TRX-1: Corruption when editing frequencies on EZ Scan conventional tab

Status
Not open for further replies.

dem1

Member
Joined
Jun 28, 2018
Messages
51
Following a few instances over the past two years where changes I made on the conventional frequencies tab in EZ Scan produced erroneous results, I did some testing this week to better understand what was happening.

Bottom Line: If a frequency change was made to an existing object on EZ Scan's conventional tab, the change looked OK on the screen but was applied to the wrong object if the list was not sorted by the "Rec#" field.

For test purposes, I created a list of 10 conventional frequencies from 400-409 MHz in 1 MHz steps and imported it into a fresh configuration (V-Scanner Folder) from EZ Scan's "Conventional Frequencies" tab. Each frequency was randomly assigned an Alpha Tag letter (A-H). To keep things simple, the import contained no other fields aside from Frequency and Alpha Tag.

Following import, I sorted the list by Alpha Tag on the Conventional Frequencies tab, and then changed one of the frequencies by clicking on it and entering a new frequency. All looked fine, but after re-sorting the list by Rec# I discovered that the frequency of a different object had been changed, rather than the one I had clicked on.

The only exception was when I changed the frequency of Rec# 00005, which by chance remained in the same position within the list regardless of whether it was sorted by Rec# or Alpha Tag. But after changing the frequency of this object I re-sorted the list by frequency, causing the object's position to move. A second frequency change was then made, and it got applied to the wrong object.

In many but not all cases, EZ Scan mis-applied the frequency change to the record which had been immediately below the one I edited. Fields other than Frequency could be edited properly, regardless of sort order.

My test data file is attached to this message in case anyone wishes to try it, but be sure to us a fresh V-Scanner folder so as not to corrupt your active one. I'd be curious if your results are the same or if it happens with EZ Scan versions for other Whistler scanners as well. I couldn't find any past forum discussions.
 

Attachments

  • EZ_Scan_test_import_conventional.txt
    177 bytes · Views: 10

Ubbe

Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2006
Messages
9,734
Location
Stockholm, Sweden
You have to "refresh" a list if you sort it or do a major change to it, by going to another folder in EZ-Scan and then back again. It doesn't seem to automaticly keep track of changes to be displayed if you keep yourself stationary on the list. I usually switch between trunked system, scan list and conventional view to make sure that changes are updated and refreshed before doing a second edit.

I have learned that removing the SD card from the scanner and always edit in in the computer and "refresh" each edit by switching to another view have kept errors at a minimum. Actually, haven't had a single problem since doing that.

/Ubbe
 

dem1

Member
Joined
Jun 28, 2018
Messages
51
Thanks Ubbe, that is a good point. I went back and added a refresh step to my experiment and the results were even more bizarre, as shown in the attached screenshot sequence.

Starting with the original import, I changed the frequency of Rec# 00002 to 42 MHz while the list was sorted by Alpha Tag. Then I re-sorted the list by Rec# and back to Alpha Tag. This made it appear as if the frequency of Rec# 00003 had been changed instead of 00002. But after a full refresh, I found that the frequency of Rec# 00006 had actually been changed, and that its Alpha Tag had oddly been changed to match that of Rec# 00003.

So the take-away is to never ever edit a frequency on the conventional tab unless the list is sorted by Rec#, or you will regret it!

To be safe, I make frequent back-up copies of my V-Scanner folders and keep my lists in an Excel file as well in case I ever need to start anew. And to refresh EZ Scan, the most sure-fire way I've found is to simply re-open the V-Scanner folder from the File menu. On the Scanlists tab, switching to another scanlist and back would update the scanlist view, but not the Conventional Frequencies tab listing.

ConventionalTabScreenshots.jpg
 

gmclam

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Sep 15, 2006
Messages
6,418
Location
Fair Oaks, CA
I don't trust EZ Scan for the editing it does allow. To be par with modern scanner programming software it should allow the user to organize channels, frequencies and talkgroups as desired; but it doesn't. As a result of all this I do ALL of my editing and organizing in Excel then import into EZ Scan. For conventional channels it is somewhat painless. For trunked systems, that's another matter.
 

jdolina

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jul 4, 2006
Messages
497
Location
Lorain Ohio
I thought I was losing my mind editing frequencies for the trx2. Then I remembered seeing something abut corruption. I had sorted my conventional list and edited and ran into the same results. I had to resort by rec and go back and fix a whole bunch of entries. Seems to be an issue with the new ez-scan
 

Ubbe

Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2006
Messages
9,734
Location
Stockholm, Sweden
I did some tests and got the exact same result as dem1. I changes a few frequencies and after refreshing and exit EZ-Scam I started it again and some frequencies where changed on records I didn't touch and alpha tags where changed as well. It was a total mess if an edit where made when not sorted on rec#. I haven't seen these kind of major problems before, so probably only related to latest EZ-Scam. It seems like the same pointers in memory where reused by different records when sorted in a non-default way, when they all should have their own unique ones stayed locked to each rec#.

/Ubbe
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top