SDS200 -vs- SDS100

[pratzert]

I didn't see anther thread asking this, but I may have missed it.

But how does the SDS200 compare to the SDS100 for the reception of LSM?

Better... worse... or the same?

I don't know why, but I feel the SDD200 "may" be slightly superior, but I don't have one and can't really compare for myself.

Thanks !

 

[doctordialtone]

I didn't see anther thread asking this, but I may have missed it.

But how does the SDS200 compare to the SDS100 for the reception of LSM?

Better... worse... or the same?

Since they are both of the same design - I'd say no difference. SAME.

Let the debate begin!

 

[eaf1956]

I didn't see anther thread asking this, but I may have missed it.

But how does the SDS200 compare to the SDS100 for the reception of LSM?

Better... worse... or the same?

I don't know why, but I feel the SDD200 "may" be slightly superior, but I don't have one and can't really compare for myself.

Thanks !

I have both and the 100 on simulcast is on par with the 200.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

 

[TailGator911]

Same here. Both SDS's are the same on my local P25 simulcast system . My SDS200 has a slight edge on the 100 in the vhf/uhf analog spectrum. But, with LSM decoding they are tit for tat with each other. It is a beautiful thing to behold.

JD
kf4anc

 

[KR7CQ]

They are the same overall, but I agree with UPman that mobile / base units do better in high RF areas due to the metal case, and that there might be small advantages to having the components laid out in a larger space. I've never put the 100 on the multicoupler but I suppose I will add that to my list just to do some real head to head testing.