Multicoupler Jumpers

Status
Not open for further replies.

NYAirOne

Member
Joined
Nov 16, 2019
Messages
223
Location
Western, NY
What's the best low loss cables to use for jumpers from my multicoupler to radio rack? With the layout of my radios I'm looking at about 6ft for 2 radios, probably 4ft for 2 radios and at least 2ft for 2 radios. Cable from outside antenna is LMR400 buryflex direct to Stridesberg 8 port coupler.
 

mmckenna

I ♥ Ø
Joined
Jul 27, 2005
Messages
26,188
Location
United States
For a setup like that and such a short run, you don't need to go to something extreme.
The most important part is to have something light and flexible that won't put a lot of strain on the antenna connectors on the back of the radio.

Well constructed cables with the correct connectors is your goal. Avoid adapters.

If you are going to make them yourself, RG-58 would be just fine. For a short run like that, the additional loss isn't going to be noticeable. Especially if you are using an amplified coupler.

If you wanted to go a step up from RG-58, Times-Microwave LMR-195 or LMR-200 would be good. There are companies that will make custom cables for you. Order what you need in the correct lengths, as well as a spare or two.

For a short run like that, the amount of signal loss is so minimal, you won't be able to hear it. It's more important to look at flexibility and cable routing.
 

jcop225

Radio Zoomer
Joined
Nov 27, 2007
Messages
147
Location
Boston, MA
LMR240. It's cheap, easy to work with, low loss, high shielding and flexible enough for that application.

Next.
 

mmckenna

I ♥ Ø
Joined
Jul 27, 2005
Messages
26,188
Location
United States

prcguy

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jun 30, 2006
Messages
17,151
Location
So Cal - Richardson, TX - Tewksbury, MA

prcguy

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jun 30, 2006
Messages
17,151
Location
So Cal - Richardson, TX - Tewksbury, MA
Several charts online show RG316 and RG174 to have similar loss with some mfrs having slightly lower loss on the RG316. There is very little difference when using less than 10ft up to 1GHz.

I use RG174 for SMA connections in shack and to receivers. Same size/type as RG316 but almost half the attenuation.

/Ubbe
 

Ubbe

Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2006
Messages
10,027
Location
Stockholm, Sweden
Several charts online show RG316 and RG174 to have similar loss
You're probably right. The ones I have looked at favours the RG174 but it might depend of the quality of the coax, who the manufacturer are. I began using RG316 as that has double braid but then I switched to buying RG174 single braid as the charts I used seemed to show it to have less loss.

/Ubbe
 

vagrant

ker-muhj-uhn
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Nov 19, 2005
Messages
3,546
Location
California
If one is not in the mood to build their own patch cables check the link. This adds up pretty quick versus DIY, even with compression tool and some heat shrink tubing cost.

P.S. Some of the coaxial cable types mentioned in this thread are solid core. Look for UF (ultra flex) versions for short patch cables.

 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top