• To anyone looking to acquire commercial radio programming software:

    Please do not make requests for copies of radio programming software which is sold (or was sold) by the manufacturer for any monetary value. All requests will be deleted and a forum infraction issued. Making a request such as this is attempting to engage in software piracy and this forum cannot be involved or associated with this activity. The same goes for any private transaction via Private Message. Even if you attempt to engage in this activity in PM's we will still enforce the forum rules. Your PM's are not private and the administration has the right to read them if there's a hint to criminal activity.

    If you are having trouble legally obtaining software please state so. We do not want any hurt feelings when your vague post is mistaken for a free request. It is YOUR responsibility to properly word your request.

    To obtain Motorola software see the Sticky in the Motorola forum.

    The various other vendors often permit their dealers to sell the software online (i.e., Kenwood). Please use Google or some other search engine to find a dealer that sells the software. Typically each series or individual radio requires its own software package. Often the Kenwood software is less than $100 so don't be a cheapskate; just purchase it.

    For M/A Com/Harris/GE, etc: there are two software packages that program all current and past radios. One package is for conventional programming and the other for trunked programming. The trunked package is in upwards of $2,500. The conventional package is more reasonable though is still several hundred dollars. The benefit is you do not need multiple versions for each radio (unlike Motorola).

    This is a large and very visible forum. We cannot jeopardize the ability to provide the RadioReference services by allowing this activity to occur. Please respect this.

Simulcasting

Status
Not open for further replies.

Gilligan

Member
Database Admin
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
2,136
Reaction score
9
Location
Hagerstown, MD
I'm curious about something. I know simulcasting has been around a long time, and I know it works for conventional as well as trunking. But why don't the different towers interfere with each other. Even if the same audio is being transmitted, I would think that the signals would interfere with each other, kind of like when one police officer transmits at the same time as another and they "walk on each other."
 

SCPD

QRT
Joined
Feb 24, 2001
Messages
0
Reaction score
112
Location
Virginia
They do interfere with each other, you can especially detect this when monitoring from a long distance or are subject to multi-path where the signals reach you out of phase. It has to do with the timing of the broadcast and the audio.
 

Gilligan

Member
Database Admin
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
2,136
Reaction score
9
Location
Hagerstown, MD
Okay, now I can see where the signals being received at different times would be a problem. I guess that the idea is to have one site be much stronger than the other (as in how it's received by a mobile radio). Like here in OKC, there are 7 sites in the EDACS inner-city side, so I guess the closest one should bring in the strongest signal, thus overridding the others ???
 
N

N_Jay

Guest
The way to keep a simulcast system from interfering with itself is by synchronizing the signals in amplitude, phase, frequency, and timing.
Then you align them so in areas where the timing has become unacceptable due to propagation times, you design for capture (one signal significantly stronger then the other).
In areas where the signals are unavoidable close in strength, you have to make sure they are aligned in time.
Then you hope that there is some real-world compromise that makes it all work.
 

Big_Ears

Member
Joined
Feb 23, 2007
Messages
213
Reaction score
0
Back in the AM days, 2 signals transmitting on the same frequency would be received as hetrodyne where as you would hear the offset between the two frequencies. In FM there is the capture effect where the strongest signal will override the weaker one. I guess the issue would be if both received signals were exactly the same strength.
 
N

N_Jay

Guest
Big_Ears said:
Back in the AM days, 2 signals transmitting on the same frequency would be received as hetrodyne where as you would hear the offset between the two frequencies. In FM there is the capture effect where the strongest signal will override the weaker one. I guess the issue would be if both received signals were exactly the same strength.

The dont have to be exactly the same strength.

Capture is usually lost when the signals are within 6dB, so that is a 12 dB range.
On top of that you have to account for multi-path and fading which will be uncorrelated between the two signals. In the real world, you will start hearing some effects of the weaker signal when its mean is about 20 dB below the stronger signals mean level.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top