• To anyone looking to acquire commercial radio programming software:

    Please do not make requests for copies of radio programming software which is sold (or was sold) by the manufacturer for any monetary value. All requests will be deleted and a forum infraction issued. Making a request such as this is attempting to engage in software piracy and this forum cannot be involved or associated with this activity. The same goes for any private transaction via Private Message. Even if you attempt to engage in this activity in PM's we will still enforce the forum rules. Your PM's are not private and the administration has the right to read them if there's a hint to criminal activity.

    If you are having trouble legally obtaining software please state so. We do not want any hurt feelings when your vague post is mistaken for a free request. It is YOUR responsibility to properly word your request.

    To obtain Motorola software see the Sticky in the Motorola forum.

    The various other vendors often permit their dealers to sell the software online (i.e., Kenwood). Please use Google or some other search engine to find a dealer that sells the software. Typically each series or individual radio requires its own software package. Often the Kenwood software is less than $100 so don't be a cheapskate; just purchase it.

    For M/A Com/Harris/GE, etc: there are two software packages that program all current and past radios. One package is for conventional programming and the other for trunked programming. The trunked package is in upwards of $2,500. The conventional package is more reasonable though is still several hundred dollars. The benefit is you do not need multiple versions for each radio (unlike Motorola).

    This is a large and very visible forum. We cannot jeopardize the ability to provide the RadioReference services by allowing this activity to occur. Please respect this.

Hospital communications issue

Status
Not open for further replies.

Mike_G_D

Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
1,246
Reaction score
233
Location
Vista, CA
I put the BNC T on the VNA and had N to BNC adapters on the T, no cables.

Hmm, in that case, I either suspect the calibration or the quality of the connectors and/or dummy load.

1) Was a full calibration done at the test frequency using lab standards, open, short, and load?

2) What is the rated frequency range of the dummy loads used on the T.

I can see some reactive component from the T and BNC adapters but the test frequency seems a little low for that to contribute much. Anyway, the real part confirms the overall point: two 50 ohm loads in parallel = expected 25 ohms (or close enough).

-Mike
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2008
Messages
1,792
Reaction score
805
Location
Pittsboro IN
I didn't look at the T closely, the first one I pulled out of the bag had the center conductor for the long part of the T sticking out on one side, so quality is probably an issue.

I calibrated the device at IWCE with an Anritsu cal kit another instructor had, I don't own one but plan on getting one. I have a hard time spending $300+ for a calibrated open and short. The VNA has not been factory calibrated for 3 years, hard to believe I've had it that long.

>>Anyway, the real part confirms the overall point: two 50 ohm loads in parallel = expected 25 ohms (or close enough).

It is nice to see theory and measurements agree.
 

Mike_G_D

Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
1,246
Reaction score
233
Location
Vista, CA
I didn't look at the T closely, the first one I pulled out of the bag had the center conductor for the long part of the T sticking out on one side, so quality is probably an issue.

I calibrated the device at IWCE with an Anritsu cal kit another instructor had, I don't own one but plan on getting one. I have a hard time spending $300+ for a calibrated open and short. The VNA has not been factory calibrated for 3 years, hard to believe I've had it that long.

>>Anyway, the real part confirms the overall point: two 50 ohm loads in parallel = expected 25 ohms (or close enough).

It is nice to see theory and measurements agree.

At this frequency and for this purpose, just using an SMA female pcb mount with the through mounting legs soldered to the center pin for a short and another with nothing (preferably with the mounting legs cut off) for the open should be good enough. And if you lack a load, use another with a small (say, 0402 size) 50 ohm surface mount resistor (the tighter the tolerance the better) soldered between the center pin and the outer shield, again, with legs cut off preferably. I did this a lot when lab standards were not easily available and it gets you pretty close.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top