• To anyone looking to acquire commercial radio programming software:

    Please do not make requests for copies of radio programming software which is sold (or was sold) by the manufacturer for any monetary value. All requests will be deleted and a forum infraction issued. Making a request such as this is attempting to engage in software piracy and this forum cannot be involved or associated with this activity. The same goes for any private transaction via Private Message. Even if you attempt to engage in this activity in PM's we will still enforce the forum rules. Your PM's are not private and the administration has the right to read them if there's a hint to criminal activity.

    If you are having trouble legally obtaining software please state so. We do not want any hurt feelings when your vague post is mistaken for a free request. It is YOUR responsibility to properly word your request.

    To obtain Motorola software see the Sticky in the Motorola forum.

    The various other vendors often permit their dealers to sell the software online (i.e., Kenwood). Please use Google or some other search engine to find a dealer that sells the software. Typically each series or individual radio requires its own software package. Often the Kenwood software is less than $100 so don't be a cheapskate; just purchase it.

    For M/A Com/Harris/GE, etc: there are two software packages that program all current and past radios. One package is for conventional programming and the other for trunked programming. The trunked package is in upwards of $2,500. The conventional package is more reasonable though is still several hundred dollars. The benefit is you do not need multiple versions for each radio (unlike Motorola).

    This is a large and very visible forum. We cannot jeopardize the ability to provide the RadioReference services by allowing this activity to occur. Please respect this.

Bluetooth earbud that will work.

Forts

Mentor
Database Admin
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
7,070
Reaction score
1,372
Location
Ontario, Canada
That is totally bizarre that you are picking up interference like that... I've not experienced anything like that with mine at all. And I can't say that I've noticed the low/medium/high on the volume either. I'll be using mine today and will pay attention for that.
 

K9KLC

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Mar 31, 2007
Messages
2,405
Reaction score
2,524
Location
Southwest, IL
It's important to remember, that the Unication pagers were built and designed for "first responders" needing a reliable pager with the features they needed. I've talked to probably 20 or so people that carry these day in and day out and even done some programming for then on occasion and none to date have expressed any "faults" in the pager for what they use it for.

I recently sold a G4 and amplified charger to a younger fellow on a volunteer department in NC actually and he's elated with how it works. He's found absolutely no faults with it and carry's it daily.

It seems to me that at least mostly, all of the shortcomings of the pager are from people that are trying to use it as a scanning device and not its intended design purpose. (at least from what I've read here on rr). I knew exactly what I was getting when I bought all my pagers, had done tons and tons of research on them and honestly for what I use them for, (monitoring a very busy simulcast system here in IL) it's better than anything else I tested it against and to that end, much better.

Would some of the things mentioned be nice? Sure they would I'll not deny that, but I don't think we're going to see many production changes to satisfy want we want in the scanning world vs what true first responders need and use daily in their line of business. I at least am not holding my breath :)
 

K9KLC

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Mar 31, 2007
Messages
2,405
Reaction score
2,524
Location
Southwest, IL
I also have never experienced the interference you mention but I"m not close to a broadcast tower either. I will pair up a set of buds to it later and see if I see the high/med/low thing you mention, that's interesting to say the least. I rarely use any type of ear bud on mine but on the few occasions I've done that at least for testing, I've not noticed it.
 

CollinsURG

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jul 19, 2025
Messages
447
Reaction score
433
Location
North Carolina
It's important to remember, that the Unication pagers were built and designed for "first responders" needing a reliable pager with the features they needed. I've talked to probably 20 or so people that carry these day in and day out and even done some programming for then on occasion and none to date have expressed any "faults" in the pager for what they use it for.

I recently sold a G4 and amplified charger to a younger fellow on a volunteer department in NC actually and he's elated with how it works. He's found absolutely no faults with it and carry's it daily.

It seems to me that at least mostly, all of the shortcomings of the pager are from people that are trying to use it as a scanning device and not its intended design purpose. (at least from what I've read here on rr). I knew exactly what I was getting when I bought all my pagers, had done tons and tons of research on them and honestly for what I use them for, (monitoring a very busy simulcast system here in IL) it's better than anything else I tested it against and to that end, much better.

Would some of the things mentioned be nice? Sure they would I'll not deny that, but I don't think we're going to see many production changes to satisfy want we want in the scanning world vs what true first responders need and use daily in their line of business. I at least am not holding my breath :)
I am not disappointed in it as a monitor at all. In fact it fits right into how I monitor. I am usually focused on one dispatch channel, although it does monitor up to 64 TGIDs which is more than I have programmed for any system. I cannot understand how many people can scan and listen to multiple agencies and dozens of channels at one time. You miss a lot! I monitor 2 agency's dispatch. Highway Patrol and county SO. If there is an incident I am interested in, I follow it to other channels or other systems.

Now if they would enable the "Channel Setings" that would be very nice. I asked Ray Zimmerman about that one. He thought it may have been there for an export model. Also, if while in the "Receiving table info" you could see the site it is monitoring at the top of the list instead of having to scroll all the way to the bottom, and scroll to a TGID in that list and "Stay" on it would be nice. Regardless of this wish list, I am considering getting another version later. I really like the solid performance.

I would not necessarily recommend it to someone that expects a scanner. But for someone that monitors as I do, I recommend it over a scanner.
 
Last edited:

CollinsURG

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jul 19, 2025
Messages
447
Reaction score
433
Location
North Carolina
I also have never experienced the interference you mention but I"m not close to a broadcast tower either. I will pair up a set of buds to it later and see if I see the high/med/low thing you mention, that's interesting to say the least. I rarely use any type of ear bud on mine but on the few occasions I've done that at least for testing, I've not noticed it.
I did not notice the high/med/low until I started scrutinizing BT earbuds. It is sort of subtle, but there. I looked for something I may have changed. Did not find anything. I reset the pager to factory, downloaded a new profile and programmed in just one NOAA frequency for testing. Still just high/med/low.

The interference only happens with that F10 earbud. I may try the Unication earbud just to see what Unication considers good or how it compares to others.
 

K9KLC

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Mar 31, 2007
Messages
2,405
Reaction score
2,524
Location
Southwest, IL
I may try the Unication earbud just to see what Unication considers good or how it compares to others.
This would be interesting. I know I use Motorola HT's with Bluetooth, and I finally got tired of messing with this, that and the other plus I wanted the PTT on the head piece so I didn't have to grab the radio. I finally upped the money for the Motorola one and never looked back. Although it has a small mic boom on it, I may try and pair it to the G5 and see what happens.
 

K9KLC

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Mar 31, 2007
Messages
2,405
Reaction score
2,524
Location
Southwest, IL
I would not necessarily recommend it to someone that expects a scanner. But for someone that monitors as I do, I recommend it over a scanner.
No you have to know exactly what you're getting and what it does. The 150 wasn't out yet and even today I don't know anyone locally that has one but I can tell you, the SDS 100 faired pretty poorly against the G5 when I had it for several weeks doing my testing. Plus the ease of carrying the G5 over larger hand held's is awesome.
I cannot understand how many people can scan and listen to multiple agencies and dozens of channels at one time. You miss a lot!
Even monitoring one system, and about 20 different "active" things I know I miss stuff. 95% of our stuff here is on the county Simulcast so one system isn't the problem, it's all that's on that system. I do occasionally find myself locking things out and or firing up the 2nd G5 and locking it on something while the other one scans. Honestly prior to selling the G4 there were nights I had it on also during some higher profile pursuits just to try and catch everything. Not long ago we had a police officer get shot, and I had all three on plus was listening to some analog stuff on my outside radio on one of my ham radios on VHF and UHF for the stuff coming out there. Never enough radios LOL.
 

CollinsURG

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jul 19, 2025
Messages
447
Reaction score
433
Location
North Carolina
This would be interesting. I know I use Motorola HT's with Bluetooth, and I finally got tired of messing with this, that and the other plus I wanted the PTT on the head piece so I didn't have to grab the radio. I finally upped the money for the Motorola one and never looked back. Although it has a small mic boom on it, I may try and pair it to the G5 and see what happens.
The Unication BT is not very expensive. I only objected to the size. I will order one soon from Ray. His shipping price is very reasonable. Unication is charging tariff fees. Ridiculous.
 

CollinsURG

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jul 19, 2025
Messages
447
Reaction score
433
Location
North Carolina
No you have to know exactly what you're getting and what it does. The 150 wasn't out yet and even today I don't know anyone locally that has one but I can tell you, the SDS 100 faired pretty poorly against the G5 when I had it for several weeks doing my testing. Plus the ease of carrying the G5 over larger hand held's is awesome.

Even monitoring one system, and about 20 different "active" things I know I miss stuff. 95% of our stuff here is on the county Simulcast so one system isn't the problem, it's all that's on that system. I do occasionally find myself locking things out and or firing up the 2nd G5 and locking it on something while the other one scans. Honestly prior to selling the G4 there were nights I had it on also during some higher profile pursuits just to try and catch everything. Not long ago we had a police officer get shot, and I had all three on plus was listening to some analog stuff on my outside radio on one of my ham radios on VHF and UHF for the stuff coming out there. Never enough radios LOL.
I definately like the size of the G5. I can easily operate it one handed. I also don't feel like it will fall apart if I dropped it on concrete. The reception clarity is what I would expect from a Motorola HT. The SDS100 only gets used for Simulcast. Now that I have G5, it only gets turned when there is an incident I want to follow involving multiple agencies. For analog and non LSM, the BCD325P2 gets used. It has far better audio than the SDS100 and beats it on anything not LSM.
 

wwhitby

Member
Feed Provider
Joined
Jan 10, 2003
Messages
1,318
Reaction score
258
Location
Autauga County, Alabama
So the same exact behavior?
Yes.

With the speaker mic on max volume, I had noticed that the same radio on the same talkgroup was significantly lower or higher in volume and I had only moved the volume knob 5 or 10 down or up. I couldn't figure out why.
 

CollinsURG

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jul 19, 2025
Messages
447
Reaction score
433
Location
North Carolina
Unication Bluetooth ordered from Ray's pagers. I will report back it's behavior when I receive it.
 

wwhitby

Member
Feed Provider
Joined
Jan 10, 2003
Messages
1,318
Reaction score
258
Location
Autauga County, Alabama
I also don't feel like it will fall apart if I dropped it on concrete.

Mine didn't break :) . I'm using a hard leather case with a swivel and I didn't get the swivel positioned right. It dropped from waist high on to the asphalt, and survived just fine.

The reception clarity is what I would expect from a Motorola HT. The SDS100 only gets used for Simulcast. Now that I have G5, it only gets turned when there is an incident I want to follow involving multiple agencies. For analog and non LSM, the BCD325P2 gets used. It has far better audio than the SDS100 and beats it on anything not LSM.
I use mine in the car and when listening to simulcast sites. I have a tower about a mile away from me that isn't simulcast, so I use my TRX-1 for listening at home. I use Unitrunker for finding new talkgroups.
 

CollinsURG

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jul 19, 2025
Messages
447
Reaction score
433
Location
North Carolina
Yes.

With the speaker mic on max volume, I had noticed that the same radio on the same talkgroup was significantly lower or higher in volume and I had only moved the volume knob 5 or 10 down or up. I couldn't figure out why.
What I observed was 0-30 is low, 35-60 is medium, 65-100 is high volume.
 

CollinsURG

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jul 19, 2025
Messages
447
Reaction score
433
Location
North Carolina
The Focuspower F10 sounds very good. It is quite small, which I assume limits it's battery size and therefore BT power output. I have noticed it drops out of connection with the G5 at distances way shorter than other larger earbuds. This is not an issue as I only expected to be near the G5 using it. It may be part of why the interference can overcome it. I have noticed there is a particular area within the house that gets interference from the AM broadcast station, even though the G5 is about 3 feet away. I can work around it by moving the G5 closer.
 

ed3750

Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2005
Messages
64
Reaction score
28
Location
Palm Beach County, FL
Bone induction? They don't block the ear canal? How much and where?

I have been trying to find a good pair of bone conduction earbuds that don't block my ear for a bit. My wife wears full headphones - she likes to tune out the world. Most I wear is earbuds - I can't tune out the world and maintain my sanity, I need to know what's going on around me.

Bone conduction is my ideal, and would be just like the old tac radios I used to use in the Air Force. (A throat mic rounds out the set, keeps it out of the way.)
I found Aftershokz to be the best. List price is around $150, but occasionally on sale at Amazon for $70 to 80. Not inexpensive, but have been using them for several years w/o any problems.
 

picscan

Member
Joined
Nov 5, 2013
Messages
344
Reaction score
89
Location
CA
The only earbuds I have found to work for me on my G5s with good volume are the LG HBS 750, they are wired bluetooth buds that go around my neck.
 

CollinsURG

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jul 19, 2025
Messages
447
Reaction score
433
Location
North Carolina
The only earbuds I have found to work for me on my G5s with good volume are the LG HBS 750, they are wired bluetooth buds that go around my neck.
I have an older pair of Otium Sport that are wired and go around my neck. They sound great with plenty of volume. I have been looking for a single earbud. I bought a newer pair of Optium that look the same, but they are not nearly as loud. I wanted a spare. Had to send them back. They were about half as loud as the older pair.
 

CollinsURG

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jul 19, 2025
Messages
447
Reaction score
433
Location
North Carolina
The G5 Bluetooth doesn't make any sense. I received the Unication BT headset. Max volume on the G5 it is very weak. It has volume up and down buttons which do control volume. With the G5 volume at 100 and the headset volume on max, it is about as loud as the low volume setting using the FOCUSPOWER F10, my old Otium Sport headset and a pair of TOCO NC9 earbuds.

I paired the Unication headset with my phone. The headset does not support media, only phone. It is loud enough on a phone call at max volume, but it can't be turned up as loud as my other earbuds.

I called Ray Zimmerman since I bought the headset from him. I am waiting to hear back from him about a possible replacement, but the way the headset is behaving doesn't make sense. He said he had not heard such a problem with them before.

The Unication headset volume control with the pager works the same as any other Bluetooth. Volume set at 0 to 30 is low, 35 to 60 is medium and 65 too 100 is high. There is no volume off with any BT. 0 is low, the same as 30.

Ray said the G5+ works exactly the same as the G5. So far, the only operational difference was USB C. I am wondering if they upgraded the Bluetooth. For some reason I did not think to ask him that. Maybe when I speak to him next time about the headset.
 
Top