rbartolu
Member
I've had an SDS200 that I've used for a couple of years to monitor my local Fire/Rescue systems here in the Jacksonville, FL area. I recently purchased an SDS100 and have used Sentinel to program the 100 using the same config as the 200. What I've noticed is that for the most part I get similar performance between the two scanners however the SDS200 seems to work with our simulcast systems better than the SDS100 - is there something that I'm missing with the settings on the 100? I find that the 100 sometimes misses transmissions or gets garbled/distorted transmissions where the 200 has no problems (units sitting within a few feet of one another).