kayn1n32008
ØÆSØ Say it, say 'ENCRYPTION'
Some times it isn't about workload.Really the workload isn’t that much.
depending on the intensity of an event, it may not be feasible.It’s done very effectively around here. Any time you’re giving a phone number, sharing any sensitive CJIS stuff, describing anything personal in serious detail, you switch to your channel 3 (ops) which is encrypted. Same for complicated events best kept secret-ish. Normal dispatch stuff stays in the clear except for that. I believe that’s the best way for it to be done.
All VERY easily solved with OTAR, and multiple KMF's if agencies are paranoid.Better interoperability with clear dispatch channels when agencies don’t have the same encryption keys, without having to tie up statewide talkgroups.
LMFAO. The VAST majority of the public doesn't listen to publicsafety radio comms. Like a very small fraction of 1%.Keeps the public informed enough to be happy
You don't need to listen to radio comms to keep public safety accountable.and public safety accountable.