Well John, and for @tvengr too, I am learning some things from TVEngr's file that they kindly provided. There is definitely a difference in programming between my file and their file. I won't go in to the differences right now but with TVEngr's file loaded, I immediately started to receive transmissions. Then I was able to improve reception by changing the location of my indoor 800 MHz quarter-wave antenna which was selected mainly because of the AACo simulcast system reception challenges. As it turns out for Baltimore County, I believe a majority of reasons why I was not receiving anything was antenna location-location-location. The initial RSSI values as I recall were in the low 100s and now with the new antenna location (still an indoor 800 MHz quarter-wave) the RSSI values are now reaching the high 200s and low 300s.It would normally appear within a second or two of acquiring a signal with the tower so there wouldn't be a need to have to watch the screen for long...
One difference that @tvengr has in their file is they only put in the four frequencies that are assigned for use by the control channel. I have all thirty-two system frequencies in there so whenever the control channel lost lock due to a signal fade, the system had to potentially search a lot more frequencies to reacquire the control channel. Since I had a very low received signal, the system probably did a lot of hunting in my case based on my file construction. Between that and low signal levels, this is probably one reason I wasn't seeing "DAT" being indicated on the screen. Nothing was apparently being successfully decoded to begin with.
Now I have to find out when Kirk KC3PIT will be available to try out a new file for Baltimore County. I'll keep y'all posted. Thanks a million for getting us this far. I'll have to thoroughly scrutinize my file to see what all I have messed up in it.
73, Dave K4EET