iamhere300
Member
While that 200' tower may have been $60K in material costs in 1986, as you note the installation was extra. Today, the total project cost (removal of the destroyed tower, design engineering, permits, fabrication and installation) of a new 200' tower that meets current ANSI standards (TIA-222-G, Seismic Zone 4, 120 MPH winds, etc. with the loading that was on the tower that fell) may well be $1M by the time the tower is replaced.
I probably don't know a lot about this, and California is a world in its own, BUT, ATC will send to the manufacturers what they want to support, what their limitations are, and the manufacturers will be all over it to get a price for them.
Up until yesterday, we all were under the information that it was only 40 -60 feet, a very normal mountain top tower.
Now that further information reveals a height of allegedly 200 feet, then it takes on a whole nother outlook. Even as you suggest, with NORMAL zoning and permitting issues, as well as the fact it is a replacement for a tower, and not a new tower, a million is still quite a ways off. Even ATC, the tower owner of this tower, in 2011 stated that the average tower build, COMPLETE including all civil, etc is 200-225k.
Now, COULD it cost a million? Sure, and I could buy a new truck tomorrow to replace my 3/4 ton, and it COULD cost me 500k by the time I get done - but it won't.
But what do I know about towers and the tower industry.
I also hope they do something different on the anchors, if that tower was 200 feet, it sure does appear those anchors were very short spaced, you can see where they were beefed up at some point. With all that loading, who knows, it may have just fell.