So last night as I was trying to fall asleep (a dangerous time for me!) I was thinking about my ST-2 that I have deployed on a mast on the side of my house. I am less than enthused about the current performance, it works OK but not as well as I thought it would. As I was going thru the possibilities I wondered if perhaps it is mounted upside down.
The ST-2 (as well as the similar Channel Master 5094) is basically a set of vertical dipoles on a common mast, connected thru a balun to the coax leading to the radio. I know that it is symmetrical, it has identical elements above and below the boom. That it goes thru a balun tells me that it probably doesn't matter which side goes up, but does it really?
I am not that well versed on antenna theory to know this. Do vertically polarized balanced antennas connected thru a balun like this have a top and bottom?
I suppose I could go up on the ladder and reverse the balun connection to the antenna (easier than physically flipping it) but it is too hot, even by Phoenix standards to do so right now.
The ST-2 (as well as the similar Channel Master 5094) is basically a set of vertical dipoles on a common mast, connected thru a balun to the coax leading to the radio. I know that it is symmetrical, it has identical elements above and below the boom. That it goes thru a balun tells me that it probably doesn't matter which side goes up, but does it really?
I am not that well versed on antenna theory to know this. Do vertically polarized balanced antennas connected thru a balun like this have a top and bottom?
I suppose I could go up on the ladder and reverse the balun connection to the antenna (easier than physically flipping it) but it is too hot, even by Phoenix standards to do so right now.