Julian1
Member
I've made a couple of trips to the Atlanta Airport area recently. Tried the new ATL P25 on my 996.
Lousy performance on 996. Suggestions ???? Operating conditions as follows:
I had all the talkgroups set for Digital Audio
Operated in Search mode to p/u any talkgroup
Parked stationary on Virginia Avenue
Frequencies set NFM, which I normally do
Antenex ABSCAN scanner antenna.
Very strong signal displayed - also tried w/ atennuator - no improvement.
I operated w/ P-25 in "Auto" format where the scanner automatically sets itself to best de-code audio.
I tried in "Manual" format and would adjust between 6 and 9.
I also tried in "Default" format.
I was so disappointed at the lackluster performance of my 996 on ATL system.
Got way less than 50% success and very inconsistent.
I have seen some posts that indicate GRE/Rad Shack is better at decoding.
I was told by one that scanners have trouble decoding w/ multi-site transmitters. Slight difference in digital data stream. Well, what else did the designers expect in major metropolitan areas?
Lousy performance on 996. Suggestions ???? Operating conditions as follows:
I had all the talkgroups set for Digital Audio
Operated in Search mode to p/u any talkgroup
Parked stationary on Virginia Avenue
Frequencies set NFM, which I normally do
Antenex ABSCAN scanner antenna.
Very strong signal displayed - also tried w/ atennuator - no improvement.
I operated w/ P-25 in "Auto" format where the scanner automatically sets itself to best de-code audio.
I tried in "Manual" format and would adjust between 6 and 9.
I also tried in "Default" format.
I was so disappointed at the lackluster performance of my 996 on ATL system.
Got way less than 50% success and very inconsistent.
I have seen some posts that indicate GRE/Rad Shack is better at decoding.
I was told by one that scanners have trouble decoding w/ multi-site transmitters. Slight difference in digital data stream. Well, what else did the designers expect in major metropolitan areas?