• To anyone looking to acquire commercial radio programming software:

    Please do not make requests for copies of radio programming software which is sold (or was sold) by the manufacturer for any monetary value. All requests will be deleted and a forum infraction issued. Making a request such as this is attempting to engage in software piracy and this forum cannot be involved or associated with this activity. The same goes for any private transaction via Private Message. Even if you attempt to engage in this activity in PM's we will still enforce the forum rules. Your PM's are not private and the administration has the right to read them if there's a hint to criminal activity.

    If you are having trouble legally obtaining software please state so. We do not want any hurt feelings when your vague post is mistaken for a free request. It is YOUR responsibility to properly word your request.

    To obtain Motorola software see the Sticky in the Motorola forum.

    The various other vendors often permit their dealers to sell the software online (i.e., Kenwood). Please use Google or some other search engine to find a dealer that sells the software. Typically each series or individual radio requires its own software package. Often the Kenwood software is less than $100 so don't be a cheapskate; just purchase it.

    For M/A Com/Harris/GE, etc: there are two software packages that program all current and past radios. One package is for conventional programming and the other for trunked programming. The trunked package is in upwards of $2,500. The conventional package is more reasonable though is still several hundred dollars. The benefit is you do not need multiple versions for each radio (unlike Motorola).

    This is a large and very visible forum. We cannot jeopardize the ability to provide the RadioReference services by allowing this activity to occur. Please respect this.

Programing a Trunked radio for monitoring only

Status
Not open for further replies.

scanningisfun

Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2010
Messages
689
I know it would be cool to have an actual radio---but if you can have a scanner that works just as well, why not use the scanner? I was on the side of the radio until I realized the scanner will work fine. The digital P25 decoding on uniden scanners is fine to me. You can understand it and there is no risk of transmitting at all. :)
 

Skypilot007

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 26, 2005
Messages
2,568
Location
Medford, NJ
I know it would be cool to have an actual radio---but if you can have a scanner that works just as well, why not use the scanner? I was on the side of the radio until I realized the scanner will work fine. The digital P25 decoding on uniden scanners is fine to me. You can understand it and there is no risk of transmitting at all. :)

It is cool ! I have plenty of scanners too, they have their uses. For me I always used motorola radios as scanners from way back when everything was simple and conventional, they just work better for what I needed. Why let these trunking systems spoil my fun.
 

batwingtech

Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2010
Messages
32
Location
Montana
One of the problems with using a P-25 trunked radio as a RX only radio, is that the radio has to affiliate, and you use system resources to do your scanning, and during an event, depending on how many voice channels are available, you may be using resources that may be needed during an emergency for first responders. It's better to listen with a scanner, that doesn't require affiliation to the system.
 

scanningisfun

Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2010
Messages
689
One of the problems with using a P-25 trunked radio as a RX only radio, is that the radio has to affiliate, and you use system resources to do your scanning, and during an event, depending on how many voice channels are available, you may be using resources that may be needed during an emergency for first responders. It's better to listen with a scanner, that doesn't require affiliation to the system.

Did you read the thread? That was already stated a lot. ;)
 

mm

Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
659
Location
oregon
How are you going to get caught if you don't transmit and you cannot transmit any RF ?

I was one of the individuals who wrote one of the original articles on batlabs, along with Elroy Jetson, about using an XTS5000 to monitor a 700/800 trunking systems a few years ago.

The radio used for our Phoenix systems tests had it's Output LDMOS power amplifier and its driver amplifier IC removed during the trial tests and the VCO output stage was loaded with a 50 ohm 10 dB attenuator pad made from chip resistors just to keep the VCO stable and the radio still tracked the Phoenix AZ system during the test just fine.

There wasn't even -60 dBm of power coming out of the radio no matter what the state of the radios TX Inhibit was set to, nothing to detect and nothing to affiliate with.

The only problem with a XTS or similar radio used to monitor a trunk system was that your locked with scanning 1 trunk system and 10 talkgroups, my tests years ago were only for a theoretical question as to whether it could be monitored safely and it could.

Unfortunately or maybe more fortunately, there are no P25 systems anywhere near my new QTH and I don't have any radios to play with anymore.


Mike
 

scanningisfun

Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2010
Messages
689
How are you going to get caught if you don't transmit and you cannot transmit any RF ?

I was one of the individuals who wrote one of the original articles on batlabs, along with Elroy Jetson, about using an XTS5000 to monitor a 700/800 trunking systems a few years ago.

The radio used for our Phoenix systems tests had it's Output LDMOS power amplifier and its driver amplifier IC removed during the trial tests and the VCO output stage was loaded with a 50 ohm 10 dB attenuator pad made from chip resistors just to keep the VCO stable and the radio still tracked the Phoenix AZ system during the test just fine.

There wasn't even -60 dBm of power coming out of the radio no matter what the state of the radios TX Inhibit was set to, nothing to detect and nothing to affiliate with.

The only problem with a XTS or similar radio used to monitor a trunk system was that your locked with scanning 1 trunk system and 10 talkgroups, my tests years ago were only for a theoretical question as to whether it could be monitored safely and it could.

Unfortunately or maybe more fortunately, there are no P25 systems anywhere near my new QTH and I don't have any radios to play with anymore.


Mike

According to the smart people near the beginning of the thread, you have to affiliate with P25 trunking systems which means they will see your radio on their system. When they see some random RID you will get into trouble.
 

mm

Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
659
Location
oregon
Easter Bunny, Santa Claus, Great Pumpkin whatever they want to think they can but thinking and doing it are entirely different.

The only reason that I removed the RF devices from the test radio was because the LDMOS power transistor was already damaged and my friend asked if the radio would work without the transmitter working and I of course just had to find out so I decided to remove the driver IC and use this radio for our tests but you can also use a method mentioned by Elroy which is less obtrusive to the radio.

My tests were done as I said from a challenge question asked by a friend at an unnamed agency down in Phoenix who asked if it could be done and the Easter Bunny wasn't even around to supervise us.
 

Seadoo

Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
165
MM, Besides being a very very hot topic for me and many system admins, In order for your radio to trunk a p25 system, unlike the legacy trunking motorola systems, The radio must affiliate with a p25 system to trunk, if you remove the transmitter part of the system, then obviously it cant transmit hense no affiliation. Stick to a scanner as mentioned before, because all you will end up with is a bricked radio, And belive me, if they are anything like me which I know a few radio system admins, it will get bricked. Not trying to flame you, but please stick to a scanner.
 

exkalibur

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Aug 15, 2006
Messages
2,932
Location
York, Ontario
In order for your radio to trunk a p25 system, unlike the legacy trunking motorola systems, The radio must affiliate with a p25 system to trunk,

Not trying to flame you, but that is simply NOT true. It is not a requirement of a P25 radio to affiliate with the system in order to receive. There's been a few threads in here explaining it. Elroy Jetson provided the information on how to do this.
 

Skypilot007

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 26, 2005
Messages
2,568
Location
Medford, NJ
One of the problems with using a P-25 trunked radio as a RX only radio, is that the radio has to affiliate, and you use system resources to do your scanning, and during an event, depending on how many voice channels are available, you may be using resources that may be needed during an emergency for first responders. It's better to listen with a scanner, that doesn't require affiliation to the system.

The radio doen't have to affiliate to receive transmissions if you know how to program the radio properly. Therefore no system resources are used ever. The radio is invisible to the system.
 

wa1emt

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Feb 8, 2007
Messages
56
Location
Houston, Tx
its funny how this guy asks the same question i did a while back..he gets flame kissed and i got lit up like the 4th of july....wow...guess it depends on who is on radio po-po duty....
 
Joined
Jan 27, 2008
Messages
83
Location
Scottsbluff, NE 69361
its funny how this guy asks the same question i did a while back..he gets flame kissed and i got lit up like the 4th of july....wow...guess it depends on who is on radio po-po duty....

it also depends on who the member is thats asking the question as to how badly they get flamed or if they get flamed at all.
 

wa1emt

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Feb 8, 2007
Messages
56
Location
Houston, Tx
oh...well would you like to pm me and let me know what i did to you..which i know was nothing....
 
Joined
Jan 27, 2008
Messages
83
Location
Scottsbluff, NE 69361
I sure long for the good ol days of batlabs back in the mid to late 90's when you had truly knowledgeable people like "elroy" who dispensed pure unbiased tech advice and not unsolicited legal advice and on the rare occasions that he did flame someone he did it with such comical flare that you were ROTFL for hours over it.
 

kb0uxv

Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2009
Messages
230
Location
Minnesota
its funny how this guy asks the same question i did a while back..he gets flame kissed and i got lit up like the 4th of july....wow...guess it depends on who is on radio po-po duty....

Perhaps the difference is do to the tone of the posts.
 

bezking

Member
Joined
Aug 5, 2006
Messages
2,656
Location
On the Road
It really just has to do with the fact that I haven't checked on this thread until now. :lol:

Now, to all of you, for the millionth time, please READ THE ENTIRE THREAD to make sure you aren't posting/asking something that's already been discussed. Thanks!
 

SCPD

QRT
Joined
Feb 24, 2001
Messages
0
Location
Virginia
Now, to all of you, for the millionth time, please READ THE ENTIRE THREAD to make sure you aren't posting/asking something that's already been discussed. Thanks!

...which is why this thread should be closed. There is nothing meaningful left to add. It's all been said. As I said before, each ttime this thread becomes active, I hope to see new information...instead it's more of the same old crap. Everyone responds in innuendo and speculation, such as "sure, I've done it" but informative posts such as discussion of creating system keys, inhibiting transmit, and the like are are non-existent or buried in troll/flame/safp garbage or against RR Rules.

This thread is a wasteland.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top