bc246t working life span in king co.

Status
Not open for further replies.

seattlescan

Member
Joined
Jan 7, 2008
Messages
5
Hello all,
I have the described scanner, and I know we are predomitally analog now. What are you're inputs for the near future. Also I'm looking for a quality leather case for this model. Is there any recomendations?
 

kellykeeton

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
May 16, 2007
Messages
579
Location
Oak Harbor, Wa
haha 2nd that, dont think the mods ever look here but go to that thread before we start this up again... and lock out this one.
 

joescanner

Just another radio geek.
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Feb 14, 2002
Messages
744
Location
Gresham, OR
All of the comments I read in the other thread lead me to the same response... The money is out there for agencies to build radio systems that are interoperable. I think we can all agree that the most interoperable radio system is something conventional with analog modulation.

However, with the continual expansion of radio systems, conventional analog is not an efficient use of the spectrum available. 800MHz is not all it's cracked up to be either, however, that is why there have been a lot of moves to narrowband the VHF and UHF spectrum, and most times these conversions also alienate analog conventional as well, since digital can do more, so to speak, with less.

Investing in a scanner that can decode P25 digital transmissions may be premature anywhere in the Pacific Northwest at this time, however, the time is coming when that technology may very well be used.

(I understand that a lot of agencies that were considering OpenSky -- I work for one -- have been advised to avoid it due to concerns that the Department of Homeland Security has about approving operating and construction grants for said systems due specifically to the lack of interoperability that those systems inherently have.)

Remember, just because P25 is currently the only open standard doesn't mean that there won't be other competing open standards. And although I may be incorrect in this assumption, because most of the more modern scanners on the market are firmware upgradable by the end-user, this could be just as easy to accomplish (assuming there's enough NVRAM to hold the codecs for each standard).

joe
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top