Boardman police on Marcs

nabryan07

Newbie
Joined
Mar 13, 2016
Messages
4
Saw in the local newspaper sometime last week that Boardman PD is moving to marcs. Currently all police ops are encrypted. My question is are they likely to keep encryption on when they change systems or be able to be scammed? Anyone with insight?
 

wa8pyr

Retired and playing radio whenever I want.
Staff member
Lead Database Admin
Joined
Sep 22, 2002
Messages
7,337
Location
Ohio
Saw in the local newspaper sometime last week that Boardman PD is moving to marcs. Currently all police ops are encrypted. My question is are they likely to keep encryption on when they change systems or be able to be scammed? Anyone with insight?
If they’re encrypted now, they’ll almost certainly keep it that way.

Being a co-owner of their current system, why would Boardman be moving to MARCS?
 

ibagli

Member
Joined
Dec 2, 2006
Messages
984
Location
Ohio
Being a co-owner of their current system, why would Boardman be moving to MARCS?
It sounds like it's the whole system, via one of the partnership tiers.


Last month, the Austintown-Boardman-Mahoning County Council of Governments unanimously approved a switch to the Multi-Agency Radio Communication System, known as MARCS.
[...]
The state will take over the maintenance costs of all towers and software through Motorola once the transition is complete. Austintown and Boardman still will be responsible for the costs of their dispatch consoles, at approximately $120,000 each, but the Mahoning County commissioners have agreed to offset that cost.
 

Nasby

Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2004
Messages
2,728
Location
Ohio
This is very similar to what the City of Warren did a few years ago. They joined Marcs and surrendered their radio sites to them.
As far as encryption, it’s almost a guarantee that all Mahoning County law enforcement agencies (with YSU PD possibly being the exception) that migrate to Marcs will continue to use full time encryption.
 

wd8chl

Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2007
Messages
475
Based on that, it does sound like it will end up like Lake, Geauga, and Summit co's. as far as being shared onto MARCS...
 

wa8pyr

Retired and playing radio whenever I want.
Staff member
Lead Database Admin
Joined
Sep 22, 2002
Messages
7,337
Location
Ohio
It sounds like it's the whole system, via one of the partnership tiers.

Another one bites the dust. The 800lb gorilla must be happy….
 

kf8yk

Member
Joined
May 3, 2003
Messages
806
Looks like Mahoning County will have 2 MARCS systems and 7 towers for a small county.
What's your reasoning for that?

My prediction is the Austintown/Boardman & Mahoning Co MARCS sites get merged into one new MARCS simulcast site:

MARCS Salem site will go away as it's co-located with a Austintown/Boardman simulcast sub-site on the WNEO TV tower. No need for both.

MARCS Lincoln Park is less than 3 miles from the Austintown/Boardman YSU sub-site, maybe they would keep both but with this short site spacing there's not a lot of benefit. I expect one or the other to remain as a simulcast sub-site but not both.
 

jrl44430

Member
Joined
Nov 2, 2002
Messages
240
Why is the current Austintown system not listed as simulcast? There are 3 towers about the same distant from me all using the same frequencies.
 

jrl44430

Member
Joined
Nov 2, 2002
Messages
240
This was my reasoning.

The state will take over the maintenance costs of all towers and software through Motorola once the transition is complete.
 

wa8pyr

Retired and playing radio whenever I want.
Staff member
Lead Database Admin
Joined
Sep 22, 2002
Messages
7,337
Location
Ohio
Looks like Mahoning County will have 2 MARCS systems and 7 towers for a small county.
I wouldn't be surprised if MARCS keeps one of their existing towers; they've done this in other counties as well, generally keeping stuff like the state prisons on the state site.
 
Top