I guess this illustrates how naïve I am about how this stuff works. I’d like to take this opportunity to learn something. I went ballistic when I found out that Oklahoma City selected an EDACS radio system despite the established Smartnet statewide system. The technical issues of integrating those systems, I understand, are in process. This incident, on the other hand, makes me wonder about the non-technical issues arising from mutual aid in an environment when true communications interoperability exists.
I have listened to countless pursuits, searches, and large fires that involved multiple agencies and was amazed that the chaos and confusion that inevitably accompanies these events is exacerbated by agencies trying to coordinate with other agencies through their dispatchers who use the phone to contact other dispatchers. This occurs even when I know that the responding units have the capability to directly communicate with the other agency resulting in delayed responses (holes in a perimeter, for example) and added confusion. I wonder if when OKC becomes communications interoperable, there is some sort of insurmountable barrier that will prevent metro agencies from working out mutual aid agreements that will allow public safety officials from different jurisdictions to rapidly and temporarily integrate their operations in the interest of most effectively protecting life and property instead of each agency playing its own sub game.
Using what was posted about this incident as an example, I would have thought that when OHP called TPD for assistance, all TPD units responding including a TPD supervisor would switch their radios to whatever talkgroup that OHP was already using for the search and then start that way. While enroute by listening to the search, they would get a feel for what is going on and would be up to speed and ready to help once they arrived on the scene. I can understand switching to a RMA talkgroup if an incident becomes protracted so that the primary channels can be kept clear. In the initial portion of an emergency mutual aid incident, however, I’d have thought that it would be second nature to switch to the lead agency’s talkgroup, integrate, and get the bad guy. It is apparent that I must not have a very secure grip on reality.