• To anyone looking to acquire commercial radio programming software:

    Please do not make requests for copies of radio programming software which is sold (or was sold) by the manufacturer for any monetary value. All requests will be deleted and a forum infraction issued. Making a request such as this is attempting to engage in software piracy and this forum cannot be involved or associated with this activity. The same goes for any private transaction via Private Message. Even if you attempt to engage in this activity in PM's we will still enforce the forum rules. Your PM's are not private and the administration has the right to read them if there's a hint to criminal activity.

    If you are having trouble legally obtaining software please state so. We do not want any hurt feelings when your vague post is mistaken for a free request. It is YOUR responsibility to properly word your request.

    To obtain Motorola software see the Sticky in the Motorola forum.

    The various other vendors often permit their dealers to sell the software online (i.e., Kenwood). Please use Google or some other search engine to find a dealer that sells the software. Typically each series or individual radio requires its own software package. Often the Kenwood software is less than $100 so don't be a cheapskate; just purchase it.

    For M/A Com/Harris/GE, etc: there are two software packages that program all current and past radios. One package is for conventional programming and the other for trunked programming. The trunked package is in upwards of $2,500. The conventional package is more reasonable though is still several hundred dollars. The benefit is you do not need multiple versions for each radio (unlike Motorola).

    This is a large and very visible forum. We cannot jeopardize the ability to provide the RadioReference services by allowing this activity to occur. Please respect this.

BDA AHJ saying Public Safety RSSI is ok down to -117dBm, what am I missing?

WB5UOM

Active Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Sep 5, 2022
Messages
598
Reaction score
442
Oh humm guess Im blind...thought I saw Bda...or was it if -117 then PASS meant no Bda needed?
 

prcguy

Member
Joined
Jun 30, 2006
Messages
17,702
Reaction score
13,079
Location
So Cal - Richardson, TX - Tewksbury, MA
Yes, if -117 to subscriber, then no BDA needed.

Hundreds of buildings.

TT
I can't imagine doing meaningful testing at that level inside buildings. Move a foot and its gone, move another foot and its back, sort of. And you would have to use an actual subscriber radio with stock antenna. Do the subscribers hold the radios up in their hands or are the radios on the belt? Way too many variables measuring at threshold levels.
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2008
Messages
1,724
Reaction score
766
Location
Pittsboro IN
I got these digital RX sensitivity ratings from a Motorola manual.
Band dBm
VHF -123
UHF -121
7-800 -119
Do the subscribers hold the radios up in their hands or are the radios on the belt?
Our county's 95% coverage guarantee with Motorola is the radio in the had at face level with the 1/2 wave antenna. About the only time I see
that is in a photo for a catalog or magazine cover.
 

TampaTyron

Beep Boop, Beep Boop
Joined
Feb 1, 2010
Messages
1,198
Reaction score
493
Location
Phoenix, AZ
Well, the other issue is that the county is following the -95 and 3.0 DAQ per the IFC code (2021), but the "inspector" is applying his own code to -117.

We test a building per IFC and it fails, Inspector "Passes" the building when he comes out to "take a look as it should be ok", public safety moves into the building and radios don't work, public safety rep goes to building rep, building rep comes to us to us with a "WTF?", we show the public safety and building rep our testing and the "PASS".

Now, we are in a standoff with the AHJ, Public Safety Agencies (multiple), Inspector, and Building Owner.

We have over 1550 systems in service and sometimes they are hard to implement, but this seems ludicrous.

I guess I am just venting at this point. I really apprecaite your inputs here, thank you all.

TT
 

amcferrin90

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Mar 11, 2015
Messages
310
Reaction score
102
Location
Pickerington, OH
That is a problem I don't think you can solve unless you do some prompting. It sucks because you do the right thing, then you get punished for it. The county needs to work with this guy or the state fire marshal needs to step in. All in the name of safety. He's not helping anyone.
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2008
Messages
1,724
Reaction score
766
Location
Pittsboro IN
The engineer did not specify but I'm assuming it was outdoors. I have seen AARs that mentioned the coverage testing was with the radio on the hip for firefighters, don't recall if that was under turnout gear.
 
Top