Ohio MARCS database

[wv_mountaineer]

I really like that the Administrator(s) are putting the talk groups all together by county instead of in is own group. Much easier to reference this way. Thanks and keep up the good work!

 

[mtindor]

I really like that the Administrator(s) are putting the talk groups all together by county instead of in is own group. Much easier to reference this way. Thanks and keep up the good work!

I agree, it is much nicer like this. Tom is the one who did all the real work on that migration. You won't see everything migrated into the county categories, but a lot of things have been migrated.

Now you don't have half of the counties vacant/nonexistent, which tended to lead people to believe there was no MARCS traffic in their particular county.

Mike

 

[wa8pyr]

I really like that the Administrator(s) are putting the talk groups all together by county instead of in is own group. Much easier to reference this way. Thanks and keep up the good work!

You're welcome and thank you!!

 

[jimbolie1]

I like it as well,thanks Tom & keep up the good work!

 

[TedRHayes]

I too like the new arrangement, but would like to see another change to the site names.

I'd rather have the County name before the actual site name location. Most of the time I find I am organizing by County. When the name is truncated to 16 characters, the County name is often lost.