• To anyone looking to acquire commercial radio programming software:

    Please do not make requests for copies of radio programming software which is sold (or was sold) by the manufacturer for any monetary value. All requests will be deleted and a forum infraction issued. Making a request such as this is attempting to engage in software piracy and this forum cannot be involved or associated with this activity. The same goes for any private transaction via Private Message. Even if you attempt to engage in this activity in PM's we will still enforce the forum rules. Your PM's are not private and the administration has the right to read them if there's a hint to criminal activity.

    If you are having trouble legally obtaining software please state so. We do not want any hurt feelings when your vague post is mistaken for a free request. It is YOUR responsibility to properly word your request.

    To obtain Motorola software see the Sticky in the Motorola forum.

    The various other vendors often permit their dealers to sell the software online (i.e., Kenwood). Please use Google or some other search engine to find a dealer that sells the software. Typically each series or individual radio requires its own software package. Often the Kenwood software is less than $100 so don't be a cheapskate; just purchase it.

    For M/A Com/Harris/GE, etc: there are two software packages that program all current and past radios. One package is for conventional programming and the other for trunked programming. The trunked package is in upwards of $2,500. The conventional package is more reasonable though is still several hundred dollars. The benefit is you do not need multiple versions for each radio (unlike Motorola).

    This is a large and very visible forum. We cannot jeopardize the ability to provide the RadioReference services by allowing this activity to occur. Please respect this.

Low Pass Filter Advantage

Status
Not open for further replies.

slowmover

Active Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2020
Messages
4,515
Reaction score
4,531
Location
Fort Worth
Cleaner is Meaner

A couple of videos (Scott’s Radio) covering the advantages of using Low Pass Filtration where an inexpensive outboard amp is used with a system. Inexpensive as it lacks RF filtration.





Second video features the MORGAN 411cb Bypass Filter.

One will hear that an LPF is not needed now that TV is a digital signal.

My experience is that the proliferation of dirt cheap low quality electronics makes some areas astonishingly noisy (BPF helps) and that spurious emissions means you’ll possibly cause interference yourself (LPF the actual minimum).

Worth examining.

The clean, quiet radio gets responses.
That’s STRONGLY a goal.

.
 
Last edited:

RFI-EMI-GUY

Member
Joined
Dec 22, 2013
Messages
8,394
Reaction score
5,759
That specific Morgan BandPass filter will also improve the receiver performance as all superhet receivers have some degree of out of band spurious responses which can degrade the on channel desired signal performance.
 

merlin

Active Member
Joined
Jul 3, 2003
Messages
3,981
Reaction score
1,895
Location
DN32su
Most quality radios meet FCC specs for harmonic emissions and a low pass filter won't do much.
Adding a cheap power amplifier, those lack post filtering so a LPF really should be used.
TVI makes no difference with ATSC, a strong signal will still overload TV front ends.
 

slowmover

Active Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2020
Messages
4,515
Reaction score
4,531
Location
Fort Worth
What one doesn’t at first realize in having installed 411cb or similar is that those on the other end are impressed by the increased quiet out of which one’s voice arises. You’ll get compliments.

Overcoming the deficiencies of the other mans typically poor rig.

These compliments are because their attention was heightened. This is crucial, IMO, in having “radio” (the communication art) operate best.

A BPF isn’t cheap. It doesn’t seem to quieten things that greatly. Until you get the TX feedback that twins the RX component. This has been true for me with “old tech” GALAXY 959, or with NRC QT60; even if less with the latter.

As I don’t operate except on 11M, a BPF has been a good choice. I’d call it optional. For me that’s been a mandatory option.

I also run a feedpoint choke at the antenna and a coax filter at the transceiver. “Overkill”, maybe.


My experience is that a cool head and a great radio rig becomes its own coordination point on which other men are relying as we identify, define, and solve what’s needed with a problem still underway up ahead.

So, there’s consideration of one’s neighbors at home or on the road, there’s cutting RX noise, and there’s less confusion from my TX when men are taking adrenaline hits at 68-MPH. And I’m nailing info points needed (state, road, direction, mile marker; etc).

Just remember that by loading up the coax it means more expense, more potential trouble points, and increased maintenance. No free lunch.

Need spares. Need tools. Onboard. Dedicated.

.
 
Last edited:

kc2asb

Member
Joined
Dec 31, 2015
Messages
2,258
Reaction score
3,637
Location
NYC Area
Most quality radios meet FCC specs for harmonic emissions and a low pass filter won't do much.
Adding a cheap power amplifier, those lack post filtering so a LPF really should be used.
TVI makes no difference with ATSC, a strong signal will still overload TV front ends.
Often times the fault lies with the TV itself. Ditto for other home entertainment equipment. 35 years ago, I was coming over my neighbor's TV (even when it was off!) despite using an FCC type accepted radios (Cobra 142GTL / Realistic TRC-30A), running legal power, good coax, etc.

Nothing cured the problem. I was in high school at the time and did not have the budget to pay for a cable TV subscription for the neighbor.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top