Scanner Squelch Differences

Status
Not open for further replies.

N7CAS

Member
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
59
Location
Reno, Nevada, USA
Recently I brought my old Realistic PRO-2006 back to life (best scanner ever!) and set it up to scan in tandem with a Uniden BCD536HP (duplicate frequencies, different scan rates). My question is this: on the 2006, a particular analog service's signal has its characteristic squelch tail, yet on the 536 it has none whatsoever. Why is that?
 

millrad

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Apr 14, 2004
Messages
253
Location
Connecticut
At the risk of being called Captain Obvious, maybe the squelch threshold settings are different on the two scanners, resulting in a much faster closing time on one of them?
 

krokus

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jun 9, 2006
Messages
6,176
Location
Southeastern Michigan
Do you have the CTCSS setup for that freq, on the 536? The tone could turn off, before the RF drops.

Sent via Tapatalk
 

wtp

Member
Joined
Apr 3, 2008
Messages
6,674
Location
Port Charlotte FL
hystersis

something about different states.if set close to the open state it takes a higher state to close it, some would call it loose squelch. so try setting it a little higher.Bill Cheek had a fix for it in scanner modification handbook 2. cut a trace at an ic and add a 200k pot and adjust around 120k ohms to tighten the squelch.
 
Last edited:

sparklehorse

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
May 15, 2003
Messages
1,214
Location
Portland, Oregon
Do you have the CTCSS setup for that freq, on the 536? The tone could turn off, before the RF drops.


What he said.

I don't think the 2006 supported CTCSS or DCS tones, did it? So you'll have a squelch tail at the end of every transmission on your old rig. On my 536 I have tones entered for all the conventional frequencies I have tones for, which is roughly 3/4 of them. I'd say on half of those there is never a squelch tail due to the tone dropping prior to the carrier, which just depends on how the techs have the repeater set up. That's a nice benefit of CTCSS, it perplexes me when I see people here advise others to never use tones in their scanners. By the way the 536 is the best radio I have as far as squelching the squelch tails. Maybe the 2006 isn't the best scanner ever after all?

.
 

typesix

Member
Joined
Mar 22, 2006
Messages
93
Location
Boston, MA
No, the 2006 does not support tones, but it also has a very short squelch tail, shorter than Unidens of the day. In general for scanners of that time, GRE scanners had short squelch tails, while Unidens were all over the place, but with most having a noticeably long squelch tail.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top