rapidcharger
Member
I'd much prefer to use IRLP. With Echolink, people can sit in front of their computer, & speak to others in front of a computer. Just use skype for that. Since our hobby is ham radio, where was the radio in that scenario? Of course radios can be used too, but with IRLP, both ends of the chat must be using a 2-way radio. With new DMR systems, the internet links the world, but people must still talk into a radio. So for me, if I want to talk to the world, it's HF, DMR, IRLP, or nothing.
That's true but then again there are some serious barriers to entry with IRLP and DMR that exclude a lot of people who start out with the desktop client or mobile app and will go on to using RF.Even though I own and maintain a mixed mode (analog and digital) echolink node that has wide area coverage, I occasionally do need to log in via mobile device and that is very useful. Not to mention it would have cost a lot more to set up an IRLP node and I did consider that.
And DMR,. well, that pretty much excludes anyone who doesn't have a DMR repeater they can hit as there are not any widely available gateways for DMR that I am aware of.
I don't have any gripes with using the desktop client or mobile apps occasionally, but when the majority of the regular users are using those, it begs the question, why do I bother to maintain the RF infrastructure when we can all just chat on some app and at least we'd be able to chat with people who aren't even hams. Heck, we can all use snapchat and at least have the option to send each other videos of our private parts like the kids are doing nowadays.
That said, I'll take the mobile app users over no users at all and this is of course a minor gripe. You can very easily set up the software to only accept connections from repeaters and links. I know the people who are logging on just aren't interested in setting up a node and they don't have any repeaters near them with echolink on it. So it's a take it or leave it scenario.