Al42 said:Does it have to be a multicoupler? Would a splitter do?
"Splitter" usually refers to the resistive network one buys at Radio Shack for a few bucks. "Multicoupler" could be something that works much better, but costs a lot more.N_Jay said:Al42 said:Does it have to be a multicoupler? Would a splitter do?
And the difference would be?
bsavery said:Crazyboy.... stick with the multicoupler search. Or bite the bullet and buy a new one. Even the best CATV splitter has 7.5db of loss per port.
Toss in the loss from the impedence mis-match and that's enough to kill off just about anything not transmitting from your driveway!
Bob
Which is why I asked. The RS 15-1235 (4 port, which is what crazyboy wants) is only $10. If it works he saved some money - if it doesn't he can return it.DaveH said:Agreed, the high-grade multicouplers may be worth the money for those who need them. The cheap approach may work fine and save a pile of money, and it is a small investment.
bsavery said:Crazyboy.... stick with the multicoupler search. Or bite the bullet and buy a new one. Even the best CATV splitter has 7.5db of loss per port.
Toss in the loss from the impedence mis-match and that's enough to kill off just about anything not transmitting from your driveway!
Bob
crazyboy said:Hi. I was wondering where I can get a cheap multicoupler. I need four ports.(sc200,bc 142xl,pro97) I need it to be under 100 dollars. Anyone know where I can get one used maybe? thanks.
DaveH said:bsavery said:Crazyboy.... stick with the multicoupler search. Or bite the bullet and buy a new one. Even the best CATV splitter has 7.5db of loss per port.
Toss in the loss from the impedence mis-match and that's enough to kill off just about anything not transmitting from your driveway!
Bob
A 2-port splitter has 3.5-4dB loss per port. As I have stated, 3dB of this is due to splitting power 2 ways. A perfect 4-port splitter would have 6dB loss per port; a real one higher.
The impedence mismatch thing is part of a long-standing misconception. There will be an additional small loss due to mismatch, which I admit I didn't mention, but it is not going to outright kill any reasonable signal. It is the same flawed argument such as against using 75-ohm coax.
Agreed, the high-grade multicouplers may be worth the money for those who need them. The cheap approach may work fine and save a pile of money, and it is a small investment.
N_Jay said:NO they don't.
I decent qualliy 2 way is 3.5 or so.
The loss from the mismatcc would only be a concern if teh antenna system is a consistant 50 ohm, which a wide band antenn is NOT!.
bsavery said:I think I'd have to go with both of you on this one. The receiver may be closer to 50 ohms across its entire design range (the design engineer has a bit of control over that, and the front end can easily be kept tuned) but the antenna impedance "curve" will probably resemble a fractal image.N_Jay said:The loss from the mismatcc would only be a concern if teh antenna system is a consistant 50 ohm, which a wide band antenn is NOT!.
It's not constant, agreed... but how much does it really vary? I'll bet from 100-900 mhz it'll be closer to 50 than 75.
bsavery said:N_Jay said:NO they don't.
I decent qualliy 2 way is 3.5 or so.
Which I would have said if he'd asked about a 2 way splitter. He asked about a 4 way, so I stated the loss for a 4 way splitter.
bsavery said:N_Jay said:The loss from the mismatcc would only be a concern if teh antenna system is a consistant 50 ohm, which a wide band antenn is NOT!.
It's not constant, agreed... but how much does it really vary? I'll bet from 100-900 mhz it'll be closer to 50 than 75.
Bob