Hello
@niceguy71. Just an FYI. I take it that the roll of RG-8/U was new. Does it have crimp-type PL-259 connectors? Are the connectors sealed on the coax side with heat shrink tubing? Is there a manufacturer’s name on the cable? If so, who is the cable made by? Using a volt-ohm meter (VOM) will check for center conductor and shield continuity end-to-end as well as for shorts but cannot tell you if the cable is good at RF levels. For example, if the cable is contaminated with water, the VOM probably will not pick up on that. You would need something a little more sophisticated like a NanoVNA (at a minimum) to check some other parameters in the 25 MHz to 30 MHz RF range to know if the cable is good at RF levels.
RG-8/U is “OK” to use for CB on a 100 foot run. Be sure to seal the connection at the antenna end to prevent water contamination of the cable. You will not be able to direct bury the cable in the ground as it is not rated for that. For a direct bury installation, you would need at least RG-213/U which costs about 75 cents more per foot than RG-8/U. In addition to RG-213/U’s direct bury characteristic, it will also last longer than RG-8/U in sunlight. It’s all in what your design requirements are for your antenna system.
Finally, I should mention to be sure the you follow good grounding principles on your antenna system. You don’t want to become the neighborhood “magnet” for lightning strikes. I had a thread on that a while back. It is found by clicking this heading:
In many threads about running coax to antennas, some of us will usually mention "be sure to properly ground things" without going into a whole lot of details. We may even mention that the National Electrical Code (NEC) requires it for all homes and businesses within the United States. I found...
forums.radioreference.com
Best wishes for an optimal and safe antenna installation.
Dave K4EET
P.S.: That was pretty awesome that you apparently found what I would call an old-skool CB repair shop. You don’t hear about too many of them.