Scanner Tales: More weird scanners

There have been some really weird scanners made over the years, I have written about some of them. Here are a couple more that I recall seeing here and there.

GE Searcher

This thing (well two things actually) was a neat idea but flawed in execution. There was a handheld version as well as a desktop/luggable one. Both used the same method of “programming”. Each of the four channels had individual tuning knobs so one could tune it to whatever frequency they wanted as long as it was on the VHF high-band. The smaller one used a set of 6 AA cells, the big guy used 6 D-Cells or AC house current. The big’un also had an AM/FM radio so it could provide tunes or the local news.

I remember seeing these at the local Radio Shack back in the mid and late 1970’s. I don’t think they were a catalog item however, but some stores sold stuff that wasn’t in the catalog. They were also sold in other stores, I think they had them at places like Montgomery Wards and Service Merchandise.

The handheld version was bulky, even by 1970’s standards. Tuning it was pretty difficult, you had to wait until the station you wanted to hear was transmitting and hope you found it before they finished talking. While that was the norm for any tunable receiver then, it was more difficult as the knobs and range of motion was very limited on this radio. Once you did find the right station the radio was pretty stable.

The bigger radio, like many other portable radios of the time, was designed to be used at home or outside. You could plug it in to a wall outlet or run off the D-Cell batteries. Battery life was pretty poor but the AM/FM audio was darned good. The scanner was the same as the handheld one but it had an meter that doubled as a relative frequency display and battery level. One would think it would have also been used for signal strength but one would be wrong.

I played with one or two of these back then in the stores and I had a friend who had one. They were too expensive and limited to high-band only (so no State Police or UHF police channels in my area).

Bearcat BC-E 8-track scanner

This was actually a pretty effective little device from the early 1980’s. It was a VHF high and low band 4-channel scanner that was built into an 8-track cartridge and was plugged into your 8-track player. It had a door on the bottom for crystals and the audio came out the stereo speakers. Power came from the 8-track player, I assume they had some sort of power provided to the tape head or something.

My Dad had one of these in his Buick. He was heavily into 8-tracks and stayed with them even long after the rest of the world switched to Cassettes and later CD’s. He already had a CB in the car (at the time everyone did) and did not want another antenna on the car. He got one of these at Wards and I got some crystals for the local channels for him. The darned thing worked great!

The reception was darned good considering there was no outside antenna capability. Somehow it was able to utilize the stereo for the antenna as well as power and audio delivery. It used the same 10.8 MHz. IF crystals as other Bearcat scanners of the era.

We had the local police, fire and Sheriff’s channels in that little radio and it got a lot of use. It disappeared eventually, I never figured out whatever happened to it.

Scanocular

This was quite possibly the weirdest radio I ever saw. I had seen pictures and heard stories about this but never saw one until I set up the Scanner Master Museum. Made by (or rather for) Memorex (the recording tape guys) I suspect the scanner part was supplied by Uniden or one of its suppliers.

This thing was a 100-channel scanner covering the VHF high, UHF and 800 bands as well as FM and TV audio. It was built upon a set of 8x25 binoculars. Intended for the race or airshow fan in particular, the idea was that you could watch the action and listen to the scanner at the same time.

I never really got a chance to use one of these but from what I have seen and heard neither the scanner nor the binoculars were very good. It did not have a speaker; you used earphones only. Probably a good thing as the sound levels would have made a speaker pretty much useless at racetracks and airshows anyway.

Regency MX7000

I have written about this before but it bears repeating here it was so weird. When it was introduced the ads showed a case the same as the then current Regency scanner and RH256 two-way radios with a wedged front panel. I thought this would be great, my first 800 MHz. scanner and I could slot it right in where the M100 was in my car with my UHF and VHF Regency mobiles. When I got it however I discovered that the MX7000 was markedly smaller than the other Regency radios and had no mounting holes. It didn’t even have a mounting bracket for the car.

Eventually I was able to source a compression bracket for it but it too was weird. I did try it out in the car but reverted to my trusty M100 as it had a faster scan rate and fit the aesthetic I had going at the time.

The MX7000 was possible the most sensitive scanner I ever had. It would pick up full-scale stuff on a whip antenna that barely ticked the squelch on another scanner on an outside antenna. It also had full coverage, including the cellular bands and was one of the first radios I used for Military Aviation. It had however very poor selectivity.

The biggest problem was the scan speed. You could measure it with a calendar if you were patient, it was that slow. The other issue was the power connector. While it came with an AC power cable, the connector was this weird 3-pin thing in a triangle layout. I ended up drilling a hole in the back of my radio and putting in a coaxial power plug.

Radio Shack PRO2026

This was the first scanner I ever bought that I truly and deeply hated. This thing was an abomination from the start. Built by Uniden for RadioShack, it took all the good Uniden features out and replaced them with all the bad Radio Shack ones. One of the big difference between Radio Shack scanners and those by Uniden/Bearcat and Regency was that one needed to press the “Program” button on RadioShack scanners to go into programming mode. On other scanners you could just type in the frequency and press Enter.

The PRO2026 was basically a neutered BC760XLT, same case style and shared innards. Instead of the easy programming of the BC760 and it’s kin one had to use the silly Program button on the 2026 in order to program it. They also had to add a couple additional buttons to the 2026 to handle the RadioShack programming methods, this made the action buttons under the display smaller and more difficult to operate.

Perhaps it was my aversion to the operation of the 2026 that clouded my opinion but I could have sworn it was far less sensitive and selective than the 760. I had both and always thought the 760 performed much better.

I never before nor since despised a scanner like I did the Pro2026. Perhaps it was unjustified but abhorrence rarely is.
 
Last edited:

ratboy

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Nov 3, 2004
Messages
1,113
Reaction score
316
Location
Toledo,Ohio
I had a ton of oddball scanners, including the Scanocular, and yes it was as bad, or worse than you heard. Mine useless at home, the truckers on the Turnpike made the squelch break constantly, and when the TARTA buses were busy, they could be heard almost anywhere in the 450-470Mhz range. Only out in the sticks was it "clean", and there wasn't constant squelch breaking and intermod/images. Later on, I had the binocs with the digital camera built into them too, another dud product. They could have made it so much better with very little effort.

A lot of Uniden built radios shared the TARTA problem. I had the infamous Regency HX-2000, which had the "crunchy squelch"that I finally modded to fix it. A friend bought it from me and less than a week later, dropped it into the Maumee river near downtown and that was the end of it. Other oddballs were the Yupiteru 9000, Welz 1000, Maycom 108(I still have it), AR900, and a bunch of HT's that were at least fair scanners, like the Standard C510, which wasn't bad at all, except for the weak audio. A lot of those radios were tons better with an earphone. I can only take about an hour with head/earphones and I'm done. Programming some of those oddballs was tedious beyond belief. And in the case of the AR900, it locked up all the time, and to get it working again, you had to lose everything.
 

Falcon9h

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jan 31, 2020
Messages
452
Reaction score
416
Memorable thread! I have a Searcher (big one) that I picked up but sensitivity is non-existent. Had an MX-7000 but it was quirky and full of birdies. AOR was, and is, totally unaffordable. I wish I never got rid of thr HX-1000. Best scanner I ever had and I koved the HT look. Never got to try the MR8100, and they go for big bucks now. (Fat fingers giving up correcting. 🤬)
 

Eng74

Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
2,106
Reaction score
337
Location
Kern County, CA
The 2026 was the first scanner I had as a mobile scanner in my 1984 Ford Ranger. It had a pretty good speaker in it.
 

Nasby

Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2004
Messages
2,772
Reaction score
492
Location
Ohio
I actually loved the 2026. Yeah it was quirky to program but back then, frequencies seldom changed. So once it was programmed it was set.

The best thing was its size!
It could easily be mounted in almost any vehicle.

The monstrous size of the Pro2004, Pro2006 and other so-called mobile scanners made them very cumbersome and nearly impractical to install and use in a vehicle.
 

kc8jwt

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Feb 25, 2011
Messages
58
Reaction score
66
Location
Belpre, OH
I actaully still have a Pro-2026 and it still works. I had it in my car mounted on top of my CB at the time. When I got into ham radio, It was part of the mount with that as well. With the area that I scanned it was pretty rural, so I didn't suffer those sensitivity issues. Even where I have it now, in a more urban setting I don't have to many issues.
 

fxdscon

¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jan 15, 2007
Messages
7,587
Reaction score
3,769
.

My Sears 5 band programmable scanner (made by SBE). Programmed with slide-in 16 position punch cards. Best sounding audio of any scanner I've owned.

IMG_1268small.jpg


1749511818695.jpeg
 

N9JIG

Sheriff
Moderator
Joined
Dec 14, 2001
Messages
6,358
Reaction score
5,473
Location
Far NW Valley
My Sears 5 band programmable scanner (made by SBE). Programmed with slide-in 16 position punch cards. Best sounding audio of any scanner I've owned.
There was a guy making after-market cards for the SBE scanners I read about years back, I suppose they could be made of properly sized cardboard.

There was also a source years back for combs for the Regency Whamo-10, another weird radio I have written about in the past.
 

fxdscon

¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jan 15, 2007
Messages
7,587
Reaction score
3,769
I suppose they could be made of properly sized cardboard.

The original cards had numbered squares that you peeled off of the top surface of the card to reveal a punched hole under that square. I had it in storage for a while, and when I pulled it out those cards had curled up and the sticky squares dried out and fell off. After very careful measuring of the 2 remaining originals I had that were pinned flat under some books, and many trial and error attempts, I was finally able to come up with a PDF template for reproductions that work very well.

The working cards are printed on 40lb card stock. The card on the right in the pic is punched for local NOAA @ 162.475. Punch code for that is 0010101100011000 (1=punch, 0=no punch). I use a 1/8 punch for the holes, it's surprising how precise they need to be to function correctly.
 

kc2asb

Member
Joined
Dec 31, 2015
Messages
1,957
Reaction score
2,974
Location
NYC Area
.My Sears 5 band programmable scanner (made by SBE). Programmed with slide-in 16 position punch cards. Best sounding audio of any scanner I've owned.
Electra Bearcat, Radio Shack and Tennelec had a different approach, utilizing a codebook and 16 toggle switches to program in a binary code for each frequency. Regency had a model that used metal "combs" and teeth would be broken off to program the unit. Very innovative at the time. - no more expensive crystals needed
 
Last edited:

dispatchgeek

Control channel goes "brrrrr"
Joined
Feb 29, 2004
Messages
417
Reaction score
406
Location
Between the cornfields and the pastures, Michigan.
I'm gonna add to this thread- The Sony Wavehawk
icfsc1b.jpg


I bought one at a hamfest. I wanted to love it, but the mental and physical gymnastics of programming the thing was a chore. If I remember right, programming a channel involved holding down multiple buttons while entering your frequency. It was also only double conversion and sometimes suffered from interference where other scanners were happily scanning away.

I just couldn't love this like I wanted to. I like the form factor, it did pretty well on airshow monitoring as well. Programming it just... sucked. I eventually sold it on eBay for more than I paid for it.
 

ratboy

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Nov 3, 2004
Messages
1,113
Reaction score
316
Location
Toledo,Ohio
I'm gonna add to this thread- The Sony Wavehawk
icfsc1b.jpg


I bought one at a hamfest. I wanted to love it, but the mental and physical gymnastics of programming the thing was a chore. If I remember right, programming a channel involved holding down multiple buttons while entering your frequency. It was also only double conversion and sometimes suffered from interference where other scanners were happily scanning away.

I just couldn't love this like I wanted to. I like the form factor, it did pretty well on airshow monitoring as well. Programming it just... sucked. I eventually sold it on eBay for more than I paid for it.
I didn't like mine either, and I took it down to Universal to see what I could get for it, but before they opened, I was sitting next to some train tracks and it was very busy with all kinds of rail traffic, and one of the guys who was in the motel nearby heard it, and ended up giving me what I paid for it a year earlier. I think he was a Sony fanboi, as when he saw the name he got all excited.
 

dispatchgeek

Control channel goes "brrrrr"
Joined
Feb 29, 2004
Messages
417
Reaction score
406
Location
Between the cornfields and the pastures, Michigan.
Proof positive- photo from the one time I let my Wavehawk really stretch its legs. We lived pretty close to our local airport at the time. Blue Angels were up. Wavehawk was handling the UHF Milair side, Pro-137 (another oddball?) was handling the air boss.
IMG_5898.jpeg
 

N9JIG

Sheriff
Moderator
Joined
Dec 14, 2001
Messages
6,358
Reaction score
5,473
Location
Far NW Valley
I don't think I ever had that Sony WaveHawk but always wanted one. One of the CARMA guys had one and it seemed to be a great receiver but like you guys said, a real bear to program. I ended up going the AR900 then AR8000 route instead at the time.

At the time Sony had a great reputation for high quality and good value. I wonder if this may have been a private-label product.
 

kc2asb

Member
Joined
Dec 31, 2015
Messages
1,957
Reaction score
2,974
Location
NYC Area
This one might qualify as slightly weird. I have one of these in my collection of vintage scanners, a Heathkit GR-110. Found it at a hamfest over 25 years ago. It's an 8 channel crystal scanner, with channels numbered zero through seven( 0 - 7) and a digital channel display. Probably one of the few scanners available as a kit. Mine powers up but I never had any luck getting it to receive.

 

Attachments

  • gr_110_169414.jpg
    gr_110_169414.jpg
    14.3 KB · Views: 22

dispatchgeek

Control channel goes "brrrrr"
Joined
Feb 29, 2004
Messages
417
Reaction score
406
Location
Between the cornfields and the pastures, Michigan.
I don't think I ever had that Sony WaveHawk but always wanted one. One of the CARMA guys had one and it seemed to be a great receiver but like you guys said, a real bear to program. I ended up going the AR900 then AR8000 route instead at the time.

At the time Sony had a great reputation for high quality and good value. I wonder if this may have been a private-label product.
I think it was a legit Sony product. The physical fit and feel was spot on for other Sony products of the era. The programming almost felt like it was logical to the engineer who designed the workflow, but not to the userbase that would be buying it.
 

kc2asb

Member
Joined
Dec 31, 2015
Messages
1,957
Reaction score
2,974
Location
NYC Area
I think it was a legit Sony product. The physical fit and feel was spot on for other Sony products of the era. The programming almost felt like it was logical to the engineer who designed the workflow, but not to the userbase that would be buying it.
It was not the only difficult-to-program scanner of the era. The AOR AR-1000 was notorious in this regard, and had a very poor instruction manual to boot. 1,000 channels, and it could only be programmed manually.
 

dispatchgeek

Control channel goes "brrrrr"
Joined
Feb 29, 2004
Messages
417
Reaction score
406
Location
Between the cornfields and the pastures, Michigan.
It was not the only difficult-to-program scanner of the era. The AOR AR-1000 was notorious in this regard, and had a very poor instruction manual to boot. 1,000 channels, and it could only be programmed manually.
I think I remember that from an AR-2515 I had as well. The memory structure was odd.
 

csh102

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Mar 30, 2012
Messages
5
Reaction score
2
I never did, but I knew someone that owned one. Analog only, no trunking, PC programmable, Alpha/numeric display.

If I recall correctly, CHP used them in some of their cars for a while. They had a unique wiring harness for them.
Folks, . . . Does anyone here recognize the specific wire harness connector style ? The original external speaker was the SP-1. I'm attempting to restore two of these old workhorses using the factory type connectors. Are they MOLEX, or Ampseal, or Amphenol ? I dunno.
 

Attachments

  • Uniden MR8100 Power Connector 1.jpg
    Uniden MR8100 Power Connector 1.jpg
    96.6 KB · Views: 30
  • Uniden MR8100 Power Connector 2.jpg
    Uniden MR8100 Power Connector 2.jpg
    83.4 KB · Views: 29
  • UNIDEN MR8100 Speaker Connector 1.jpg
    UNIDEN MR8100 Speaker Connector 1.jpg
    84.6 KB · Views: 23
  • Uniden MR8100 Speaker Connector 2.jpg
    Uniden MR8100 Speaker Connector 2.jpg
    91.7 KB · Views: 24
  • SP-1 Speaker Connector.jpg
    SP-1 Speaker Connector.jpg
    134 KB · Views: 30
Top