• To anyone looking to acquire commercial radio programming software:

    Please do not make requests for copies of radio programming software which is sold (or was sold) by the manufacturer for any monetary value. All requests will be deleted and a forum infraction issued. Making a request such as this is attempting to engage in software piracy and this forum cannot be involved or associated with this activity. The same goes for any private transaction via Private Message. Even if you attempt to engage in this activity in PM's we will still enforce the forum rules. Your PM's are not private and the administration has the right to read them if there's a hint to criminal activity.

    If you are having trouble legally obtaining software please state so. We do not want any hurt feelings when your vague post is mistaken for a free request. It is YOUR responsibility to properly word your request.

    To obtain Motorola software see the Sticky in the Motorola forum.

    The various other vendors often permit their dealers to sell the software online (i.e., Kenwood). Please use Google or some other search engine to find a dealer that sells the software. Typically each series or individual radio requires its own software package. Often the Kenwood software is less than $100 so don't be a cheapskate; just purchase it.

    For M/A Com/Harris/GE, etc: there are two software packages that program all current and past radios. One package is for conventional programming and the other for trunked programming. The trunked package is in upwards of $2,500. The conventional package is more reasonable though is still several hundred dollars. The benefit is you do not need multiple versions for each radio (unlike Motorola).

    This is a large and very visible forum. We cannot jeopardize the ability to provide the RadioReference services by allowing this activity to occur. Please respect this.

FirstNet Article from Cincinnati

Status
Not open for further replies.

belvdr

Active Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Aug 2, 2013
Messages
2,581
Reaction score
1,664
Saw the following article posted from a Cincinnati:
However, the following quote confused me:
How does First Net work? It's an app on first responders phones' that turns off their regular service cuing the prioritized cell service to activate.

"It actually has its own radio spectrum frequency that allows us to operate independently from the public," Knapp explained.
FirstNet Assist is a standard app for iOS or Android, so no unique phones are required. I assumed FirstNet required specific radios to utilize the service. I'm guessing the article is just not really clear on the difference between the app and FirstNet.

Thoughts from someone who knows how this works?
 

mmckenna

I ♥ Ø
Joined
Jul 27, 2005
Messages
28,523
Reaction score
36,530
Location
United States
Saw the following article posted from a Cincinnati:

News media does such a poor job with this stuff.

However, the following quote confused me:FirstNet Assist is a standard app for iOS or Android, so no unique phones are required. I assumed FirstNet required specific radios to utilize the service.

In general terms, not doing a deep dive here:
The phone needs to be on the FirstNet network.
Not really 'special radios'. FirstNet can use Band 14 (700MHz), and just about any cell phone made in the last couple of years will support that.
Most AT&T consumer customers can access Band 14, that's part of the deal. AT&T can use it for what they want, as long as public safety can utilize it where needed.
But, keep in mind that FirstNet does not just run on Band 14, it uses the entire AT&T network.

I'm guessing the article is just not really clear on the difference between the app and FirstNet.

The app just gives some access to their FirstNet account. I can do the same thing via their web portal. It allows agencies/users to request getting bumped up priority. FirstNet has several levels of priority and that is assigned based on the user. The new article made it sound like it was the app that made FirstNet work, or somehow magically made a non FirstNet phone work.
 

belvdr

Active Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Aug 2, 2013
Messages
2,581
Reaction score
1,664
News media does such a poor job with this stuff.
Thanks for the response. This all makes sense. To be fair, the fire official was quoted saying they had an independent frequency.
In general terms, not doing a deep dive here:
The phone needs to be on the FirstNet network.
Not really 'special radios'. FirstNet can use Band 14 (700MHz), and just about any cell phone made in the last couple of years will support that.
Most AT&T consumer customers can access Band 14, that's part of the deal. AT&T can use it for what they want, as long as public safety can utilize it where needed.
But, keep in mind that FirstNet does not just run on Band 14, it uses the entire AT&T network.

The app just gives some access to their FirstNet account. I can do the same thing via their web portal. It allows agencies/users to request getting bumped up priority. FirstNet has several levels of priority and that is assigned based on the user. The new article made it sound like it was the app that made FirstNet work, or somehow magically made a non FirstNet phone work.
So, FirstNet isn't about a typical two-way radio that can operate across AT&T's network. It's always a WWAN device (phone, tablet, laptop, etc)? I'm guessing it prioritizes by IMEI, correct?
 

littona

Super Freq
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Nov 12, 2006
Messages
407
Reaction score
334
Location
Council Bluffs, IA
Thanks for the response. This all makes sense. To be fair, the fire official was quoted saying they had an independent frequency.
So, FirstNet isn't about a typical two-way radio that can operate across AT&T's network. It's always a WWAN device (phone, tablet, laptop, etc)? I'm guessing it prioritizes by IMEI, correct?
That's where things get confusing. There's still a radio component to FirstNet in some areas. A good example is the State of Iowa's ISICS system. It's a statewide radio system that was built mostly by AT&T. Subscribers can use traditional radios or FirstNet phones. There are advantages and disadvantages to both. In my opinion, phones are better suited to the occasional user.
 

mmckenna

I ♥ Ø
Joined
Jul 27, 2005
Messages
28,523
Reaction score
36,530
Location
United States
Thanks for the response. This all makes sense. To be fair, the fire official was quoted saying they had an independent frequency.
So, FirstNet isn't about a typical two-way radio that can operate across AT&T's network. It's always a WWAN device (phone, tablet, laptop, etc)? I'm guessing it prioritizes by IMEI, correct?

FirstNet is a cellular service that runs on top of the AT&T wireless network. I do believe it uses the IMEI to assign priority. I have it on my phone and it is tied to that phone. It shows "FIrstNet" up on the top of my screen where my wife's phone shows "AT&T".
The priority thing gives users a priority level on the network. My FirstNet phone would have priority over my wife's AT&T phone. Our officer's FirstNet phones would have priority over my FirstNet phone.

FirstNet received 700MHz spectrum, AT&T added that to some of their sites. But FirstNet can run on any of AT&T's spectrum/sites. FirstNet is essentially a Mobile Virtual Network Operator that runs on top of the AT&T network. FirstNet has their own LTE cores, but those are tied into the AT&T LTE cores (and before anyone asks, FirstNet absolutely works on 5G….)

Some two way radios, like the Motorola APX-8000 and the Harris XL-200 line have the ability to install a SIM card in them. That will let them connect to the cellular network (Verizon or AT&T/FN) and use data. That data can be used to haul voice back to a gateway at the P25 core for their radio system. We played with this for a while and are considering adding it. Our officers could take the radios anywhere they had FirstNet/AT&T coverage and talk even though they were WAY outside our coverage area.
 

belvdr

Active Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Aug 2, 2013
Messages
2,581
Reaction score
1,664
FirstNet is a cellular service that runs on top of the AT&T wireless network. I do believe it uses the IMEI to assign priority. I have it on my phone and it is tied to that phone. It shows "FIrstNet" up on the top of my screen where my wife's phone shows "AT&T".
The priority thing gives users a priority level on the network. My FirstNet phone would have priority over my wife's AT&T phone. Our officer's FirstNet phones would have priority over my FirstNet phone.

FirstNet received 700MHz spectrum, AT&T added that to some of their sites. But FirstNet can run on any of AT&T's spectrum/sites. FirstNet is essentially a Mobile Virtual Network Operator that runs on top of the AT&T network. FirstNet has their own LTE cores, but those are tied into the AT&T LTE cores (and before anyone asks, FirstNet absolutely works on 5G….)

Some two way radios, like the Motorola APX-8000 and the Harris XL-200 line have the ability to install a SIM card in them. That will let them connect to the cellular network (Verizon or AT&T/FN) and use data. That data can be used to haul voice back to a gateway at the P25 core for their radio system. We played with this for a while and are considering adding it. Our officers could take the radios anywhere they had FirstNet/AT&T coverage and talk even though they were WAY outside our coverage area.
That all makes sense, thanks. The article was simply confusing, at best.
 

GTR8000

NY/NJ Database Guy
Database Admin
Joined
Oct 4, 2007
Messages
17,062
Reaction score
16,538
Location
BEE00
Some two way radios, like the Motorola APX-8000 and the Harris XL-200 line have the ability to install a SIM card in them.
Minor clarification, the APX 8000 is not LTE capable; you're confusing it with the APX NEXT series. The traditional APX models that are capable of WiFi (6x00BN, 8x00) access SmartConnect using that method.
 

mmckenna

I ♥ Ø
Joined
Jul 27, 2005
Messages
28,523
Reaction score
36,530
Location
United States
Minor clarification, the APX 8000 is not LTE capable; you're confusing it with the APX NEXT series. The traditional APX models that are capable of WiFi (6x00BN, 8x00) access SmartConnect using that method.

Thanks, I should have remembered that, just went through that entire thing with comparing APX-8000, APX-Next and Harris.
 

mrsvensven

Member
Joined
Jul 27, 2006
Messages
190
Reaction score
137
A decade or more ago when FirstNet was first conceived, it had not been invented yet. All anyone knew is that is was going to be a "public safety broadband network". It was commonly thought that FirstNet was going to be some kind of radio system and a likely replacement for LMR as we knew it. Over time as the contract was awarded to AT&T and FirstNet was actually built, it turned out to just be another cell phone company. On the back end, there are certain priority and preemption features built into the network, but to most end users, a FirstNet cell phone doesn't operate any differently than a cell phone on the Verizon, AT&T, or any other network.

Unfortunately, there is still a bit of confusion. Firstnet never really completely shook the image of being some kind of radio system or a replacement for LMR. There are still a lot of people out there that don't realize it's just another cell phone company.

(I'm aware that I oversimplified things. I just don't think getting into all the little details is relevant to the current thread.)
 

Trbogeek

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Nov 2, 2017
Messages
235
Reaction score
188
Location
Batavia, NY
News media does such a poor job with this stuff.



In general terms, not doing a deep dive here:
The phone needs to be on the FirstNet network.
Not really 'special radios'. FirstNet can use Band 14 (700MHz), and just about any cell phone made in the last couple of years will support that.
Most AT&T consumer customers can access Band 14, that's part of the deal. AT&T can use it for what they want, as long as public safety can utilize it where needed.
But, keep in mind that FirstNet does not just run on Band 14, it uses the entire AT&T network.



The app just gives some access to their FirstNet account. I can do the same thing via their web portal. It allows agencies/users to request getting bumped up priority. FirstNet has several levels of priority and that is assigned based on the user. The new article made it sound like it was the app that made FirstNet work, or somehow magically made a non FirstNet phone work.
Has there been any fallout from the wide spread AT&T outage today? Many reported FirstNet outages. How severe was the impact?
 

lenk911

Member
Joined
Feb 24, 2007
Messages
186
Reaction score
211
Location
St Paul, MN
A good example is the State of Iowa's ISICS system. It's a statewide radio system that was built mostly by AT&T.
That is not correct. Iowa contracted with Motorola to build the first phase of the system which is basically a 700 MHZ P25 Phase 2 mobile trunk system. Portable operation is effectively where you can get it unless you use vehicular repeaters. System is basically about one site per county--some more some less. Locals can enhance the system to a level of portable on the belt operation in defined building densities on their dime. First Net may be a renter on some of the sites.

Many of the larger population counties have chosen to join the cooperative SARA system which is designed specifically for their needs. Generally portable on belt in a minimum of low density buildings. SARA is interconnected to ISICS.
 

mmckenna

I ♥ Ø
Joined
Jul 27, 2005
Messages
28,523
Reaction score
36,530
Location
United States
Has there been any fallout from the wide spread AT&T outage today? Many reported FirstNet outages. How severe was the impact?

I was getting outage alerts from FirstNet all day. My FirstNet phone has been working without issue. No idea what others are experiencing.
 

mmckenna

I ♥ Ø
Joined
Jul 27, 2005
Messages
28,523
Reaction score
36,530
Location
United States
Has there been any fallout from the wide spread AT&T outage today? Many reported FirstNet outages. How severe was the impact?

 

mmckenna

I ♥ Ø
Joined
Jul 27, 2005
Messages
28,523
Reaction score
36,530
Location
United States
My money is on a Cisco router update, they seem to be taking a page from the Motorola/Harris/Uniden playbook and using customers to beta test things:

 

GTR8000

NY/NJ Database Guy
Database Admin
Joined
Oct 4, 2007
Messages
17,062
Reaction score
16,538
Location
BEE00
But...but...LTE is going to completely replace traditional LMR within a few years, according to some "experts"!

LTE/FirstNet/Frontline absolutely has its place in today's world, in particular to supplement or extend RF coverage, but sorry at this stage of the game it's not quite ready to fully supplant a properly designed, constructed, and maintained LMR system for mission critical public safety comms, despite what some of the cheerleaders/fanboys claim. This morning's outage was a stark reminder of that.

Oh and to answer the question, there were public safety comm outages in Westchester County, NY as a result of the AT&T issues this morning. Unfortunately there are some agencies that are relying a little too heavily on FirstNet in lieu of proper RF coverage, or are using FirstNet to link critical infrastructure instead of using microwave or even commercial fiber. Scary stuff.
 

GTR8000

NY/NJ Database Guy
Database Admin
Joined
Oct 4, 2007
Messages
17,062
Reaction score
16,538
Location
BEE00
And before anyone gets all defensive about my post...I'm not dismissing the usefulness of LTE. I'm simply stating that maybe we pump the brakes a bit on the rush to toss all the "antiquated" radios in the dumpster. I think an often overlooked (or ignored) fact is that FirstNet and Frontline run over the same AT&T and VZW infrastructure and backhaul as the commercial (public) LTE networks. The cores may be separate, they may provide priority/preemption for those subscribers...but at the end of the day, you are at the mercy of commercial carriers and how well they maintain their equipment at the local level. Or in this case, a software update that negatively affected the entire network.

At the very least, ask yourself this: If FirstNet were truly segregated from the rest of AT&T's network, how did a software update deal a blow to both FirstNet and the public network simultaneously? Not exactly confidence inspiring if you've decided to rely completely on LTE, huh? :unsure:
 

RFI-EMI-GUY

Member
Joined
Dec 22, 2013
Messages
8,414
Reaction score
5,786
Snip

At the very least, ask yourself this: If FirstNet were truly segregated from the rest of AT&T's network, how did a software update deal a blow to both FirstNet and the public network simultaneously? Not exactly confidence inspiring if you've decided to rely completely on LTE, huh? :unsure:
Yeah that came to mind as well. You would hope those systems would be as isolated from each other as thoroughly as possible and that Firstnet receives updates only after vetted on the commercial side. Seems that the two systems are intermingled.
 

mmckenna

I ♥ Ø
Joined
Jul 27, 2005
Messages
28,523
Reaction score
36,530
Location
United States
I've seen a few maps on line that showed pockets of outage based on the number of complaints.
That either suggests that many didn't notice/didn't complain, or that it was not a true systemwide outage.

Makes me think that it was a router/radio issue. Like they tried to upgrade some equipment and it failed.

Will be interesting to see if the NPSBN guys at the .gov will start asking questions.

AT&T wireline lost a bunch of fiber many years ago in my area due to two very specific locations of vandalism/sabotage. It didn't take long for public safety agencies to grab AT&T by their figurative collar and ask some hard questions. Shortly after that, a lot of new fiber was laid to provide more redundancy. For some reason AT&T thought that putting operational and protection circuits in the same physical cable was "good enough".
In other words, AT&T getting a black eye from this will probably result in some good changes to their network topology/configuration.
 

alcahuete

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jul 24, 2015
Messages
2,879
Reaction score
2,796
Location
Southern California
No outages for me here in LA County, even though it's showing on the map. Was using the phone all day.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top