Is there an advantage to this? is it just easier if everyone used the UHF frequency.
(As you can see i am new to this)
They may have had the Low Band for many years. It is also possible they can not get the coverage they need on UHF from their existing transmitter site. The low power UHF radios are used as a link between the dispatch office and the base radio site instead of the need to lease a phone line for remote control if the base station is off premises or in a different building on the campus.
I suspect this is a legacy system and it still works at lower cost that installing a full UHF repeater system. They may be in the process of moving to a leased UHF conventional or trunked repeater system to eventually replace the Low Band. UHF is pretty much line of sight coverage so you need a tower on the highest point in the area while Low Band is not shadowed as much by hills and valleys so the base sites is not as critical.
A lot of rural school buses have used Low Band radios since the 1960s when that was current technology and stuck with it but the trend now is to go to UHF. Leasing service on trunked systems is a cost effective way of getting wide area coverage without the need to maintain their own base station.
Up here in western NY a lot of school buses are on the Mobiletech LTR-NET system and they have coverage all around the area when they go to other towns for sports events and field trips. School buses from districts way down in the Souther Tier like Corning or Addison can come to Rochester and still talk back to their home district. LTR-Net uses multiple repeater sites over a wide area and the mobiles "roam" automatically to work with the closest tower, much like cellular, and the sites are tied together over the Internet so the dispatcher communicates from a computer and many system include GPS tracking.
Even LTR-NET is old technology now and digital DMR Capacity Plus and NEXEDGE systems are now getting many school bus users.