Solon Fire

Status
Not open for further replies.

KWs

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
603
Location
Kent , Ohio
Looks like Solon Fire changed their apparatus numbering system, units now have a 6 prefix... Engine 61, 62, 63 etc . I'm guessing since Chagrin Valley dispatches for them, they meeded to differentiate from Chagrin Fire vehicle numbering.
 

Swipesy

Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2003
Messages
1,725
Location
Northern Ohio
Looks like Solon Fire changed their apparatus numbering system, units now have a 6 prefix... Engine 61, 62, 63 etc . I'm guessing since Chagrin Valley dispatches for them, they meeded to differentiate from Chagrin Fire vehicle numbering.

You have guessed correctly. Station 1 Units are numbered 61, Station 2 Units are number 62 and 64 and Station 3 Units are numbered 63. Station 1 also has cars 60, 61,64, 65, 66 and Station 2 has car 62. The reason for the change is as you stated to help dispatcher at CVD to distinguish between Solon and Chagrin.
 
Last edited:

KWs

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
603
Location
Kent , Ohio
Cuyahoga County Fire must not have a master template for unit numbering ?
Some Depts use alpha/numeric , some use 2 digit, some use 3 digit and some 4 digit.
Now that Solon has gone 6x numbering, it matches Rocky River.
I'm guessing they will never respond together, but still seems odd.
 

Swipesy

Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2003
Messages
1,725
Location
Northern Ohio
I guess my logical accounting/finance mind does not work when it comes to anything government related but it would seem if the dispatcher and unit users would just say Chagrin Engine 1 or Solon Engine 1 problem solved. But then again I am sure government has a reason, logical or not for using their method.
 

SCPD

QRT
Joined
Feb 24, 2001
Messages
0
Location
Virginia
I guess my logical accounting/finance mind does not work when it comes to anything government related but it would seem if the dispatcher and unit users would just say Chagrin Engine 1 or Solon Engine 1 problem solved. But then again I am sure government has a reason, logical or not for using their method.
A lot of places do do that. Oh well......
 

wa8pyr

Technischer Guru
Lead Database Admin
Joined
Sep 22, 2002
Messages
5,066
Location
Ohio
I guess my logical accounting/finance mind does not work when it comes to anything government related but it would seem if the dispatcher and unit users would just say Chagrin Engine 1 or Solon Engine 1 problem solved. But then again I am sure government has a reason, logical or not for using their method.
There is a logical reason. Several, in fact. . .

Most CAD systems these days are looking for a unique number to identify the apparatus. It's faster and much more efficient to type "E61" instead of "Chagrin Engine 1."

In addition, emergency scenes get to be pretty confusing when there are three units on scene all called "Engine 1." Lots easier to say "Engine 61 to Engine 51" instead of "Chagrin Engine 1 to Solon Engine 1," especially if the burning building is about to collapse around you and you need water.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top