Havana Syndrome

Natty01

Newbie
Joined
Jul 6, 2024
Messages
2
Only ultraviolet, x-rays and gamma rays can do that.
Frequencies lower than UV (light, IR, RF) are non-ionizing radiation.


If only ultraviolet, x-rays and gamma rays can cause this, would it be possible to affect people in a domestic setting?

How would Knocking electrons out of molecules effect the human body/ organic matter? And if this has happened, can it be reversed?

And how would people be able to guard/defend themselves against this if it is possible?
 

MUTNAV

Active Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jul 27, 2018
Messages
1,314
If only ultraviolet, x-rays and gamma rays can cause this, would it be possible to affect people in a domestic setting?

How would Knocking electrons out of molecules effect the human body/ organic matter? And if this has happened, can it be reversed?

And how would people be able to guard/defend themselves against this if it is possible?
Ok.... What he said is a little misleading, in context it was correct, he's kind of talking about radiated energy.

Radioactive material also does this (stripping an electron from a molecule). Alpha and beta ( and neutrons) would then be included.

The worst effect is when it damages DNA, which can cause cancer (IMHO).

A persons body can repair a certain amount of radiation damage, and does so all of the time, if levels are low enough.

This is WAY out of the scope of radio-reference level comments. Need to go to a site specializing in nuclear, health, and related things etc...

Sorry,
Thanks
Joel
 

nd5y

Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
11,877
Location
Wichita Falls, TX
If only ultraviolet, x-rays and gamma rays can cause this, would it be possible to affect people in a domestic setting?
I don't know what a domestic setting is.
How would Knocking electrons out of molecules effect the human body/ organic matter? And if this has happened, can it be reversed?
You need to study ionizing radiation and non-ionizing radiation.
RF is non-ionizing but it can cause heating which in some cases can do the same thing or cause worse damage immediately like any other burn injury.
And how would people be able to guard/defend themselves against this if it is possible?
Avoid sunlight.

Build a bunker out of several feet thick concrete. Line it with lead bricks. If you want maximum protection gold is more dense and protects against radiation more than lead so use gold bricks if you can afford it. Then never leave the bunker.
 

prcguy

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jun 30, 2006
Messages
16,799
Location
So Cal - Richardson, TX - Tewksbury, MA
If only ultraviolet, x-rays and gamma rays can cause this, would it be possible to affect people in a domestic setting?

How would Knocking electrons out of molecules effect the human body/ organic matter? And if this has happened, can it be reversed?

And how would people be able to guard/defend themselves against this if it is possible?
If you had a neighbor that you didn’t like and got a large surplus X-Ray machine and pointed it through the wall at them and ran it often I suspect you could do some damage over time.
 

MUTNAV

Active Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jul 27, 2018
Messages
1,314
OR... If you live in an area with high Radon levels and have a poorly ventilated basement, that could cause a problem over time....

Thanks
Joel
 

dlwtrunked

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
2,423
...

How would Knocking electrons out of molecules effect the human body/ organic matter? And if this has happened, can it be reversed?

And how would people be able to guard/defend themselves against this if it is possible?
You need to research this. Most people know that radiation like this is a primary cause of cancer and genetic mutations. Cumulative background radiations (radioactive substances in soil, cosmic rays, and medical X-rays all contribute). It cannot be reversed and as far as treatment, cancer is only sometimes curable. Generally there is not much you can do about it.
 

RFI-EMI-GUY

Member
Joined
Dec 22, 2013
Messages
7,537
"Havana Syndrome" is a very real thing. The news magazine TV show 60 Minutes covered it. Here's an article from The Guardian on DC attacks. White House investigating ‘unexplained health incidents’ similar to Havana syndrome

In synopsis, the CIA doesn't believe it's a foreign actor.

The device may be an electromagnetic pulsed energy device.
I am pretty conflicted on this. As a long time sufferer of Tinnitus, I recognize that there are health phenomenon that defy explanation.

On the other hand, there is simple technology that uses microwaves to create auditory disruption, by actually superheating water in the inner ear. It is a well known, and studied effect, that was first noticed in WWII with radar.

Our governments denial of this "Havana syndrome" may be cover for the possibility our CIA is doing the exact same thing to adversaries. An interesting study would be to reverse engineer the system required to do this from afar. Could the required equipment fit in a small van? Could the beam travel 100 feet into a window? Could two beams from separate transmitters at reduced level be converged to isolate the beam energy to one individual? Could the beams convey tracking/radar information about the target moving about in a hotel room? Could the equipment be carried into a hotel room by hand luggage? I think all of this is very possible.
 

prcguy

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jun 30, 2006
Messages
16,799
Location
So Cal - Richardson, TX - Tewksbury, MA
1. Could the required equipment fit in a small van? Yes.
2. Could the beam travel 100 feet into a window? Yes.
3. Could two beams from separate transmitters at reduced level be converged to isolate the beam energy to one individual? Sort of.
4. Could the beams convey tracking/radar information about the target moving about in a hotel room? Yes.
5. Could the equipment be carried into a hotel room by hand luggage? Yes.
 

RFI-EMI-GUY

Member
Joined
Dec 22, 2013
Messages
7,537
1. Could the required equipment fit in a small van? Yes.
2. Could the beam travel 100 feet into a window? Yes.
3. Could two beams from separate transmitters at reduced level be converged to isolate the beam energy to one individual? Sort of.
4. Could the beams convey tracking/radar information about the target moving about in a hotel room? Yes.
5. Could the equipment be carried into a hotel room by hand luggage? Yes.
I believe this "thing" has been constructed and deployed by US as well as an adversary, likely Russia. The US is deflecting on the issue because the question will come up in hearings. If they have it why don't we have it? Well, err, yup we have it.


Had it for over a decade:

 
Last edited:

MUTNAV

Active Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jul 27, 2018
Messages
1,314
I am pretty conflicted on this. As a long time sufferer of Tinnitus, I recognize that there are health phenomenon that defy explanation.

On the other hand, there is simple technology that uses microwaves to create auditory disruption, by actually superheating water in the inner ear. It is a well known, and studied effect, that was first noticed in WWII with radar.

Our governments denial of this "Havana syndrome" may be cover for the possibility our CIA is doing the exact same thing to adversaries. An interesting study would be to reverse engineer the system required to do this from afar. Could the required equipment fit in a small van? Could the beam travel 100 feet into a window? Could two beams from separate transmitters at reduced level be converged to isolate the beam energy to one individual? Could the beams convey tracking/radar information about the target moving about in a hotel room? Could the equipment be carried into a hotel room by hand luggage? I think all of this is very possible.
Another reason to deny such things exist, is that if it turn out to be something easy to replicate, how many jerks with a grudge against their neighbor would want / make a device that could do this kind of thing.

In an high energy weapon thing, I believe congress asked what they could do to (to stop proliferation) and they were basically told they would have to ban the microwave oven.

I believe this "thing" has been constructed and deployed by US as well as an adversary, likely Russia. The US is deflecting on the issue because the question will come up in hearings. If they have it why don't we have it? Well, err, yup we have it.


Had it for over a decade:

There is also the possibility that it is so easy to replicate that every jerk that wants to mess with a neighbor would make and use it.

If I remember right, congress was asking a person testifying how to ban certain electronic weapons and the response from the expert testifying was that they would have to ban microwave ovens among other things.

Thanks
Joel
 

prcguy

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jun 30, 2006
Messages
16,799
Location
So Cal - Richardson, TX - Tewksbury, MA
Another reason to deny such things exist, is that if it turn out to be something easy to replicate, how many jerks with a grudge against their neighbor would want / make a device that could do this kind of thing.

In an high energy weapon thing, I believe congress asked what they could do to (to stop proliferation) and they were basically told they would have to ban the microwave oven.


There is also the possibility that it is so easy to replicate that every jerk that wants to mess with a neighbor would make and use it.

If I remember right, congress was asking a person testifying how to ban certain electronic weapons and the response from the expert testifying was that they would have to ban microwave ovens among other things.

Thanks
Joel
The Havana Syndrome may not be an intentional weapon but a side effect of eavesdropping via bouncing high power microwave signals off a device placed in a room to be monitored. Both Russia and the US are guilty of this although it appears the US can do it with much less RF power.
 

RFI-EMI-GUY

Member
Joined
Dec 22, 2013
Messages
7,537
The Havana Syndrome may not be an intentional weapon but a side effect of eavesdropping via bouncing high power microwave signals off a device placed in a room to be monitored. Both Russia and the US are guilty of this although it appears the US can do it with much less RF power.
Thanks to Edward Snowden I have the schematics to build my own passive bugs.
 

MUTNAV

Active Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jul 27, 2018
Messages
1,314
The Havana Syndrome may not be an intentional weapon but a side effect of eavesdropping via bouncing high power microwave signals off a device placed in a room to be monitored. Both Russia and the US are guilty of this although it appears the US can do it with much less RF power.
Could be.....

Information gained would be far more valuable than hurting the people with the information.

Like when the navy shot down (Yamamotos?) airplane during WWII. It was cited as a victory, but behind the scenes (if I understand it correctly), the shoot down caused the Japanese to realize their current codes had been broken. The loss of the communications intercept capability was a huge.

Thanks
Joel
 
Top