Yeah, Rogers is already donating a ****load of cellphones for the event. Since they don't offer any PTT service, we can't very well to go Telus.
Hams won't be anywhere near this. Ever.
Hams won't be anywhere near this. Ever.
I think that we're seeing typical management mentality at work - the vendor says everything will be fine with three or four LTR channels and the tech/dispatcher who'll have to make it work says a disaster is pretty much a foregone conclusion; so as a manager, what do you do? If you go with the vendor's story, you get to be the hero who keeps saving the organization big bucks every year on the radio contract. If you listen to your tech, you're just making more work for yourself as you try to solve problems that just maybe don't need solving; after all, the vendor's people are the "experts" - they've been doing this stuff for ages, so they must know what they're talking about.DaveH said:Getting off the original topic, but it sounds like the people making
these decisions are missing some basics. Put this scenario to them: a
person with VSA waits while some blab with non-emergency traffic ties
up the channel. It would only take one such incident to hit home.
exkalibur said:Hams won't be anywhere near this. Ever.
That would probably work fine. As long as the Pride talkgroups had lower priority than PS groups, even a slew of major events (fires, shootings, etc.) wouldn't cause problems for the primary users. Too bad they haven't made it happen.125 said:I know its a little late for this but there was a good suggestion about going to Motorola for radios and then going to the CITY for air time yes go to the city, They can add talk groups or put you on spares for a week
It was the same (security) channel both times. First, they put in gear that isn't up to the duty cycle of a security channel at a big event and then they replace it with something that starts failing (going far enough off frequency to turn most of the comms to static and make my 246T's squelch stutter like Porky Pig) after a mere 31 hours. That's some MTBF.monkto said:One repeater blew up on Saturday, another was on its way out on Sunday night. One heck of an expensive under-provisioning for Action Radio...
Yeah, imagine that. I can understand how Action's performance would suffer due to tough realities (like lack of RF channels), but they have only themselves to blame for a useless repeater.rescue161 said:So what was the final outcome? I see that the system did exactly what you guys said it would do...
I doubt we'll ever see any public comment from any of the involved parties. The deficiencies reflect badly on all of them.What did Action Wireless Solutions have to say about it? Was the city upset?
One would surely hope so. At one point, I heard three simultaneous medical calls (including a VSA!) being handled on that crappy repeater. I just can't find the words to express how irresponsible the principals in this saga were.Is Action Wireless Solutions going to get the boot for next year?
Happened to be in the neighbourhood of 83 Galaxy Blvd, unit 34 yesterday; the nameplate for the premises lists Action Wireless, but the paper notice on the door says that the business is now called Airtime Communications. Wow, that took a whole four months!they might be using a different name by then, so maybe we'll be discussing Al's Friendly Radio Rentals instead.