The remarks aimed at said individual here are merely the result of his long standing habit of posting whether or not he has anything of any value to add to the topic at hand. In other words, just for the sake of posting and becoming involved in the discussion. The individuals who posted these remarks are only a sampling of the number of people, I included, who are just plain sick and tired of having to sift through much of his useless drivel and unverified or incomplete information in order to find anything of value pertaining to a specific topic. As a Global Moderator on the Scan-NJ site, I have received numerous Private Messages from members there complaining of his habits and posting practices.
As I said before, the two individuals who posted here are just a small sampling. Some people can accept constructive criticism and use it as a learning tool, others just don't get the picture unless they are "whacked in the backside", and still others never get it.
Granted, the information he posted on this particular thread may have been somewhat accurate, and I say somewhat, because as has been stated many times before, one will not hear anything "juicy" and any of the FBI frequencies, and I think I am accurate in assuming that that's what the author of the original question was probably looking for.
This topic was brought up on the New York thread previous to this, and he posted the same information there and was told then that you will not hear any of the "juicy" stuff on any of those frequencies. Rather than to accept that information and pass it on here, he chose to simply post the same frequencies again, without passing on the additional information he received on the New York thread. Another example of not doing his homework, or as they say in high school, turning in an incomplete assignment.
We all want to hear the "good stuff", but unfortunately, so do the "bad guys" and for that reason they either encrypt or use Nextels, or some other means of secure communications. If said individual had posted this in his reply, rather than to mislead the original author into thinking he will hear the "juicy stuff", by not saying anything, I think I am safe to say that none of this would have happened.
