many of the sites. My big question is whether the rotation rates are either 6 or 12 *exactly*, or is it a rounded figure. When I run the BF tool, I get some wildly fluctuating rotation rates or rates that are no where near 6 or 12. Overall I get some positive results, but still not where I would hope it to be.
Oh, and by the way, good luck trying a FOIA request from the FAA. I submitted mine a year ago and they still can't seem to find the simple data I requested.
At least with all the TIS-B traffic lighting up, I almost don't need BF :)

Mark
Sharer "ba"

Hey Mark. I have some sites I can send you from my FOIA request. PM an email address.

Bill
zj
 
D

DaveNF2G

Guest
It does not show any sites in New York state, but there are several.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top